Same Day Discharge Following Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

February 1, 2024 updated by: TriHealth Inc.

Patient's Perceptions Regarding Same Day Discharge Following Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery: What do They Want Other Patients to Know?

This is a prospective cross-sectional study in which patients undergoing major pelvic reconstructive surgery with total vaginal hysterectomy will be recruited and enrolled. At approximately 2 weeks and 12 weeks postoperatively, enrolled patients will be asked to complete a survey detailing their experience with SDD, surgical recovery, and advice for prospective patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In response to COVID-19, the urogynecology department at TriHealth has recently transitioned to a same day discharge (SDD) model for our major pelvic reconstruction surgeries with total vaginal hysterectomy. Traditionally, these patients were admitted for overnight observation and discharged to home on postoperative day one. SDD after major pelvic reconstructive surgery is new in our department, but multiple studies have shown that SDD after hysterectomy is safe, cost effective, and well received by patients.

While patients have been accepting of SDD, they often have questions in the preoperative period about what to expect once they are discharged home. Previous research has shown that patients appreciate advice and recommendations from others who have previously had the same surgery; often reporting improved outcomes and satisfaction. Direct advice and narrative stories from other patients can provide a "more personal" experience of the day-to-day coping postoperatively that the physician cannot necessarily provide.

We would like to get our patients' perspective on what happened immediately after surgery, in the hospital and at home. By expanding our awareness as providers of what challenges patients face upon discharge, we will be better able to counsel patients in the preoperative period, improve patient satisfaction with surgery and SDD, and help develop strategies to mitigate areas of concern regarding the surgical process.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45220
        • Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients who underwent a total vaginal hysterectomy with concurrent vaginal native tissue prolapse repairs, including an apical suspension procedure performed by one of the fellowship trained urogynecologists at TriHealth.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Total vaginal hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingectomy/oophorectomy
  • Apical repair with uterosacral ligament suspension or sacrospinous ligament fixation
  • They may also have any of the following concurrent procedures: Anterior repair, Posterior repair, Enterocele repair, Suburethral sling for incontinence
  • Surgery by one of the fellowship trained urogynecologists at TriHealth
  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Enrollment in the "Diazepam Research Study" (Protocol ID:19-130)
  • Concomitant procedure with another surgeon
  • Chronic pain conditions that require daily use of narcotic pain medications (including but not limited to: chronic back or pelvic pain, interstitial cystitis, fibromyalgia)
  • Concomitant anal sphincteroplasty, mesh removal or use of mesh for prolapse (excluding sling procedures)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of subjects who satisfied with the results of the surgery
Time Frame: Approximately 2 weeks postoperatively
Number of subjects who answered either "Very Satisfied" or "Satisfied" to a Likert scale question "How satisfied are you with the results of your surgery." The liker scale choices are "Very Satisfied", "Satisfied", "Neutral", "Unsatisfied", and "Very Unsatisfied."
Approximately 2 weeks postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of subjects who satisfied with the results of the surgery
Time Frame: Approximately 12 weeks postoperatively
Number of subjects who answered either "Very Satisfied" or "Satisfied" to a Likert scale question "How satisfied are you with the results of your surgery." The liker scale choices are "Very Satisfied", "Satisfied", "Neutral", "Unsatisfied", and "Very Unsatisfied."
Approximately 12 weeks postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rachel Pauls, MD, TriHealth - Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 5, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 6, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 21-010

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

3
Subscribe