- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04807218
Virta Intervention in CommuniTies in COloRado (VICTOR-Pilot) (VICTOR)
Virta Intervention in CommuniTies in COloRado (VICTOR-Pilot) Pilot Study to Improve Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk in Rural Communities
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In rural communities served by Colorado Heart Healthy Solutions (CHHS), referral to a comprehensive remotely-delivered (virtual) continuous remote care to induce nutritional ketosis combined with remote medication management will improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes as compared with standard care. The study intervention is the referral. Subjects are not mandated to receive Virta treatment and are welcome to continue in the study whether or not the referral is accepted. 2 rural communities served by CHHS have been chosen as recruitment sites. Study patients will be randomized at the site level.
Objectives
Primary: To assess glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes living in a rural community referred to a comprehensive remotely-delivered continuous remote care to induce nutritional ketosis combined with remote medication management (termed "continuous remote care") as compared with those living in a rural community offered standard care.
Secondary:
- To assess the effects of referral to continuous remote care as compared with standard care on body weight and on body mass index
- To assess the effects of referral to continuous remote care as compared with standard care on number and doses of anti-hyperglycemic medications
To determine the durability of a continuous remote care intervention when paired with ongoing community health worker support
Exploratory:
- To assess the effects of referral to continuous remote care as compared with standard care on LDL-cholesterol, fasting glucose, and fasting triglyceride/HDL-cholesterol ratio
- To assess patient-reported outcomes of continuous remote care as compared with standard care
- To determine enrollment rate (offered vs accepted) in patients with type 2 diabetes living in rural communities referred to continuous remote care.
- To determine active engagement (number, timing, and types of 2-way contacts) and retention in patients with type 2 diabetes living in rural communities referred to continuous remote care.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Craig, Colorado, United States, 81625
- Northwest Colorado Health - Community Health Center & Prevention Services Craig
-
Lamar, Colorado, United States, 81052
- High Plains Community Health Center
-
Salida, Colorado, United States, 81201
- Chaffee County Public and Environmental Health
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Able to provide electronic informed consent
- Age 18 - 79 years old
- Type 2 diabetes mellitus diagnosis by self-report and/or medical history
- Taking 1 or more antihyperglycemic medications
- Current HbA1c > 7.5%
- Body mass index (BMI) 25 kg/m2 or greater
- Capable of engaging in virtual care
Exclusion Criteria:
- Type 1 diabetes
- Pregnant or planning pregnancy within the next 9 months
- Lactating
- Admission for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome (HHS) within the last 12 months
- Life expectancy <1 year
- Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and/or recurrent syncope
- Active severe psychiatric or medical condition(s) such as advanced renal (end-stage renal disease or CKD stage 4 or 5; eGFR <30 mL/min), cardiac (NYHA Class 4 heart failure), or hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh Class C)
- Any condition which in the opinion of the investigator would make the study unsuitable for the subject including investigator opinion regarding inability to comply with Virta instructions
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Nutritional Ketosis Intervention Referral
The comprehensive remotely-delivered continuous remote care to induce nutritional ketosis combined with remote medication management is the Virta treatment, and while on this treatment, subjects will have access to Virta health coaches and licensed medical providers who will perform medical therapy management, health coaching, nutrition and behavior change education, biometric feedback, and the option to participate in a community for peer support.
|
The comprehensive remotely-delivered continuous remote care to induce nutritional ketosis combined with remote medication management is the Virta treatment, and while on this treatment, subjects will have access to Virta health coaches and licensed medical providers who will perform medical therapy management, health coaching, nutrition and behavior change education, biometric feedback, and the option to participate in a community for peer support.
|
|
Active Comparator: CHHS Standard Care - Delayed Referral to Nutritional Ketosis Intervention
All subjects will be enrolled in Colorado Heart Healthy Solutions (CHHS), which consists of community health worker (CHW) contact and sessions on: 1) cardiovascular disease knowledge; 2) Health behavior change through skill building to improve diet (e.g., portion sizes, increasing fruit/vegetable intake, reducing intake of sugar sweetened beverages, decreasing fast food meals, etc.), increase physical activity, and improve well-being, tailored to individual subjects' risk profile and self-identified goals; and 3) Connection to services including primary care, mental health services if needed, and relevant community programs to address barriers (e.g.
food insecurity, need for legal help) or to promote behavior change (e.g.
free/low cost exercise programs).
|
The comprehensive remotely-delivered continuous remote care to induce nutritional ketosis combined with remote medication management is the Virta treatment, and while on this treatment, subjects will have access to Virta health coaches and licensed medical providers who will perform medical therapy management, health coaching, nutrition and behavior change education, biometric feedback, and the option to participate in a community for peer support.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in hemoglobin A1c (Percent)
Time Frame: 3.5 months
|
Change from baseline hemoglobin A1c (Percent) among patients referred to continuous remote care (Group 1) versus standard care (Group 2)
|
3.5 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in BMI
Time Frame: Baseline versus 3.5 months, 3.5 months versus 7 months, baseline versus10 months
|
Among Group 1 versus Group 2 subjects, change in body mass index (kg/m2)
|
Baseline versus 3.5 months, 3.5 months versus 7 months, baseline versus10 months
|
|
Change in hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: 3.5 months versus 7 months, baseline versus 10 months
|
Among Group 1 versus Group 2 subjects, difference in hemoglobin A1c
|
3.5 months versus 7 months, baseline versus 10 months
|
|
Change in number and/or doses of anti-hyperglycemic medications • doses of anti-hyperglycemic medications
Time Frame: Baseline versus 3.5 months, 3.5 months versus 7 months, baseline versus 10 months
|
Among Group 1 versus Group 2 subjects, difference in:
|
Baseline versus 3.5 months, 3.5 months versus 7 months, baseline versus 10 months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptance of referral to continuous remote care
Time Frame: Baseline in Group 1 versus 3.5 months in Group 2
|
Proportion agreeing to participate in continuous remote care in Group 1 at baseline versus at 3.5 months in Group 2
|
Baseline in Group 1 versus 3.5 months in Group 2
|
|
Change in fasting triglyceride/HDL ratio
Time Frame: Baseline versus 3.5 months, 3.5 months versus 7 months, baseline versus 10 months
|
Among Group 1 versus Group 2 subjects, change from in fasting triglyceride/HDL ratio
|
Baseline versus 3.5 months, 3.5 months versus 7 months, baseline versus 10 months
|
|
Change in LDL-cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline versus 3.5 months, 3.5 months versus 7 months, baseline versus 10 months
|
Among Group 1 versus Group 2 subjects, change from in LDL-cholesterol
|
Baseline versus 3.5 months, 3.5 months versus 7 months, baseline versus 10 months
|
|
Change in fasting glucose
Time Frame: Baseline versus 3.5 months, 3.5 months versus 7 months, baseline versus 10 months
|
Among Group 1 versus Group 2 subjects, change from in fasting glucose
|
Baseline versus 3.5 months, 3.5 months versus 7 months, baseline versus 10 months
|
|
Acceptance/continuation of referral to continuous remote care
Time Frame: Baseline and 3.5 months
|
Among Group 1 subjects, proportion agreeing to participate in continuous remote care
|
Baseline and 3.5 months
|
|
Continuation of referral in Group 1 versus acceptance of referral in Group 2
Time Frame: 3.5 months
|
Among Group 1 versus Group 2 subjects, proportion agreeing to participate/continue in continuous remote care
|
3.5 months
|
|
Change in perceived health status
Time Frame: Baseline, 3.5 months, 7 months and 10 months
|
Among Group 1 and Group 2 subjects, evaluation over time (i.e. 3 months post-intervention) in perceived health status as assessed by question 1 of the Short Form Health Survey (SF-1).
|
Baseline, 3.5 months, 7 months and 10 months
|
|
Change in diabetes treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline, 3.5 months, 7 months and 10 months
|
Among Group 1 and Group 2 subjects, evaluation over time at baseline, in diabetes treatment satisfaction as assessed by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire.
The scale for the survey questions is 0-6.
In general, a higher score indicates a higher level of satisfaction with diabetic treatment.
|
Baseline, 3.5 months, 7 months and 10 months
|
|
Count of 2-way contacts among subjects
Time Frame: 3.5 months and 7 months
|
Among Group 1 and Group 2 subjects, evaluation in active engagement as assessed by number of 2-way contacts.
|
3.5 months and 7 months
|
|
Acceptability of referral
Time Frame: Group 1: baseline, 3.5 months and 7 months / Group 2: 3.5 months and 7 months
|
Among Group 1 subjects at baseline 3.5 and 7 months, and Group 2 subjects at 3.5 and 7 months.
Participants will be asked 'Did you complete the referral to Virta Health?' Yes/No
|
Group 1: baseline, 3.5 months and 7 months / Group 2: 3.5 months and 7 months
|
|
Acceptability of referral over time
Time Frame: Group 1: baseline, 3.5 months and 7 months / Group 2: 3.5 months and 7 months
|
Among Group 1 subjects at baseline 3.5 and 7 months, and Group 2 subjects at 3.5 and 7 months.
Participants will be asked if they are still continuing their treatment with Virta Health.
|
Group 1: baseline, 3.5 months and 7 months / Group 2: 3.5 months and 7 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Cecilia Low Wang, MD, CPC Clinical Research
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Athinarayanan SJ, Adams RN, Hallberg SJ, McKenzie AL, Bhanpuri NH, Campbell WW, Volek JS, Phinney SD, McCarter JP. Long-Term Effects of a Novel Continuous Remote Care Intervention Including Nutritional Ketosis for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes: A 2-Year Non-randomized Clinical Trial. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Jun 5;10:348. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00348. eCollection 2019.
- Stellefson M, Dipnarine K, Stopka C. The chronic care model and diabetes management in US primary care settings: a systematic review. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E26. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120180.
- Lee SWH, Chan CKY, Chua SS, Chaiyakunapruk N. Comparative effectiveness of telemedicine strategies on type 2 diabetes management: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 4;7(1):12680. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12987-z.
- Yaemsiri S, Alfier JM, Moy E, Rossen LM, Bastian B, Bolin J, Ferdinand AO, Callaghan T, Heron M. Healthy People 2020: Rural Areas Lag In Achieving Targets For Major Causes Of Death. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Dec;38(12):2027-2031. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00915.
- American Diabetes Association. 1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S7-S14. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S001.
- Lee JY, Lee SWH. Telemedicine Cost-Effectiveness for Diabetes Management: A Systematic Review. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Jul;20(7):492-500. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0098. Epub 2018 May 29.
- McKenzie AL, Hallberg SJ, Creighton BC, Volk BM, Link TM, Abner MK, Glon RM, McCarter JP, Volek JS, Phinney SD. A Novel Intervention Including Individualized Nutritional Recommendations Reduces Hemoglobin A1c Level, Medication Use, and Weight in Type 2 Diabetes. JMIR Diabetes. 2017 Mar 7;2(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.6981.
- Bhanpuri NH, Hallberg SJ, Williams PT, McKenzie AL, Ballard KD, Campbell WW, McCarter JP, Phinney SD, Volek JS. Cardiovascular disease risk factor responses to a type 2 diabetes care model including nutritional ketosis induced by sustained carbohydrate restriction at 1 year: an open label, non-randomized, controlled study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018 May 1;17(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0698-8.
- Hallberg SJ, McKenzie AL, Williams PT, Bhanpuri NH, Peters AL, Campbell WW, Hazbun TL, Volk BM, McCarter JP, Phinney SD, Volek JS. Author Correction: Effectiveness and Safety of a Novel Care Model for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes at 1 Year: An Open-Label, Non-Randomized, Controlled Study. Diabetes Ther. 2018 Apr;9(2):613-621. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0386-4.
- Krantz MJ, Coronel SM, Whitley EM, Dale R, Yost J, Estacio RO. Effectiveness of a community health worker cardiovascular risk reduction program in public health and health care settings. Am J Public Health. 2013 Jan;103(1):e19-27. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301068. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Diabetes Basics: Type 2 diabetes. Page last reviewed: May 30, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/basics/type2.html. Accessed 06 January 2021.
- Kazemian P, Shebl FM, McCann N, Walensky RP, Wexler DJ. Evaluation of the Cascade of Diabetes Care in the United States, 2005-2016. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Oct 1;179(10):1376-1385. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.2396.
- Egbujie BA, Delobelle PA, Levitt N, Puoane T, Sanders D, van Wyk B. Role of community health workers in type 2 diabetes mellitus self-management: A scoping review. PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0198424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198424. eCollection 2018.
- Understanding Scope and Competencies: A Contemporary Look at the United States Community Health Worker Field: Progress Report of the Community Health Worker (CHW) Core Consensus (C3) Project: Building National Consensus on CHW Core Roles, Skills, and Qualities [Internet], 2016. Available from: http://files.ctctcdn.com/a907c850501/1c1289f0-88cc-49c3-a238-66def942c147.pdf. Accessed 04 November 2020.
- Faruque LI, Wiebe N, Ehteshami-Afshar A, Liu Y, Dianati-Maleki N, Hemmelgarn BR, Manns BJ, Tonelli M; Alberta Kidney Disease Network. Effect of telemedicine on glycated hemoglobin in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. CMAJ. 2017 Mar 6;189(9):E341-E364. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150885. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
- Marcolino MS, Maia JX, Alkmim MB, Boersma E, Ribeiro AL. Telemedicine application in the care of diabetes patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 8;8(11):e79246. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079246. eCollection 2013.
- American Diabetes Association. 5. Facilitating Behavior Change and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2021. Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S53-S72. doi: 10.2337/dc21-S005.
- Sainsbury E, Kizirian NV, Partridge SR, Gill T, Colagiuri S, Gibson AA. Effect of dietary carbohydrate restriction on glycemic control in adults with diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 May;139:239-252. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
- Snorgaard O, Poulsen GM, Andersen HK, Astrup A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Feb 23;5(1):e000354. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000354. eCollection 2017.
- Senn S. Crossover Trials in Clinical Research. (1993) John Wiley & Sons, New York.
- Littell RC, et al. SASA System for Linear Models. (1991) Third edition, Cary, NC. SAS Institute, Inc.
- United States Food and Drug Administration. E6(R2) Good Clinical Practice: Integrated Addendum to ICH E6(R1). Guidance for Industry. OMB Control No. 0910-0843. March, 2018
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- VIRT-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillAmerican Heart AssociationRecruitingType 2 Diabetes | Nutrition | Diabetes Type 2 | T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) | Diabetes Mellitis | T2DM | Diabetes EducationUnited States
-
ENBIOSIS BIOTECHNOLOGIESAydin Adnan Menderes University; Izmir University of Economics; Buca Seyfi Demirsoy... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingType 2 Diabetes | Diabetes Mellitus Type 2Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion...Active, not recruiting
-
Endogenex, Inc.Not yet recruitingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type 2 Diabetes | Type2diabetes
-
Endogenex, Inc.Not yet recruitingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) | Type2Diabetes
-
University of Colorado, DenverMassachusetts General Hospital; Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of... and other collaboratorsRecruitingDiabetes Mellitus | Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes | Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type I | Diabetes Mellitus Type II | Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent | Diabetes, Autoimmune | Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) | Diabetes Type 2 on Insulin | Diabetes, Type IIUnited States
-
University of SalamancaUniversity of Salamanca; Instituto Piaget; Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde...Enrolling by invitationType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Aging | Hyperglycemia Due to Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPortugal
-
Kaiser PermanenteThe Permanente Medical GroupEnrolling by invitationType 2 Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) | Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)United States
-
SanofiCompletedType 1 Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2 Diabetes MellitusHungary, Russian Federation, Germany, Poland, Japan, United States, Finland
-
Steno Diabetes Center CopenhagenRecruitingDiabetes | Cognitive Impairment | Type 2 Diabetes | Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 | Cognitive Decline | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)Denmark
Clinical Trials on Virta Health
-
Virta HealthCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Metabolic Syndrome | Pre-diabetesUnited States
-
Colgate PalmoliveCompleted
-
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityThe Scientific and Technological Research Council of TurkeyCompletedAge ≥ 18 Years Old | Receiving HD Treatment at Least 6 Months | Having no Hearing, Visual, or Speech Impairment | Performing Self-oral CareTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Florida State UniversityUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; University of GeorgiaEnrolling by invitationCardiovascular Disease Risk ReductionUnited States
-
University of LisbonRecruitingOral Health Behavior Change | Oral Health Care | Oral Health Self-efficacyPortugal
-
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria CareggiAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Renato Dulbecco; AUSL - IRCCS in Tecnologie... and other collaboratorsCompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Italy
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamAmerican Heart Association; ConnectionHealth; Memora HealthCompletedPregnancy | Disparities | InfantsUnited States
-
Jacobs University Bremen gGmbHDr. Becker Hospital Group; Dr. Becker Klinik Möhnesee; Dr. Becker Burg-Klinik... and other collaboratorsCompletedAnxiety | Communication | Psychological Distress | Health Risk Behaviors | Healthy Lifestyle | Psychological Adjustment | Psychological Stress | Psychological Disorder | Behavior, Health | Psychological Disease | Psychosomatic Disorder | Psychological Adaptation | Health Care Seeking Behavior | Psychological Disability and other conditionsGermany
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterDuncan Family Institute (DFI) Seed Funding ProgramActive, not recruiting
-
Universiti Putra MalaysiaRecruitingNeck Pain | Cervical Spondylosis | Neck DisorderChina