Evaluating UTI Diagnosis in Nursing Homes

August 24, 2023 updated by: Pathnostics
This prospective, multicenter, comparative cohort observational study is to determine whether the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway, a standardized infrastructure for specimen collection and result delivery, compared with current traditional pathways for urine testing reduces the proportion of UTI patients with poor outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Suspended

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to determine if prospective data, collected over 12 months from over 200 nursing homes, will show that the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway is more effective than the Traditional Clinical Pathways for urine testing in UTI diagnosis in Nursing Homes. Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway provides standardized infrastructure for specimen collection, and result dissemination via assigned report point person to verify receipt of actionable data. The pathway also includes several in-services on molecular testing for UTI, Pooled Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing, and polymicrobial infections to help providers better understand test methodology. Standardizing a Clinical Care Pathway for testing and reporting of clinical results approach may lead to a reduction in empiric broad spectrum antibiotic use and in turn better health-related outcomes for patients. Such efficiency in clinical decision making at the time of initial presentation may lead to improved patient care by avoiding ineffective therapy due to mismanagement or incomplete lab diagnosis. The study will be observing the implementation of the Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway and comparing it to traditional clinical care pathways from facility-level data entered into the National Healthcare Safety Network for its LTCF (Long Term Care Facilities) Component.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

40000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92614
        • Pathnostics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

63 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Cohort of residents residing in the NH facility during 12 consecutive months.-

Description

Inclusion

  • Certified skilled nursing facilities (SNF) and nursing homes (NH)
  • Nonprofit or for-profit freestanding facility certified by Medicare and Medicaid
  • Currently utilizing an EMR system
  • Minimum bed size of 100

Exclusion

  • Assisted Living Facilities and Residential Care Facilities
  • Participation in another UTI trial during the study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Guidance Clinical Pathway
Facilities will be provided a standardized infrastructure and process for collecting and reporting of urine test results including unique lab requisitions that contain the option to order Guidance® UTI, Standard Urine Culture (SUC), and Urine Analysis (UA) along with a protocol for results notification to a central point person within the Nursing Home (NH) facility
Traditional Clinical Pathway
Facilities will employ their current standard clinical care practices for suspected UTI, including SUC, UA, and Guidance® UTI testing as per current reporting practices. Providers at these facilities will have the option to order any diagnostic test they deem appropriate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Examine prospective data to determine if the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway, compared to traditional clinical pathways, will reduce the proportion of patients with UTI-related adverse events.
Time Frame: 12 Months
Examine the proportion of patients with UTI-related adverse events requiring emergency hospital services over the course the study with a composite measure of the number of UTI related ED visits and/or subsequent hospitalizations and/or sepsis events.
12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Examine prospective data to determine if the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway, compared to traditional clinical pathways, will reduce overall inappropriate antibiotic use.
Time Frame: 30 Days
Examine prospective data to determine if the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway, compared to traditional clinical pathways, will reduce overall inappropriate antibiotic use as measured by the rate of empiric antibiotic starts and the rate of antimicrobial changes for UTI indication.
30 Days
Examine prospective data to determine if the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway is more effective than standard urine testing approaches in the clinical evaluation of UTI diagnosis and management .
Time Frame: 12 Months

Examine prospective data to determine if the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway is more effective than standard urine testing approaches in the clinical evaluation of UTI diagnosis and management as measured by UTI incidence and corresponding urine testing rate

  • (UTI and Catheter associated (CA)-UTI bacterial identification incidence rates (diagnostic aim)
  • Population UTI Rate = (UTI Episodes/Resident Days) x 1,000
  • CA-UTI Rate = (CA-UTI Episode/Catheter days) x 1,000
12 Months
Examine prospective data to determine if the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway, compared to traditional clinical pathways, will reduce UTI antibiotic collateral effects.
Time Frame: 30 Days

Examine prospective data to determine if the use of Guidance® UTI Clinical Pathway, compared to traditional clinical pathways, will reduce UTI antibiotic collateral effects as measured by:

  • C. diff event rate = (Total C. diff events/ total resident days) x 1,000
30 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dave Baunoch, PhD, Clinical Trials

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Tract Infections

3
Subscribe