Anaesthetic Efficacy of 2% Mepivacaine Versus 4% Articaine With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

July 27, 2021 updated by: Suzan AW Amin, Cairo University

Anaesthetic Efficacy of 2% Mepivacaine Versus 4% Articaine for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Blocks in Patients With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis in Mandibular Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of this randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial was to assess the effect of 3.6 mL 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine compared to 3.4 mL 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine on the success of the inferior alveolar nerve block for patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The aim of this randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial was to assess the effect of 3.6 mL 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine compared to 3.4 mL 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine on the success of the inferior alveolar nerve block for patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars. Patients were clinically and radiographically examined and their eligibility assessed and preoperative pain was measured using the numerical rating scale (NRS). Patients were randomly assigned to one of 2 groups: experimental group (2% mepivacaine) and the control group (4% articaine). After 15 minutes of the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), patients reporting lip numbness had their molars accessed. No-to-mild pain response was considered success during root canal preparation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

330

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in good health (American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I or II).
  • Patients having symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in one of their mandibular molars.
  • Age range between 18 to 50 years.
  • Patients who can understand Numerical Rating Scale (NRS).
  • Positive patient acceptance and the ability to sign an informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant females.
  • Patients allergic to articaine, mepivacaine and/or any used medication or material.
  • Patients having active sites of pathosis in the area of injection.
  • Patients having active pain in more than one molar.
  • Patients who had taken analgesics in the 12 hours preceding treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Mepivacaine
IANB using 3.6 ml of 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine.
IANB using 3.6 ml of 2% mepivacaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Articaine
IANB using 3.4 ml of 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine.
IANB using 3.4 ml of 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 epinephrine.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anaesthetic success
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Success of mandibular inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia during access cavity preparation and instrumentation measured using the 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) so that no-or-mild pain is considered as anesthetic success and moderate-to-severe pain is considered anesthetic failure.
Intraoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Need for Supplemental anaesthesia
Time Frame: Intraoperative
The need for supplemental anaesthesia to complete treatment (Yes/No).
Intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Randa ElBoghdadi, PhD, Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

Clinical Trials on Mepivacaine

3
Subscribe