Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the REAL INTELLIGENCE™ CORI™ in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Procedure (CORI RCT TKA)

March 9, 2026 updated by: Smith & Nephew, Inc.

A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of REAL INTELLIGENCE™ CORI™ in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) Procedure

Background:

REAL INTELLIGENCE™ CORI™ (CORI Robotics) is a computer-assisted orthopaedic surgical navigation and burring system. CORI Robotics is designed to help surgeons in planning and executing certain types of knee surgery involving bone preparation. These types of surgery are called 'unicondylar knee arthroplasty' (UKA) and 'total knee arthroplasty' (TKA).

Purpose:

This study is being carried out to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the CORI Robotics in TKA procedure. The data collected will be used to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of CORI and to register CORI in China mainland. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the use of CORI in TKA procedure in achieving post-operative leg alignment as compared to procedures using conventional manual instruments.

Research participants / locations:

140 research participants will be recruited from up to 8 sites in 3 countries globally (Australia, China Mainland, Hong Kong and New Zealand). There will be 70 patients having TKA using CORI and 70 patients having TKA using conventional procedure.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Epping, Australia, 3076
      • Beijing, China, 100035
        • Recruiting
        • Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yixin Zhou
      • Shatin, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • The Prince of Wales Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kevin Ho
      • Auckland, New Zealand, 0620

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is a suitable candidate for a TKA procedure using CORI and a corresponding S+N Knee Implant System.
  2. Subject requires a cemented TKA as a primary indication that meets any of the following condition:

    • Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease, including osteoarthritis
    • Rheumatoid arthritis
    • Avascular necrosis
    • Requires correction of functional deformity
    • Requires treatment of fractures that were unmanageable using other techniques
  3. Subject is of legal age to consent and considered skeletally mature (≥ 18 years of age at the time of surgery)
  4. Subject agrees to consent to and to follow the study visit schedule (as defined in the study protocol and informed consent form), by signing the Ethical Committee (EC) or Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent form.
  5. Subject plans to be available through two (2) year postoperative follow-up.
  6. Applicable routine radiographic assessment is possible.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject requires a TKA on the index joint as a revision for a previously failed surgery, or has the need for complex implants, or any other implant than a standard TKA (e.g. stems, augments, or custom-made devices).
  2. Subject has been diagnosed with post-traumatic arthritis.
  3. Subject receives simultaneous bilateral UKA OR a unilateral UKA with contralateral TKA.
  4. Subject has one or more of the following arthroplasties that are not fully healed and well-functioning, as determined by the investigator:-Contralateral primary TKA or UKA, however, the subject can only have one knee enrolled in this study.
  5. Subject does not understand the language used in the Informed Consent Form.
  6. Subject does not meet the indication or is contraindicated for TKA according to the specific Smith+Nephew Knee System's Instructions For Use (IFU).
  7. Subject has active infection or sepsis (treated or untreated).
  8. Subject is morbidly obese with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40.
  9. Subject is pregnant or breast feeding at the time of surgery.
  10. Subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, has advanced osteoarthritis or joint disease at the time of surgery and was better suited for an alternate procedure.
  11. Subject currently enrolled in another orthopedic clinical trial study.
  12. Subject has a condition(s) that may interfere with the TKA survival or outcome (i.e., Paget's or Charcot's disease, vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, uncontrolled diabetes, moderate to severe renal insufficiency or neuromuscular disease, or an active, local infection).
  13. Subject in the opinion of the Investigator has an emotional or neurological condition that would pre-empt their ability or willingness to participate in the study including mental illness, intellectual disability, drug or alcohol abuse.
  14. Subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, has a neuromuscular disorder that prohibited control of the index joint.
  15. Subject is a prisoner or meets the definition of a Vulnerable Subject per International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 14155:2020 Section 3.55.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CORI
Subjects in need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as decided by their doctor and treated with CORI Robotics System.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) treated with CORI Robotics System.
Active Comparator: Conventional Procedure
Subjects in need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as decided by their doctor and treated with conventional approach with conventional manual instrumentation.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) treated with conventional approach with conventional manual instrumentation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative Leg Alignment
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Post-operative leg alignment via radiographic assessment. Post-operative leg alignment is achieved when the deviation from the subject specific target does not exceed ±3 degrees.
6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Component Alignment
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Component alignment will be assessed on long leg standing antero-posterior (A/P) X-rays and standard non weight bearing lateral X-rays taken 6 weeks after surgery
6 weeks
Radiographic Assessment
Time Frame: 12 months and 24 months
Radiographic assessment on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral (L) views shall be performed to identify the presence of radiolucent lines, osteolysis & implant migration.
12 months and 24 months
2011 Knee Society Score (KSS)
Time Frame: Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months

The Functional Knee Score is derived from assessments of walking and standing, standard activities, advanced activities, and discretionary activities in TKA subjects. The 2011 Knee Society Score consists of 4 separate subscales:

  1. An "Objective" Knee Score (seven items: 100 points)
  2. A Patient Satisfaction Score (five items: 40 points)
  3. A Patient Expectation Score (three items: 15 points)
  4. A Functional Activity Score (19 items: 100 points).

A higher number is a better outcome.

Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Oxford Knee Score (OKS)
Time Frame: Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
To specifically assess the patient's perspective of outcome following knee arthroplasty surgery in TKA subjects. Responses to each question ranges from 0-4 with a range of a possible overall score from 0-48. A score of 0 is the worst possible outcome while a score of 48 is the best possible outcome.
Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
To assess joint-specific patient reported outcomes in TKA subjects. Responses to 12 questions are recorded with a five point Likert response format: "Never", "almost never", "seldom", "sometimes" and "mostly". The item scores are summed and linearly transformed in a 0 to 100 scale and then reversed with a high value reflecting the ability of the subject to forget about the replaced knee joint during the activities of daily living. A score of 100 is the best possible outcome.
6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
EuroQol Five-Dimensional Five-Level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months
To assess the subject's health state in TKA subjects. The EQ-5D-5L is composed of the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ Visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Responses are coded as single-digit numbers expressing the severity level selected in each dimension. For instance, 'slight problems' (e.g. 'I have slight problems in walking about') is always coded as '2'. The digits for the five dimensions are combined in a 5-digit code. The EQ- 5D-5L index value is derived by using the vendor supplied calculator to convert each 5-digit EQ-5D-5L profile. The EQ VAS corresponds to a 20 cm vertical, visual analogue scale ranging from 'the best health you can imagine' to 'the worst health you can imagine'. A higher number is a better outcome.
Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Julie Lankiewicz, Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 17, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CORI.2020.08

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthroplasty

Clinical Trials on CORI Robotics

Subscribe