Efficacy of Robot-assisted Technique vs Conventional Technique in Preventing Early Micromobilisation After UKA

February 12, 2024 updated by: Stefano Zaffagnini, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Efficacy of Robot-assisted Technique vs Conventional Technique in Preventing Early Micromobilisation After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: a Controlled Randomized Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare the percentage of early micromibilisation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasties in robot-assisted technique vs standard technique.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of the study is to compare the percentage of early micromobilisation by static radiostereometric analysis (RSA) - primary outcome, gait analysis by inertial sensors to assess gait kinematics, and clinical perdormance measured by american knee society score (AKSS), oxford knee score (OKS), patient satisfaction score (PSS) and EQ5-D - secondary outcomes, among 2 groups of patients, of 25 individuals each, whi undergo medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

The first group will be operated with a robot-assisted technique (with CORI Surgical System, Smith and Nephew, USA), the other with standard technique and the same implant (Journey UNI II, Smith and Nephew, USA).

The study will be a randomized and controlled blind superiority trial. Patients will not be informed about performing the surgery with one technique or the other in order to avoid potential biases in the data analysis.

Patients will be recruited at the orthoaedic and traumatologic 2nd clinica (head prof S. Zaffagnini) at IRCSS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli in Bologna, Italy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Emilia Romagna
      • Bologna, Emilia Romagna, Italy, 40136
        • Recruiting
        • IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stefano Zaffagnini, Prof.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Prof.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unicompartmental Knee Arthrosis
  • Femoral condyles or medial tibial plate osteonecrosis
  • Healthy anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament and collateral ligaments of the affected knee
  • Post traumatic loss of joint configuration
  • Moderate varism deformity
  • Patients between 50 and 80 years old
  • Patients able to undergo a 2-year follow up after surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bi or Tricompartmental arthrosis
  • Unhealty anterior or posterior cruciate ligaments or collateral ligaments
  • Patients with neuromuscolar, degenerative and joint-related conditions
  • Patients younger than 50
  • Patients older than 80
  • Patients unable to undergo a 2-year follow up after surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Robot-assisted UKA
Unicompartmental knee replacement (Journey II UKA, Smith and Nephew, USA) positioned via CORI surgical system (Smith & Nephew, USA).
Cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty via mini-invasive medial approach and robotic assistance. Tourniquet will be used in all patients.
Other Names:
  • CORI Surgical System, Smith and Nephew
Active Comparator: Standard technique UKA
Unicompartmental knee replacement (Journey II UKA, Smith and Nephew, USA) positioned via standard technique.
Cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty via mini-invasive medial approach and standard technique. Tourniquet will be used in all patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Time Frame: Within 7 days from surgery, during hospitalisation
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
Within 7 days from surgery, during hospitalisation
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Time Frame: 3 months
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
3 months
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Time Frame: 6 months
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
6 months
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Time Frame: 12 months
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
12 months
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Time Frame: 24 months
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait analysis via inertial sensors
Time Frame: Within 7 days from surgery, during hospitalisation
Inertial sensors (Awinda, Xsens Technologies and Gwalk, BTS engineering) will be placed on the patients then performed walking under VICON cameras analysis.
Within 7 days from surgery, during hospitalisation
Gait analysis via inertial sensors
Time Frame: 6 months
Inertial sensors (Awinda, Xsens Technologies and Gwalk, BTS engineering) will be placed on the patients then performed walking under VICON cameras analysis.
6 months
Gait analysis via inertial sensors
Time Frame: 24 months
Inertial sensors (Awinda, Xsens Technologies and Gwalk, BTS engineering) will be placed on the patients then performed walking under VICON cameras analysis.
24 months
American Knee Society score
Time Frame: Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
Used to test knee function by the investigator: it has a clinical and a functional part
Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
Oxford Knee Score
Time Frame: Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
Consists of 12 questions to be filled by the patient to assess how the prosthesis affect activities of daily living.
Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
Patient Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
A short personal questionnaire that assesses subjective satisfaction after surgery
Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
EQ5-D questionnaire
Time Frame: Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
a questionnaire filled by the patient assessing the overall health of the subject. It is a test used to assess quality of life index.
Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stefano Zaffagnini, Prof., IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
  • Study Director: Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Prof., IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
  • Study Chair: Stefano Fratini, Dr., IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
  • Study Chair: Stefano Di Paolo, Eng., University of Bologna
  • Study Chair: Laura Bragonzoni, Dr., University of Bologna
  • Study Chair: Raffaele Zinno, Dr., University of Bologna
  • Study Chair: Giuseppe Barone, Dr., University of Bologna

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RSA UNI CORI

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No sharing planned

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Loosening, Prosthesis

Clinical Trials on Robot-assisted UKA

3
Subscribe