- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05204797
Efficacy of Robot-assisted Technique vs Conventional Technique in Preventing Early Micromobilisation After UKA
Efficacy of Robot-assisted Technique vs Conventional Technique in Preventing Early Micromobilisation After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: a Controlled Randomized Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The purpose of the study is to compare the percentage of early micromobilisation by static radiostereometric analysis (RSA) - primary outcome, gait analysis by inertial sensors to assess gait kinematics, and clinical perdormance measured by american knee society score (AKSS), oxford knee score (OKS), patient satisfaction score (PSS) and EQ5-D - secondary outcomes, among 2 groups of patients, of 25 individuals each, whi undergo medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
The first group will be operated with a robot-assisted technique (with CORI Surgical System, Smith and Nephew, USA), the other with standard technique and the same implant (Journey UNI II, Smith and Nephew, USA).
The study will be a randomized and controlled blind superiority trial. Patients will not be informed about performing the surgery with one technique or the other in order to avoid potential biases in the data analysis.
Patients will be recruited at the orthoaedic and traumatologic 2nd clinica (head prof S. Zaffagnini) at IRCSS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli in Bologna, Italy.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Stefano Zaffagnini, Prof.
- Phone Number: 00390516366111
- Email: stefano.zaffagnini@unibo.it
Study Locations
-
-
Emilia Romagna
-
Bologna, Emilia Romagna, Italy, 40136
- Recruiting
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
-
Contact:
- Stefano Zaffagnini, Prof.
- Phone Number: 00390516366111
- Email: stefano.zaffagnini@unibo.it
-
Principal Investigator:
- Stefano Zaffagnini, Prof.
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Prof.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Unicompartmental Knee Arthrosis
- Femoral condyles or medial tibial plate osteonecrosis
- Healthy anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament and collateral ligaments of the affected knee
- Post traumatic loss of joint configuration
- Moderate varism deformity
- Patients between 50 and 80 years old
- Patients able to undergo a 2-year follow up after surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bi or Tricompartmental arthrosis
- Unhealty anterior or posterior cruciate ligaments or collateral ligaments
- Patients with neuromuscolar, degenerative and joint-related conditions
- Patients younger than 50
- Patients older than 80
- Patients unable to undergo a 2-year follow up after surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Robot-assisted UKA
Unicompartmental knee replacement (Journey II UKA, Smith and Nephew, USA) positioned via CORI surgical system (Smith & Nephew, USA).
|
Cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty via mini-invasive medial approach and robotic assistance.
Tourniquet will be used in all patients.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Standard technique UKA
Unicompartmental knee replacement (Journey II UKA, Smith and Nephew, USA) positioned via standard technique.
|
Cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty via mini-invasive medial approach and standard technique.
Tourniquet will be used in all patients.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Time Frame: Within 7 days from surgery, during hospitalisation
|
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
|
Within 7 days from surgery, during hospitalisation
|
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
|
3 months
|
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
|
6 months
|
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
|
12 months
|
Static radiostereometric analysis (RSA)
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Dual X-Ray simultaneous evaluation of micromobilisation via radiopaque markers and software comparison
|
24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Gait analysis via inertial sensors
Time Frame: Within 7 days from surgery, during hospitalisation
|
Inertial sensors (Awinda, Xsens Technologies and Gwalk, BTS engineering) will be placed on the patients then performed walking under VICON cameras analysis.
|
Within 7 days from surgery, during hospitalisation
|
Gait analysis via inertial sensors
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Inertial sensors (Awinda, Xsens Technologies and Gwalk, BTS engineering) will be placed on the patients then performed walking under VICON cameras analysis.
|
6 months
|
Gait analysis via inertial sensors
Time Frame: 24 months
|
Inertial sensors (Awinda, Xsens Technologies and Gwalk, BTS engineering) will be placed on the patients then performed walking under VICON cameras analysis.
|
24 months
|
American Knee Society score
Time Frame: Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
|
Used to test knee function by the investigator: it has a clinical and a functional part
|
Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
|
Oxford Knee Score
Time Frame: Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
|
Consists of 12 questions to be filled by the patient to assess how the prosthesis affect activities of daily living.
|
Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
|
Patient Satisfaction Score
Time Frame: Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
|
A short personal questionnaire that assesses subjective satisfaction after surgery
|
Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
|
EQ5-D questionnaire
Time Frame: Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
|
a questionnaire filled by the patient assessing the overall health of the subject.
It is a test used to assess quality of life index.
|
Pre-operatively, then at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stefano Zaffagnini, Prof., IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
- Study Director: Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Prof., IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
- Study Chair: Stefano Fratini, Dr., IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
- Study Chair: Stefano Di Paolo, Eng., University of Bologna
- Study Chair: Laura Bragonzoni, Dr., University of Bologna
- Study Chair: Raffaele Zinno, Dr., University of Bologna
- Study Chair: Giuseppe Barone, Dr., University of Bologna
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RSA UNI CORI
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Loosening, Prosthesis
-
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, SwedenCompletedProsthesis LooseningSweden
-
Reinier Haga Orthopedisch CentrumEnrolling by invitation
-
University Hospital, LimogesTerminatedProsthesis LooseningFrance
-
Region SkaneCompletedAseptic Loosening of the Hip ProsthesisSweden
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliCompleted
-
Medtronic Surgical TechnologiesCompletedInfection of Total Knee Joint Prosthesis | Aseptic Loosening of Prosthetic JointGermany
-
Turku University HospitalCompletedInfection of Total Hip Joint Prosthesis | Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris | Mechanical Loosening of Prosthetic JointFinland
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensCompletedArthroplasty Complications | Aseptic Loosening
-
Leiden University Medical CenterStryker NordicTerminatedAseptic Loosening | Complications; Arthroplasty, MechanicalNetherlands
-
Stryker OrthopaedicsCompletedArthritis Knee | Aseptic Loosening
Clinical Trials on Robot-assisted UKA
-
Northwest Surgical Specialists, VancouverStryker Corp.CompletedUnicompartmental Knee ArthroplastyUnited States
-
Institut Paoli-CalmettesNot yet recruiting
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesCompleted
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)SuspendedDisease or DisorderUnited States
-
National University Hospital, SingaporeNational University, Singapore; Agency for Science, Technology and ResearchCompleted
-
Yingxue HaoUnknown
-
RenJi HospitalUnknown
-
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing...Active, not recruiting
-
Universita di VeronaCompletedMultiple Sclerosis | RehabilitationItaly
-
UMC UtrechtCompletedEsophageal Cancer | Esophageal CarcinomaNetherlands