Internet-delivered Intervention Targeting Residual Cognitive Symptoms After Major Depressive Disorder (RestDep)

March 10, 2025 updated by: Haukeland University Hospital

A Guided Internet-delivered Intervention for Adults With Residual Cognitive Symptoms After Major Depressive Disorder: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Clinical Effects

Background: Cognitive impairment and difficulties are frequently observed in individuals suffering from major depressive disorder. These impairments and difficulties can persist into remission as residual cognitive symptoms. Consequently affecting daily life functioning and quality of life for those affected. Few scalable interventions have targeted these symptoms and measured long-term clinical effects such as depression relapse.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background:Cognitive impairment and difficulties are frequently observed in individuals suffering from major depressive disorder. These impairments and difficulties can persist into remission as residual cognitive symptoms. Consequently affecting daily life functioning and quality of life for those affected. Few scalable interventions have targeted these symptoms and measured long-term clinical effects such as depression relapse.

Objectives: The aim is to assess the clinical effects of an intervention targeting residual cognitive symptoms after major depressive disorder. More specifically, if residual cognitive symptoms would be significantly decreased from pre- to post-treatment and remain stable at the 6-month and 2 year follow-up.

Methods: the study is a randomized, waitlist controlled trial including a total of 60 participants (30 in each arm). Primary measures are residual cognitive symptoms measured by the Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functions Adults (BRIEF-A) and Perceived Deficit Questionnaire 5 (PDQ-5). Secondary outcome measures are Depression measured by Montgomery Aasberg Depression Rating Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire 9 and 2 (PHQ-9 and PHQ2), Satisfaction with life measured by Satisfaction with life scale (SWLS), Credibility measured by the Treatment Credibility and Expectation Scale, Rumination measured by the Rumination Response Scale (RRS), Depression screening assessed using the MINI International Psychiatric Interview, Usage data measured by number of log-ins, session length and days in treatment. Quantitative statistical methods will be used to analyze data.

Discussion: The results from the study will contribute to field of internet interventions and provide former depressed adults with an easy access intervention in the treatment of residual cognitive symptoms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bergen, Norway
        • Haukeland University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previously received treatment for major depressive disorder in primary or secondary healthcare services
  • Reporting a history of major depressive disorder symptoms assess using the MINI. few or minor depression symptomss (< 12 MADRS)
  • Not meeting criteria for major depressive disorder measured by the MINI)
  • Self-reporting residual cognitive symptoms that affects daily functioning (assessed by clinical psychologist)
  • No changes in anti-depressant medication under the study period
  • Age between 18 and 65 years
  • Read and write Norwegian
  • Internet and telephone access.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported substance abuse
  • Neurological conditions or damage (e.g. autism, cerebral haemorrhage, and brain tumour)
  • Bipolar disorder
  • Psychosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Intervention
Participants will after baseline receive a guided intervention with weekly therapist support.
The intervention is fully digital with weekly telephone guidance. Key intervention elements are 1) psychoeducation, 2) attention training, 3) strategy training. Cognitive domains as attention, memory and executive functions are covered and rumination.
No Intervention: Control: Waitlist
Participants will not receive intervention until 7 weeks after baseline.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behaviour Rating Inventory Of Executive Function-Adult
Time Frame: 2.5 years
The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Adult (BRIEF-A; Roth, Isquith, & Gioia, 2005) is a 75-item self-report questionnaire designed to measure adults' behaviors associated with executive problems.
2.5 years
Perceived Deficit Questionnaire 5
Time Frame: 2.5 years
Brief assessment of subjective cognitive difficulties and covers problems with concentration (e.g. "trouble concentrating on things like watching a television program or reading a book?"), memory (e.g. "forget what you talked about after a telephone conversation?"), and executive functioning (e.g. "have trouble getting things organized?"). Every item is rated on a scale of 0 (Never) to 4 (Almost always) to yield a sum score of 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater severity of cognitive symptoms.
2.5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rumination Response Scale
Time Frame: 2.5 years
The Rumination Response Scale (RRS; Treynor, Gonzalez, & Nolen-Hoeksema, 2003) is a questionnaire frequently used to assess rumination in depression. The 22-item RRS measures the current degree of ruminative responses to depressed mood.
2.5 years
Montgomery Aasberg Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: 2.5 years
The Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale Self-report (MADRS-S; Svanborg & Åsberg, 2001) is a self-report questionnaire measuring depressive symptoms during the past three days. The MADRS-S consists of 9 items where the following symptoms are rated on a seven-point scale ranging from 0 to 6.
2.5 years
Patient Health Questionaire 9 and 2
Time Frame: 2.5 years
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9: Kroenke et al., 2001) is a self-report tool used to assess the presence and severity of depressive symptoms. Reliability and validity of the tool have indicated it has sound psychometric properties. Internal consistency of the PHQ-9 has been shown to be high.
2.5 years
The Satisfaction With Life Scale
Time Frame: 2.5 years
The SWLS (Kobau et al., 2010) is a short 5-item instrument designed to measure global cognitive judgments of satisfaction with one's life. The scale usually requires only about one minute of a respondent's time.
2.5 years
The Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire
Time Frame: 8 months
The Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (Borkovec & Nau, 1972) measures treatment credibility and expectancy. Participants rated perceived treatment credibility and expectancy on a scale from 0 to 10 were higher scores indicated better treatment credibility or expectancy.
8 months
Log-ins
Time Frame: 8 months
Number of sessions were participants have logged into the intervention during the intervention period.
8 months
Session length
Time Frame: 8 months.
Average length of each log-in during the intervention period.
8 months.
Days in treatment
Time Frame: 8 months
Number of days in intervention from receiving intervention until completion.
8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tine Nordgreen, PhD, Projectleader

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on RestDep: Internet-delivered intervention targeting residual cognitive symptoms

Subscribe