A Single Arm Pilot Study to Refine a Novel Approach to Exercise Promotion Based on Affect-regulation

July 7, 2023 updated by: Courtney J. Stevens, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Increasing Physical Activity Among Breast Cancer Survivors: Use of the ORBIT Model to Refine and Test a Novel Approach to Exercise Promotion Based on Affect-regulation

The purpose of this study is to refine the use of an affect-regulated exercise prescription for use with survivors of breast cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Within 5 years of completing curative treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation) for stage 0-III breast cancer
  • <60 mins/week moderate-vigorous physical activity with no major changes for the past 6-months
  • Own an Android or iPhone smartphone and willing to use the smartphone to complete app-based surveys during assessment periods
  • Willing to wear the ActiGraph monitor during assessment periods
  • Access to internet to complete REDCap survey assessments

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-English speaking/not able to read English
  • Evidence of major contraindications for exercise (informed by the 2020 Physical Activity Readiness-Questionnaire (PAR-Q)+)
  • Currently pregnant
  • History of severe mental illness or currently taking mood stabilizing medications (antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, or lithium)
  • Evidence of moderate-severe depressive symptoms (indicated by a score ≥10 on Patient Health Questionnaire-8)
  • Evidence of moderate-severe cognitive impairment (indicated by a score < 3 on a 6-item cognitive screener)
  • Evidence of clinically significant substance use as indicated by a score of ≥2 on the CAGE-AID screener

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Affect-regulated exercise prescription
Participants receive instructions to adjust their pace of exercise so that they feel "fairly good" or better (i.e., a rating of +1 or higher on the Feeling Scale) while exercising and to avoid any increases in intensity that promote feeling "fairly bad" or worse. If no intensity of exercise feels at least "fairly good" participants will be told to exercise at an intensity that feels "as positive as possible."
Participants are instructed to increase weekly time spent exercising to >90 minutes over 12 weeks. Exercise will be defined as "activities that use large muscle groups, increase heart rate and breathing rate, and are performed intentionally for the purpose of exercise (as opposed to physical activities of daily living, e.g., housework). Participants complete a videoconferencing visit with the study team and are given task and safety related information pertaining to exercise for survivors of cancer. Participants engage in exercise-related goal-setting and action planning and are provided activity trackers to monitor their activity levels over the 12-week study period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of the Affect-regulated Exercise Prescription Measured Using the Treatment Acceptability and Preferences (TAP) Measure
Time Frame: 12-weeks follow-up assessment
A 4-item self-report questionnaire used to measure acceptability of the affect-regulated exercise prescription using a Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Total scores range from 0 - 16. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
12-weeks follow-up assessment
Percentage of Sample With Valid Accelerometer Data at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline assessment
The number of participants with valid accelerometer data out of the total number of participants in the sample at baseline, multiplied by 100%.
Baseline assessment
Percentage of Sample With Valid Accelerometer Data at 2-weeks Follow-up
Time Frame: 2-weeks follow-up assessment
The number of participants with valid accelerometer data out of the total number of participants in the sample during the 2-week follow-up assessment, multiplied by 100%.
2-weeks follow-up assessment
Percentage of Sample With Valid Accelerometer Data at 6-weeks Follow-up
Time Frame: 6-weeks follow-up assessment
The number of participants with valid accelerometer data out of the total number of participants in the sample during the 6-week follow-up assessment, multiplied by 100%.
6-weeks follow-up assessment
Percentage of Sample With Valid Accelerometer Data at 12-weeks Follow-up
Time Frame: 12-weeks follow-up assessment
The number of participants with valid accelerometer data out of the total number of participants in the sample during the 12-week follow-up assessment, multiplied by 100%.
12-weeks follow-up assessment
Percentage of Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Survey Prompt Completion
Time Frame: Baseline through 12-weeks follow-up assessments
The percentage of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) survey prompts completed by participants during the study out of the total number of EMA survey prompts delivered to participants.
Baseline through 12-weeks follow-up assessments
Number of Participants Who Completed the Exit Interview
Time Frame: 12-weeks follow-up assessment
Semi-structured interview to assess participants' perceptions regarding their experience participating in the study.
12-weeks follow-up assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Minutes of Daily Moderate-vigorous Physical Activity Measured Using the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT Accelerometer at 12 Weeks Follow-up
Time Frame: 12-weeks follow-up assessment
The research grade ActiGraph wGT3X-BT model is a valid measure of physical activity intensity and duration among multiple populations, including breast cancer survivors. Minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity will be collected from the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT every day for 10-days. Average minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity completed per day of valid wear time will be calculated.
12-weeks follow-up assessment
Satisfaction With Study Participation as Measured by the Participant Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12-weeks follow-up assessment
An 8-item self-report questionnaire used to assess participant satisfaction with study participation using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4 . Scores are summed and then averaged; total scores range from 1- 4. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.
12-weeks follow-up assessment
Study Retention at 2-weeks Follow-up
Time Frame: 2-weeks follow-up assessment
Number of participants who complete the 2-week follow-up assessment out of the number of participants who enroll in the study.
2-weeks follow-up assessment
Study Retention at 6-weeks Follow-up
Time Frame: 6-weeks follow-up assessment
Number of participants who complete the 6-week follow-up assessment out of the number of participants who enroll in the study.
6-weeks follow-up assessment
Study Retention at 12-weeks Follow-up
Time Frame: 12-weeks follow-up assessment
Number of participants who complete the 12-week follow-up assessment out of the number of participants who enroll in the study.
12-weeks follow-up assessment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change Overtime in Cancer-related Fatigue Measured Using the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 8a
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
An 8-item self-report measure with response options ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) and fatigue interference ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (always) over the past 7 days. Total scores range from 8 - 40. Higher scores reflect more fatigue.
Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
Change Overtime in Health-related Quality of Life Measured Using the PROMIS Global Health Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
A 10-item self-report measure with response options ranging from 1 (poor/never/not at all) to 5 (excellent/completely/always) for items 1-9 and 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) for the item 10. Total scores range from 9 - 45. Higher scores represent better health-related quality of life.
Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
Change Overtime in Physical Functioning Measured Using The PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 8a
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
An 8-item self-report measure with response options ranging from 1 (unable to do) to 5 (without any difficulty) and the degree to which health limits specific activities on a scale from 1 (cannot do) to 5 (not at all). Total scores range from 8 - 40. Higher scores reflect better physical function.
Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
Average Minutes of Daily Moderate-vigorous Physical Activity Measured Using The Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire at 2 Weeks Follow up
Time Frame: 2-weeks follow-up assessment
The Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire is a brief self-report measure that asks participants to report how many minutes they spent participating in moderate and vigorous physical activity on a given day. Participants will report total minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity completed per day for 10-days. Average minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity completed per day will be calculated.
2-weeks follow-up assessment
Average Minutes of Daily Moderate-vigorous Physical Activity Measured Using The Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire at 6 Weeks Follow up
Time Frame: 6-weeks follow-up assessment
The Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire is a brief self-report measure that asks participants to report how many minutes they spent participating in moderate and vigorous physical activity on a given day. Participants will report total minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity completed per day for 10-days. Average minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity completed per day will be calculated.
6-weeks follow-up assessment
Average Minutes of Daily Moderate-vigorous Physical Activity Measured Using The Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire at 12 Weeks Follow up
Time Frame: 12-weeks follow-up assessment
The Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire is a brief self-report measure that asks participants to report how many minutes they spent participating in moderate and vigorous physical activity on a given day. Participants will report total minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity completed per day for 10-days. Average minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity completed per day will be calculated.
12-weeks follow-up assessment
Average Minutes of Daily Moderate-vigorous Physical Activity Measured Using the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT Accelerometer at 2 Weeks Follow-up
Time Frame: 2-weeks follow-up assessment
The research grade ActiGraph wGT3X-BT model is a valid measure of physical activity intensity and duration among multiple populations, including breast cancer survivors. Minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity will be collected from the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT every day for 10-days. Average minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity completed per day of valid wear time will be calculated.
2-weeks follow-up assessment
Average Minutes of Daily Moderate-vigorous Physical Activity Measured Using the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT Accelerometer at 6 Weeks Follow-up
Time Frame: 6-weeks follow-up assessment
The research grade ActiGraph wGT3X-BT model is a valid measure of physical activity intensity and duration among multiple populations, including breast cancer survivors. Minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity will be collected from the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT every day for 10-days. Average minutes of moderate-vigorous physical activity completed per day of valid wear time will be calculated.
6-weeks follow-up assessment
Change in Voluntary Exercise Behavior Measured Using The Voluntary Exercise Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
A 6-item self-report measure of exercise performed over the last month and week. Two items range from 1 (never) to 7 (often) and four items range from 0 (0 days per week) to 7 (7 days per week). Total scores range from 2-21. Higher scores reflect higher levels of voluntary exercise behavior.
Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
Change in Physical Activity Category Completed in the Past Month Measured Using the Stanford Leisure-Time Activity Categorical Item (L-Cat)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
A single item self-report measure that present six statements describing various levels of monthly physical activity. Response options range from 1 (I did not do much physical activity) to 5 (I did vigorous activities almost daily). Total scores range from 1-5. Higher scores reflect more vigorous, more frequent physical activities completed in the past month.
Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
Change in Intentions to Engage in Physical Activity Measured Using The Exercise Intentions Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
A 5-item self-report measure of intentions to engage in physical activity. Response options range from 1 (not at all likely) to 7 (very likely). Responses are summed and then averaged; total scores range from 1-7. Higher scores represent stronger intentions to engage in physical activity.
Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
Change in Self-efficacy for Exercise Measured Using The Barriers Specific Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
A 13-item self-report measure of one's perceived capability to exercise regularly despite commonly identified barriers to participation. Response options range from 0 (not at all confident) to 100 (highly confident). Responses are summed and then averaged; total scores range from 0% - 100%, higher scores represent greater self-efficacy for exercise.
Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
Change in Intrinsic Motivation for Exercise Measured Using The Behavioral Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
A 4-item self-report scale depicting intrinsic motivation for exercise. Response options range from 0 (not true for me) to 4 (very true for me). Responses are summed and then averaged; total scores range from 0-4. Higher scores indicate greater intrinsic motivation for exercise.
Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
Change in Affective Attitudes About Exercise Using The Instrumental and Affective Attitudes About Exercise Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
A 4-item self-report measure of affective attitudes for exercise. Response options range from -5 to 5. Responses are summed and then averaged; total scores range from -5 to 5. Higher scores more favorable affective attitudes about exercise.
Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
Change in Instrumental Attitudes About Exercise Using The Instrumental and Affective Attitudes About Exercise Scale
Time Frame: Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments
A 4-item self-report measure of instrumental attitudes for exercise. Response options range from -5 to 5. Responses are summed and then averaged; total scores range from -5 to 5. Higher scores more favorable instrumental attitudes about exercise.
Baseline and 12-weeks follow-up assessments

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Courtney J Stevens, PhD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 10, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 13, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STUDY02000934_1
  • K08CA259632 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Core Exercise Promotion Intervention

Subscribe