- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04904770
Time Performance of Scoop Stretcher Versus Vacuum Mattress for Prehospital Spinal Stabilization
October 23, 2021 updated by: Stuby Loric, Geneve TEAM Ambulances
Time Performance of Scoop Stretcher Versus Vacuum Mattress for Prehospital Spinal Stabilization: Open-Label Simulation-based Randomized Controlled Trial
A simulation-based randomized controlled trial was designed with the objective to assess the time needed to achieve spinal stabilization using a scoop stretcher compared to a vacuum mattress.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A simulation-based randomized controlled trial was designed with the objective to assess the time needed to achieve spinal stabilization using a scoop stretcher compared to a vacuum mattress.
The participants will be recruited among healthcare workers from one Emergency Medical Service.
Then, the participants will first act as patient and undergo spinal stabilization from an other team, afterwards they will have to complete a spinal stabilization either using a scoop stretcher or a vacuum mattress, depending on allocation regarding randomization.
The sessions will be video recorded to allow subsequent assessment.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
15
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Geneva, Switzerland, 1201
- Genève TEAM Ambulances
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- registered paramedics or emergency medical technician (EMT) actually working in the ambulance service.
Exclusion Criteria:
- member of study investigators
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Scoop stretcher
A scoop stretcher will be used as device to perform spinal stabilization
|
Already included in arm/group description
|
|
Active Comparator: Vacuum mattress
A vacuum mattress will be used as device to perform spinal stabilization
|
Already included in arm/group description
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in time to perform the procedure
Time Frame: At study session (real-time assessment), in July or August
|
The time required to complete the procedure from the team leader's order to start, until the device is left up from the ground, measured in seconds.
|
At study session (real-time assessment), in July or August
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of stabilization
Time Frame: At study session (real-time assessment), in July or August
|
Quality of stabilization (accuracy of tightening of restraints belts) regarding the standard operating procedure
|
At study session (real-time assessment), in July or August
|
|
Level of anxiety
Time Frame: 5 minutes after spinal stabilization, on a questionnaire
|
Participants will estimate their level of anxiety on a visual analog scale from 0 = "No anxiety at all" to 10 = "The worst anxiety imaginable".
|
5 minutes after spinal stabilization, on a questionnaire
|
|
Level of comfort
Time Frame: 5 minutes after spinal stabilization, on a questionnaire
|
Participants will estimate their level of comfort on a visual analog scale from 0 = "Very, very comfortable" to 10 = "Very, very uncomfortable".
|
5 minutes after spinal stabilization, on a questionnaire
|
|
Degree of induced dyspnoea or shortness of breath
Time Frame: 5 minutes after spinal stabilization, on a questionnaire
|
Participants will estimate their degree of induced dyspnoea or shortness of breath on a visual analog scale from 0 = "No dyspnoea or shortness of breath" to 10 = "The worst imaginable dyspnoea".
|
5 minutes after spinal stabilization, on a questionnaire
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 10, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 31, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
September 30, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 23, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
May 27, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 26, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 23, 2021
Last Verified
October 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- SSSS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Shared upon request
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Since publication, for 10 years
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Upon request
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Immobilization
-
University College Hospital GalwayCompleted
-
Hospital Universitario La PazCompleted
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompleted
-
University of CopenhagenRadboud University Medical Center; University of Leeds; Johannes Gutenberg University... and other collaboratorsCompletedPhysical Activity | Immobilization, TonicDenmark
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkCompleted
-
AspetarCompletedImmobilization, Tonic | Hot Weather; Adverse EffectQatar
-
Hvidovre University HospitalCompletedImmobilization | Achilles Tendon RuptureDenmark
-
Universidad Catolica de TemucoUniversity of Valencia; Universidad de La FronteraNot yet recruitingImmobilization | Disuse AtrophyChile
-
Eva Prado RoblesCompletedOsteoarthritis Thumb | ImmobilizationSpain
-
The Cooper Health SystemCompletedRange of Motion | Elbow Fracture | ImmobilizationUnited States
Clinical Trials on Scoop stretcher
-
University of NottinghamCompletedPain | Emergency | Medical Device DiscomfortUnited Kingdom
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedOut-of-hospital Cardiac ArrestKorea, Republic of
-
University of MichiganNational Institute on Aging (NIA); Weill Medical College of Cornell University and other collaboratorsRecruitingChronic PainUnited States
-
Hanyang University Seoul HospitalCompletedCardiac ArrestKorea, Republic of
-
Chonnam National University HospitalCompletedAnxiety | Child BehaviorKorea, Republic of
-
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria AragónCompletedEmergencies | Nursing Caries | Venous PunctureSpain
-
Hannover Medical SchoolNot yet recruiting
-
Research in Real-Life LtdTeva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.CompletedAsthma