Comparison of Squat-to-Stand Maneuver With Amyl Nitrite, Valsalva, and Exercise Stress Echocardiography in Inducing Latent Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

December 24, 2021 updated by: Jeffrey B. Geske, Mayo Clinic
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of squat-to-stand maneuver in eliciting left ventricular outflow gradients in patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) compared to Valsalva, amyl nitrite inhalation, and exercise stress echocardiogram (ESE).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Left ventricular hypertrophy and abnormal ventricular configuration result in dynamic left ventricular outflow obstruction in ~75% of HCM patients, which is associated with increased cardiac morbidity and mortality. However, the dynamic nature of the gradient can make obstruction difficult to identify. Provocative maneuvers such as Valsalva maneuver, administration of amyl nitrite, and ESE are currently used to assess for obstruction.

A shortage of amyl nitrite beginning in December 2018 spurred a search for alternative provocative maneuvers. Beginning in February 2019, the Mayo Clinic echocardiography laboratory began utilizing a squat-to-stand maneuver as an alternative to amyl nitrite inhalation. Anecdotally, the squat-to-stand maneuver, which decreases both preload and afterload, has been successful in provoking latent left ventricular outflow obstruction. A retrospective study (Peng et al, in progress) studying 119 patients who performed the squat-to-stand maneuver between February and September 2019 demonstrated squat-to-stand to be a more robust provocative maneuver than the Valsalva maneuver for identifying severe dynamic left ventricular obstruction with Doppler echocardiography. Squat-to-stand elicited latent obstruction in a greater proportion of the study participants and higher average gradients. It also demonstrated the potential to alter clinical management - six patients had severe obstruction only with squat-to-stand (otherwise would not have been diagnosed) and subsequently underwent septal reduction surgery.

The recent return of amyl nitrite to the echocardiography laboratory creates an opportunity for direct comparison with squat-to-stand, particularly regarding cost savings and diagnostic performance. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and degree of provocation of left ventricular outflow gradients by the squat-to-stand maneuver compared to amyl nitrite inhalation in patients with HCM undergoing echocardiography. Squat-to-stand will also be compared with other provocation methods, including Valsalva maneuver, which should be performed on every patient going on to squat-to-stand, and ESE when available. Validating this novel provocative maneuver can broaden the toolbox of techniques used to elicit left ventricular outflow gradients and improve clinical evaluation and management of symptomatic HCM patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults ≥ 18 y/o referred for an outpatient echocardiogram.
  • Clinical diagnosis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM).
  • Both amyl nitrite inhalation and squat-to-stand maneuver performed during echocardiogram.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients < 18 at the time of echocardiogram.
  • Studies without documented provocative maneuvers.
  • Patients with resting obstruction (MIG > 50 mmHg).
  • Patients unable to undergo the squat-to-stand as protocolled based because of physical limitations.
  • Patient with contraindications to amyl nitrite administration.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Subjects with a documented diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) will have an echocardiogram at rest followed by an echocardiogram with Valsalva maneuver as part of regular care. If these tests show no severe obstruction, subjects will continue with both squat-to-stand and amyl nitrite.
Subjects will squat for 5 seconds and then stand. The squat-to-stand exercise will be done up to 10 times, and then immediately undergo echocardiographic imaging.
Subjects will inhale amyl nitrite prior to undergoing echocardiographic imaging. This is administered according to current laboratory protocol and is part of standard of care. This is an FDA-regulated drug that will be used as a control and will not be studied experimentally.
Subjects will undergo echocardiographic imaging while performing the Valsalva maneuver. This is according to current laboratory protocol and is part of standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severe provokable obstruction
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of patients with provokable obstruction (rest gradient < 30 mmHg AND gradient w/ maneuver ≥ 30 mmHg) by provocation technique
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximal instantaneous gradient
Time Frame: Baseline
Maximal instantaneous gradient (MIG) by provocation technique measured in mm Hg
Baseline
Completion of squat-to-stand maneuver
Time Frame: Baseline
Percentage of patients unable to complete a squat-to-stand maneuver
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey Geske, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Clinical Trials on Squat-to-stand maneuver

Subscribe