HydroCoil Cerebral Aneurysm Treatment Trial (HCAT)

December 11, 2014 updated by: University of Virginia
The study will compare clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients receiving Hydrocoil aneurysm treatment versus patients receiving non-HydroCoil aneurysm treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

With prospective, randomized trials in progress evaluating the effectiveness of Hydrocoils and Cerecyte coils in comparison to bare platinum coils, the next step is a direct comparison of Hydrocoils and non-HydroCoils (Cerecyte or Platinum). Considering the increased costs to society of treatment with these new coils, it is essential that the benefits of the new technology are properly evaluated against the existing platinum coil technology in a scientifically valid manner.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

215

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Carmichael, California, United States
        • Mercy Stroke Center
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
        • University of Southern California
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States
        • University of Florida
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States
        • Saint Louis University
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States
        • St. Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital Center
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States
        • Oregon Health and Science University
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States
        • Medical College of South Carolina
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States
        • University of Texas Southwest Medical Center
      • Houston, Texas, United States
        • The Methodist Research Institute
    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • University of Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States
        • Sentara Norfolk General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient presenting with a ruptured or un-ruptured cerebral aneurysm appropriate for endovascular treatment as determined by the neurovascular team (neurosurgeon/neurointerventionalist)
  2. The neurointerventionalist believes that the aneurysm can be safely treated with either Cerecyte or Hydrogel.
  3. Patients between (and including) 21 and 90 years of age.
  4. Patient HUNT AND HESS Grade 0-3.
  5. Patient has given fully informed consent to endovascular coiling procedure. If patient cannot consent for themselves, appropriate written consent has been sought from their next of kin, or from appropriate power of attorney.
  6. Aneurysm 5-20mm in maximum diameter.
  7. Patient is willing and able to return for clinical evaluation and follow-up imaging evaluation (angiography or MRA) at both 6-months and 12-18 months after endovascular treatment.
  8. The patient has not been previously randomized into this or another related ongoing trial.
  9. The aneurysm has not previously been treated (by coiling or clipping).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient has more than one aneurysm requiring treatment in the current treatment session If a patient has multiple aneurysms, but only one will be treated at the time of enrollment, they are eligible for the trial. (Additional aneurysms may be treated at a later date, and may be treated with any coil type that the operator chooses).
  2. Target aneurysm has had previous coil treatment or surgically clipped.
  3. Patient has an H&H score of 4 or 5 after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH).
  4. Inability to obtain informed consent.
  5. Medical or surgical co-morbidity such that the patient's life expectancy is less than 1 year.

    -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: MicroVention Hydrogel Coils
FDA approved and in common use for cerebral aneurysm treatment.
Micro Vention Hydrogel Coils
Active Comparator: Non-hydrogel coils
Cerecyte or bare platinum coils (FDA approved and in common use for treatment of cerebral aneurysm).
Cerecyte or bare platinum coils

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occlusion rate
Time Frame: 12 - 18 months
Angiographic occlusion, improvement or no change in the post-coiling appearance of the aneurysm as judged by an independent core lab on follow-up angiography at 12-18 months after endovascular treatment.
12 - 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment related morbidity and mortality
Time Frame: 12-18 months
Treatment related morbidity and mortality, as measured by the NIH stroke scale;
12-18 months
Packing density
Time Frame: 12-18 months
Packing density as measured by volumetric filling of the aneurysm.
12-18 months
Clinical outcome
Time Frame: 6 months
Clinical outcome as measured by Modified Rankin Scale
6 months
Clinical Outcome
Time Frame: 12-18 months
Clinical outcome as measured by the Modified Rankin scale
12-18 months
Re-bleed rates
Time Frame: 12-18 months
Comparison of rebleed rates at 12-18 months
12-18 months
Re-treatment rates
Time Frame: 12-18 months
Comparison of re-treatment rates at 12-18 months post treatment.
12-18 months
Cost of treatment
Time Frame: 12-18 months
Comparison of cost of treatment.
12-18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

September 3, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2014

Last Verified

December 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intracerebral Aneursym

Clinical Trials on MicroVention Hydrogel coil

Subscribe