- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04915950
A Study to Assess the Effect of Oral Temanogrel on Digital Blood Flow in Adult Participants With Raynaud's Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic Sclerosis
December 1, 2023 updated by: Pfizer
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study to Assess the Effect of Oral Temanogrel on Digital Blood Flow in Subjects With Raynaud's Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic Sclerosis
The purpose of this study is to determine whether oral temanogrel improves digital blood flow in participants with Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis (SSc-RP) as a potential safe and effective treatment for symptoms associated with SSc-RP.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study will be conducted in 2 stages: Stage A and Stage B. In both stages, participants will be equally randomized in a double-blind manner to a 3-period crossover treatment sequence.
Separate cohorts of participants will participate in each stage.
In Stage A, participants will be treated with two dose levels of temanogrel and placebo.
Doses in Stage B will be determined based on the results of Stage A.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
13
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bath, United Kingdom, BAI 3NG
- Royal United Hospitals Bath
-
Salford, United Kingdom, M6 8HD
- Salford Royal Hospital
-
-
Scotland
-
Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom, DD1 9SY
- Ninewells Hospital & Medical School
-
-
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06519
- Yale University
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
- Johns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
- UPMC Arthritis and Auotimmune Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Raynaud's phenomenon (defined as a history of digital cold sensitivity associated with color changes of cyanosis and pallor, with on average at least 5 attacks per week during the winter period) secondary to systemic sclerosis (SSc)
- Both men and women participants agree to use a highly effective method of birth control if the possibility of conception exists
- Body mass index 18.0 to 40.0 kilograms per square meter (kg/m^2), inclusive
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active digital ulcer(s), recent history (within 3 months of Screening) of digital ulcers, or history of recurrent digital ulcerations that in the opinion of the Investigator increase the likelihood of developing a digital ulcer during the course of the study. Any history of gangrene, amputations, or other critical digital ischemic event
- Raynaud's phenomenon due to any cause other than SSc
- Severe gastrointestinal complications related to SSc that in the opinion of the Investigator could significantly affect study drug absorption
- History of gastrointestinal bleeding or active gastric or duodenal ulcers
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Temanogrel (Stage A Dose 1)
|
Participants will receive a single oral dose of temanogrel during the treatment visit.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Temanogrel (Stage A Dose 2)
|
Participants will receive a single oral dose of temanogrel during the treatment visit.
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (Stage A)
|
Participants will receive a single oral dose of temanogrel matching placebo during the treatment visit.
|
|
Experimental: Temanogrel (Stage B Dose 1)
|
Participants will receive a single oral dose of temanogrel during the treatment visit.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Temanogrel (Stage B Dose 2)
|
Participants will receive a single oral dose of temanogrel during the treatment visit.
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo (Stage B)
|
Participants will receive a single oral dose of temanogrel matching placebo during the treatment visit.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Digital Blood Flow Based on Rewarming Area Under the Curve (AUC) During Thirty Minutes Following a Cold Challenge
Time Frame: 30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
Area under the curve for rewarming of digital blood flow after 30 minutes following a cold challenge was assessed.
Area under the curve was defined as the area under the skin temperature curve and rewarming was a delicate phase of therapeutic hypothermia (TH).
A cold challenge was conducted by immersing the hands in a temperature-controlled water bath (15 [+/- 1] degree celsius) for one minute, followed by post-cold challenge digital blood flow assessments for 30 minutes.
Rewarming was assessed by infrared (IR) thermography which was an indirect method for evaluation of blood flow based on imaging skin temperature.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
|
Change in Digital Blood Flow Based on Reperfusion AUC During the Thirty Minutes Following a Cold Challenge
Time Frame: 30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
Area under the curve for reperfusion of digital blood flow after 30 minutes following a cold challenge was assessed.
A cold challenge was conducted by immersing hands in a temperature-controlled water bath (15 [+/- 1] degree celsius) for one minute, followed by post-cold challenge digital blood flow assessments for 30 minutes.
Reperfusion was assessed with laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) which was based on differences in the speckle pattern (occurring when laser light illuminates a tissue) due to movement of blood cells.
LSCI therefore provides quantitative measures of blood flow within predefined region of interests (ROIs) as mean arbitrary perfusion units, pu.
Higher values of pu (and also pu*seconds) are considered better in the context of this trial.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Reduction in Temperature Following a Cold Challenge Assessed With Infrared (IR) Thermography
Time Frame: 30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
IR thermography was an indirect method for evaluation of blood flow based on imaging skin temperature.
A cold challenge was conducted by immersing the hands in a temperature-controlled water bath (15 [+/- 1] degree celsius) for one minute, followed by post-cold challenge digital blood flow assessments for 30 minutes.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
|
Maximum Reduction in Perfusion Temperature Following a Cold Challenge With Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging (LSCI)
Time Frame: 30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
A cold challenge was conducted by immersing the hands in a temperature-controlled water bath (15 [+/- 1] degree celsius) for one minute, followed by post-cold challenge digital blood flow assessments for 30 minutes.
LSCI was based on differences in the speckle pattern (occurring when laser light illuminates a tissue) due to movement of blood cells.
LSCI therefore provides quantitative measures of blood flow within predefined region of interests (ROIs) as mean arbitrary perfusion units, pu.
Higher values of pu are considered better in the context of this trial.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
|
Maximum Recovery in Temperature Following a Cold Challenge Assessed With IR Thermography
Time Frame: 30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
IR thermography was an indirect method for evaluation of blood flow based on imaging skin temperature.
Changes in skin temperature at each visit were imaged IR thermography.
A cold challenge was conducted by immersing the hands in a temperature-controlled water bath (15 [+/- 1] degree celsius) for one minute, followed by post-cold challenge digital blood flow assessments for 30 minutes.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
|
Maximum Recovery in Perfusion Temperature Following a Cold Challenge Assessed With LSCI
Time Frame: 30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
A cold challenge was conducted by immersing the hands in a temperature-controlled water bath (15 [+/- 1] degree celsius) for one minute, followed by post-cold challenge digital blood flow assessments for 30 minutes.
LSCI was based on differences in the speckle pattern (occurring when laser light illuminates a tissue) due to movement of blood cells.
Changes in skin temperature at each visit were imaged using LSCI.
LSCI therefore provides quantitative measures of blood flow within predefined region of interests (ROIs) as mean arbitrary perfusion units, pu.
Higher values of pu are considered better in the context of this trial.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
|
AUC During the Initial Two Minutes Following a Cold Challenge Assessed With IR Thermography
Time Frame: Initial 2 minutes following a cold challenge
|
AUC was defined as the area under the skin temperature curve.
IR thermography was an indirect method for evaluation of blood flow based on imaging skin temperature.
A cold challenge was conducted by immersing the hands in a temperature-controlled water bath (15 [+/- 1] degree celsius) for one minute, followed by post-cold challenge digital blood flow assessments.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
Initial 2 minutes following a cold challenge
|
|
Perfusion AUC During the Initial Two Minutes Following a Cold Challenge Assessed With LSCI
Time Frame: Initial 2 minutes following a cold challenge
|
A cold challenge was conducted by immersing the hands in a temperature-controlled water bath (15 [+/- 1] degree celsius) for one minute, followed by post-cold challenge digital blood flow assessments.
LSCI was based on differences in the speckle pattern (occurring when laser light illuminates a tissue) due to movement of blood cells.
LSCI therefore provides quantitative measures of blood flow within predefined region of interests (ROIs) as mean arbitrary perfusion units, pu.
Higher values of pu (and also pu*seconds) are considered better in the context of this trial.
AUC was defined as the area under the skin temperature curve, based on the LSCI results.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
Initial 2 minutes following a cold challenge
|
|
Slope During the Initial 2 Minutes (120 Seconds) Following a Cold Challenge Assessed With IR Thermography
Time Frame: Initial 2 minutes following a cold challenge
|
IR thermography was an indirect method for evaluation of blood flow based on imaging skin temperature.
A cold challenge was conducted by immersing the hands in a temperature-controlled water bath (15 [+/- 1] degree celsius) for 60 seconds, followed by post-cold challenge digital blood flow assessments.
Slope was calculated based on the changes in skin temperature imaged using LSCI and IR thermography during the initial 120 seconds following the cold challenge.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
Initial 2 minutes following a cold challenge
|
|
Perfusion Slope During the Initial 2 Minutes (120 Seconds) Following a Cold Challenge Assessed With LSCI
Time Frame: Initial 2 minutes following a cold challenge
|
A cold challenge was conducted by immersing the hands in a temperature-controlled water bath (15 [+/- 1] degree celsius) for 60 seconds, followed by post-cold challenge digital blood flow assessments.
LSCI was based on differences in the speckle pattern (occurring when laser light illuminates a tissue) due to movement of blood cells.
LSCI therefore provides quantitative measures of blood flow within predefined region of interests (ROIs) as mean arbitrary perfusion units, pu.
Higher values of pu (and also pu/seconds) are considered better in the context of this trial.
Slope was calculated based on the changes in skin temperature imaged using LSCI during the initial 120 seconds following the cold challenge.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
Initial 2 minutes following a cold challenge
|
|
Time to Achieve 50 Percent (%) Recovery From the Cold Challenge-Induced Reduction Assessed With IR Thermography and With LSCI
Time Frame: 30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
IR thermography was an indirect method for evaluation of blood flow based on imaging skin temperature, while LSCI was based on differences in the speckle pattern (occurring when laser light illuminates a tissue) due to movement of blood cells.
A cold challenge was conducted by immersing the hands in a temperature-controlled water bath (15 [+/- 1] degree celsius) for one minute, followed by post-cold challenge digital blood flow assessments.
If 50% recovery was not achieved, the recovery time was set to 30 minutes.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
|
Time to Achieve 70 % Recovery From the Cold Challenge-Induced Reduction Assessed With IR Thermography and With LSCI
Time Frame: 30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
IR thermography was an indirect method for evaluation of blood flow based on imaging skin temperature, while LSCI was based on differences in the speckle pattern (occurring when laser light illuminates a tissue) due to movement of blood cells.
A cold challenge was conducted by immersing the hands in a temperature-controlled water bath (15 [+/- 1] degree celsius) for one minute, followed by post-cold challenge digital blood flow assessments.
If 70% recovery was not achieved, the recovery time was set to 30 minutes.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
30 minutes following a cold challenge
|
|
Change From Predose to Post-dose in Room Temperature Values as Assessed With IR Thermography
Time Frame: 5 minutes pre-dose, 5 minutes post-dose
|
IR thermography was an indirect method for evaluation of blood flow based on imaging skin temperature.
Digital blood flow was assessed at each treatment visit at Predose for 5 minutes at room temperature, and at post-dose prior to cold challenge for 5 minutes at room temperature.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
5 minutes pre-dose, 5 minutes post-dose
|
|
Change From Predose to Post-dose in Room Temperature Perfusion Values as Assessed With LSCI
Time Frame: 5 minutes pre-dose, 5 minutes post-dose
|
Digital blood flow was assessed at each treatment visit at Predose for 5 minutes at room temperature, and at post-dose prior to cold challenge for 5 minutes at room temperature.
LSCI was based on differences in the speckle pattern (occurring when laser light illuminates a tissue) due to movement of blood cells.
LSCI therefore provides quantitative measures of blood flow within predefined region of interests (ROIs) as mean arbitrary perfusion units, pu.
Higher values of pu are considered better in the context of this trial.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
5 minutes pre-dose, 5 minutes post-dose
|
|
Change From Predose to Post-dose in Distal Dorsal Difference (DDD), Assessed With IR Thermography
Time Frame: 5 minutes pre-dose, 5 minutes post-dose
|
The distal dorsal difference was defined as the difference in temperature between the dorsum and the finger, from pre dose of study treatment to post-dose.
IR thermography was an indirect method for evaluation of blood flow based on imaging skin temperature.
Digital blood flow was assessed at each treatment visit at Predose for 5 minutes at room temperature, and at postdose prior to cold challenge for 5 minutes at room temperature.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
5 minutes pre-dose, 5 minutes post-dose
|
|
Change From Predose to Post-dose in Distal Dorsal Difference (DDD) [Perfusion], Assessed With LSCI
Time Frame: 5 minutes pre-dose, 5 minutes post-dose
|
Digital blood flow was assessed at each treatment visit at Predose for 5 minutes at room temperature, and at postdose prior to cold challenge for 5 minutes at room temperature.
LSCI was based on differences in the speckle pattern (occurring when laser light illuminates a tissue) due to movement of blood cells.
LSCI therefore provides quantitative measures of blood flow within predefined region of interests (ROIs) as mean arbitrary perfusion units, pu.
Higher values of pu are considered better in the context of this trial.
The distal dorsal difference was defined as the difference in perfusion temperature between the dorsum and the finger, from pre dose of study treatment to post-dose.
Results presented were based on the average across all 8 fingers assessed (left index, left middle, left ring, left little, right index, right middle, right ring, right little).
|
5 minutes pre-dose, 5 minutes post-dose
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Time Frame: Day 1 of dose to maximum of 4 (+/-1) days after last dose (up to maximum of 22 days)
|
An adverse event was any untoward medical occurrence that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment.
TEAE was an AE that occurred after initiation of study treatment that was not present at the time of treatment start or an AE that increased in severity after the initiation of medication, if the event was present at the time of treatment start.
SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or considered medically significant: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly or birth defect.
|
Day 1 of dose to maximum of 4 (+/-1) days after last dose (up to maximum of 22 days)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Pfizer
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 3, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 2, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
September 2, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 1, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
June 7, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 22, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 1, 2023
Last Verified
December 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Skin Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Connective Tissue Diseases
- Embolism and Thrombosis
- Skin Diseases, Vascular
- Thrombosis
- Neoplastic Processes
- Peripheral Vascular Diseases
- Livedoid Vasculopathy
- Sclerosis
- Neoplasm Metastasis
- Scleroderma, Systemic
- Scleroderma, Diffuse
- Raynaud Disease
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Serotonin Agents
- Serotonin 5-HT2 Receptor Antagonists
- Serotonin Antagonists
- APD791
Other Study ID Numbers
- APD791-204
- C5071001 (Other Identifier: Alias Study Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g.
protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions.
Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Raynaud's Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic Sclerosis
-
ActelionCompletedRaynaud's Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic SclerosisGermany, France, United Kingdom
-
NexMed (U.S.A.), Inc. (subsidiary of Apricus Biosciences...CompletedRaynaud's Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic SclerosisUnited States
-
Civi Biopharma, Inc.CompletedRaynaud's Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic SclerosisUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedRaynaud Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic SclerosisFrance
-
Civi Biopharma, Inc.CompletedRaynaud Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic SclerosisUnited States
-
University Hospital, GrenobleCompletedHealthy | Raynaud's Phenomenon Isolated Primary | Raynaud's Phenomenon (Secondary)France
-
Human Stem Cell Institute, RussiaRussian Academy of Medical SciencesUnknownSecondary Raynaud's PhenomenonRussian Federation
-
Covis Pharma S.à.r.l.CompletedRaynaud's Phenomenon Secondary to Connective Tissue DiseaseUnited States
-
Vicore Pharma ABSGS Life Sciences, a division of SGS Belgium NVCompleted
-
Peter KorstenDiaMed GmbHRecruitingSystemic Sclerosis | Scleroderma | Raynaud Phenomenon | Digital UlcerGermany
Clinical Trials on Temanogrel
-
PfizerArena is a wholly owned subsidiary of PfizerTerminatedMicrovascular ObstructionUnited States, Australia, Netherlands, Sweden, United Kingdom
-
IlDong Pharmaceutical Co LtdAsan Medical CenterTerminatedAcute Coronary Syndrome