Intravenous Iloprost in Subjects With Symptomatic Raynaud's Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic Sclerosis (Phase 3)

May 9, 2025 updated by: Civi Biopharma, Inc.

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Iloprost in Subjects With Systemic Sclerosis Experiencing Symptomatic Digital Ischemic Episodes (AURORA Study)

This is a Phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of iloprost on the frequency of and relief from symptomatic digital ischemic episodes in subjects with systemic sclerosis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

198

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85032
        • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research, PLLC
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Mayo Clinic - Scottsdale
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85724
        • University of Arizona - Arthritis Research Center
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90059
        • University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University Medical Center
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California San Francisco
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
        • Georgetown University Medical Center - Department of Rheumatology
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
        • University Medical Center New Orleans
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts Medical Center
    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109-5422
        • University of Michigan
      • Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49546
        • West Michigan Rheumatology PLLC
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55369
        • University of Minnesota Maple Grove
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198
        • University of Nebraska Medical Center
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903
        • Robert Wood Johnson Medical School
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Hospital for Special Surgery
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
        • University of Cincinnati - Scleroderma Center
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43614
        • The University of Toledo Medical Center (UTMC) - Ruppert Health Center
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • University of Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15261
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC)
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • University of Texas Houston - Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunogenetics
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84132
        • University of Utah
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
        • Virginia Mason Medical Center
    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Froedtert Hospital and the Medical College of Wisconsin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female subjects must be greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
  • Subjects must have a diagnosis of Systemic Sclerosis as defined by the 2013 American College of Rheumatology criteria/EULAR criteria
  • Subjects must have a diagnosis or history of Raynaud's Phenomenon, self-reported or reported by a physician, with at least a 2-phase color change in finger(s) of pallor, cyanosis, and/or reactive hyperemia in response to cold exposure or emotion
  • Subjects must have a minimum of 10 symptomatic Raynaud's Phenomenon attacks, documented in the electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) diary, occurring over at least 3 separate days of the 3- to 5-day eligibility period
  • Subjects must complete a minimum of 80% of the daily ePRO diary entry during the baseline period
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential and male subjects must agree to use contraception for the duration of the study.
  • Subjects must be willing and able to comply with the study requirements and give informed consent for participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Subjects with systolic blood pressure <85 mmHg
  • Subjects with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m2
  • Subjects with an alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase value >3 × the upper limit of normal at screening
  • Subjects who have a digital ulcer infection within 30 days of screening
  • Subjects with a history of cervical or digital sympathectomy, or botulism toxin injections in their hands [for RP or digital ulcers] within 90 days of screening. Subjects should not have a planned botulism toxin or sympathectomy during their participation in the study.
  • Subjects with gangrene or digital amputation within 6 months of screening
  • Subjects with current intractable diarrhea or vomiting
  • Subjects with a risk of clinically significant bleeding events, including those with coagulation or platelet disorders at screening
  • Subjects with a history of major trauma or hemorrhage within 30 days of screening.
  • Subjects with clinically significant chronic intermittent bleeding, such as active gastric antral vascular ectasia or active peptic ulcer disease, within 60 days of screening
  • Subjects who have had any cerebrovascular events (eg, transient ischemic attack or stroke) within 6 months of screening
  • Subjects with a history of myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months of screening. Subjects should not have a planned coronary procedure during their participation in the study
  • Subjects with acute or chronic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Class III [moderate] or Class IV [severe]) at screening
  • Subjects with a history of more than mild restrictive or congestive cardiomyopathy uncontrolled by medication or implanted device
  • Subjects with a history of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias
  • Subjects with a history of hemodynamically significant aortic or mitral valve disease
  • Subjects with a history of known pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary arterial hypertension, or pulmonary veno-occlusive disease
  • Subjects with a history of significant restrictive lung disease, defined as forced vital capacity <45% predicted and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide <40% predicted (uncorrected for hemoglobin)
  • Subjects with scleroderma renal crisis within 6 months of screening
  • Subjects with a concomitant life-threatening disease with a life expectancy <12 months
  • Subjects who have a clinically significant disorder that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could contraindicate the administration of study drug, affect compliance, interfere with study evaluations, or confound the interpretation of study results
  • Subjects who have taken or are currently taking any parenteral, inhaled, or oral prostacyclin or prostacyclin receptor agonists (eg, epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost, and selexipag) within 8 weeks of screening
  • Subjects who have initiated or had a dose change of any of the following within 2 weeks of screening: oral, topical, or intravenous (IV) vasodilators (eg, calcium channel blockers, phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors [eg, sildenafil, tadalafil, or vardenafil], nitrates, and fluoxetine)
  • Subjects with any history of acetaminophen intolerability (eg, allergic reaction to acetaminophen)
  • Subjects with any malignancy that requires treatment during the study period, that has required treatment within 1 year of screening (including excision of skin cancer) or that is currently not in remission
  • Subjects who have used any investigational medication or device for any indication within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer)
  • Subjects who have participated in ES-201 or ES-301 studies and were randomized and treated with study drug

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Subjects will receive study drug for 5 consecutive days as an IV infusion over 6 hours each day via a peripheral line. Study drug will be initiated at a starting dose 0.5 ng/kg/min up to 2.0 ng/kg/min.
Study drug will be initiated at a starting dose of 0.5 ng/kg/min up to 2.0 ng/kg/min. Subjects will receive study drug for 5 consecutive days as an IV infusion over 6 hours each day via a peripheral line.
Active Comparator: Iloprost Injection, for intravenous use
Subjects will receive study drug for 5 consecutive days as an IV infusion over 6 hours each day via a peripheral line. Study drug will be initiated at a starting dose 0.5 ng/kg/min up to 2.0 ng/kg/min.
Study drug will be initiated at a starting dose of 0.5 ng/kg/min up to 2.0 ng/kg/min. Subjects will receive study drug for 5 consecutive days as an IV infusion over 6 hours each day via a peripheral line.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Frequency of Symptomatic RP Attacks
Time Frame: From baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end ofthe efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).

The primary efficacy parameter is the change in the weekly frequency of symptomatic RP attacks from baseline.

The baseline weekly frequency of symptomatic RP attacks was defined as the average number of weekly symptomatic RP attacks that occurred during the 10- to 25-day baseline ePRO diary completion period.

The double-blind endpoint weekly frequency of symptomatic RP attacks was defined as the average number of weekly symptomatic RP attacks that occurred during Days 8 to 21, inclusive

From baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end ofthe efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Severity of RP Attack Symptoms
Time Frame: From baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end of the efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).
Change in overall severity of RP attack symptoms as registered in electronic diary. It was measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) as follows: 0 = no pain/numbness/tingling/discomfort, 1 to 3 = mild pain/numbness/tingling/discomfort, 4 to 6 = moderate pain/numbness/tingling/discomfort, and 7 to 10 = severe pain/numbness/tingling/discomfort. The severity of the symptoms (pain, numbness, discomfort or tingling) was rated by the patient in the electronic diary (ePRO). The symptom with the worst average baseline value for each patient was compared to the average severity rate of that symptom which occurred during Days 8 to 21 of the treatment period. If more than 1 symptom had the same value, the symptom used for analysis was based on the following order of rank: pain>numbness>tingling>discomfort.
From baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end of the efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).
Weekly Total Duration of Symptomatic RP Attacks.
Time Frame: From baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end of the efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).

The weekly duration is calculated as the average duration of a systematic RP attack times weekly frequency, as registered in electronic diary.

The baseline weekly duration was calculated as the average duration of a systematic RP attack times weekly frequency during the 10- to 25-day baseline electronic diary completion period.

The end of the efficacy follow-up weekly duration of symptomatic RP attacks is calculated as the average duration of a systematic RP attack times weekly frequency during Days 8 to 21, inclusive.

From baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end of the efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).
Percentage of Responders
Time Frame: From baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end of the efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).

The responders are defined as participants that have at least 50% reduction in weekly total duration of symptomatic RP attacks and at least 50% reduction in overall severity from baseline.

Duration of symptomatic RP attacks and severity of attacks are obtained from electronic diary.

From baseline (Day 10 to Day 25 of screening period) to the end of the efficacy follow-up (Day 8 to Day 21).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Wade Benton, Pharm D, Eicos Sciences, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 14, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 9, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 9, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Raynaud's Phenomenon Secondary to Systemic Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on Placebo IV infusion

Subscribe