Real World Evidence with the Debritom+ TM Novel Micro Water Jet Technology At a Single Wound Center (EVIDENT)

November 19, 2024 updated by: Medaxis, LLC
Prospective, single-blinded, single-center, parallel group, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess rate and frequency of wound healing and associated financial savings, when using Medaxis debritom+ versus standard of care as a choice of debridement method, where both arms follow normal wound care practice in use of advanced wound care treatments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this clinical investigation is to assess the clinical performance of the Medaxis debritom+ versus standard of care (sharp debridement using scalpel) in the real world practice of wound care management in a single center trial by collecting data on wound healing rates over time, success of advanced wound care treatments, and downstream financial costs in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, dehisced surgical wounds and traumatic wounds. Medaxis debritom+TM is an advanced micro fluid jet FDA registered Class II device, which will be used within the cleared intended use of wound therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34208
        • Recruiting
        • MCR Health, Inc.
        • Contact:
          • Melvin B Price, DPM

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

General

Potential subjects are required to meet all of the following criteria for enrollment into the study and subsequent randomization:

  1. At least 18 years old.
  2. The index wound (i.e. current episode of the wound or ulceration) has been present for greater than 4 weeks prior to SV 1 and has had less than 1 year of documented medical treatment, as of the subject's consent for the study participation.
  3. The index wound is a minimum of 1.0 cm2 and a maximum of 25 cm2 at SV1.
  4. Subject understands and is willing to participate in the clinical study and can comply with weekly visits.
  5. Subject must have read and signed the IRB approved Informed Consent Form (ICF) before study specific screening procedures that are not standard of care are undertaken.

    DFU

  6. Presence of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) that meets all of the following features:
  7. Wagner Grade 1 or 2 (see Appendix A for definitions), including wounds that extend to the ligament, tendon, joint capsule or fascia
  8. Without abscess or osteomyelitis
  9. The index ulcer will be the largest ulcer if two or more DFUs are present and will be the only one evaluated in the study. If other ulcerations are present on the same foot, they must be more than 2cm distant from index ulcer (edge to edge).
  10. The index ulcer has been offloaded for at least 14 days prior to randomization
  11. Adequate circulation to the affected foot as documented by a Clarifi SFDI Vascular Assessment Tool, or an Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) between 0.7 and 1.3 within 3 months of SV1, using the affected study extremity. As an alternative, arterial Doppler ultrasound can be performed, evaluating for bi-phasic dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial vessels at the level of the ankle within 3 months of SV1 or if monophasic wave forms present must have adequate micro circulation as evidenced by Clarifi SFDI Vascular Assessment Tool. Note: A documented record of an ABI test performed using the index ulcer leg, within 3 months of SV1 is acceptable for the purposes of this study. Otherwise, this must be completed in the Screening Visit. Acceptable alternatives include arterial Doppler ultrasound evaluating vessels at the level of the ankle, or documented adequate microcirculation as determined by a Clarifi SFDI Vascular Assessment Tool.

    VLU

  12. All wounds using the CEAP VLU Classification, except for those in the exclusion criteria. (See Appendix A for definitions)
  13. The index ulcer will be the largest ulcer if two or more VLUs are present and will be the only one evaluated in the study. If other Ulcerations are present on the same leg, they must be more than 2cm distant from index ulcer.
  14. Adequate circulation to the affected foot as documented by a Clarifi SFDI Vascular Assessment Tool, or an Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) between 0.7 and 1.3 within 3 months of SV1, using the affected study extremity. As an alternative, arterial Doppler ultrasound can be performed, evaluating for bi-phasic dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial vessels at the level of the ankle within 3 months of SV1 or if monophasic wave forms present must have adequate micro circulation as evidenced by Clarifi SFDI Vascular Assessment Tool. Note: A documented record of an ABI test performed using the index ulcer leg, within 3 months of SV1 is acceptable for the purposes of this study. Otherwise, this must be completed in the Screening Visit. Acceptable alternatives include arterial Doppler ultrasound evaluating vessels at the level of the ankle, or documented adequate microcirculation as determined by a Clarifi SFDI Vascular Assessment Tool.

    Surgical Dehisced

  15. All wounds using the Sandy Grading System, except those in the exclusion criteria. (See Appendix A for definitions)

    Traumatic

  16. All wounds as per the CDC Surgical Wound Classification, with the exception of Class IV or dirty infected wounds, SSI - Deep incisional and organ space. (See Appendix A for definitions)

Exclusion Criteria:

General

Potential subjects meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded from enrollment and subsequent randomization:

  1. The index wound, in the opinion of the investigator, is suspicious for cancer or have a positive carcinoma diagnosis.
  2. Subject has a history of more than two weeks of treatment with immune-suppressants (including systemic corticosteroids >10mg daily dose), cytotoxic chemotherapy, or application of topical steroids to the wound surface within 1 month prior to first SV1, or who receive such medications during the screening period or who are anticipated to require such medications during the course of the study.
  3. Subject is taking a selective COX-2 inhibitor, such as Celecoxib, for any condition.
  4. Subject is on any investigational drug(s) or therapeutic device(s) within 30 days preceding SV1.
  5. History of radiation at the wound site (regardless of time since last radiation treatment).
  6. Index wound has been previously treated or will need to be treated with any prohibited therapies (See Section 6 of this protocol for a list of prohibited medications and therapies).
  7. Subject has a previous diagnosis of HIV, Hepatitis C, or other contagious diseases.
  8. Presence of any condition(s) which seriously compromises the subject's ability to complete this study or the subject has a known history of poor adherence with medical treatment.
  9. Subject is pregnant or breast-feeding.
  10. Presence of diabetes with poor metabolic control as documented with an HbA1c >12.0 % within 90 days of randomization.
  11. Subject has end-stage renal disease as evidenced by a serum creatinine > 3.0mg/dL within 6 months of randomization.
  12. BMI >55
  13. PAR experiences a >30% change between SV1 and SV2 DFU
  14. Wagner 2 wounds that require debridement of bone.
  15. Osteomyelitis or bone infection of the affected foot as verified by x-ray, CAT Scan, or MRI within 30 days prior to randomization (In the event of an ambiguous diagnosis, the Principal Investigator will make the final decision).

    VLU

  16. Exclude

    1. Secondary post thrombotic
    2. Venous Obstruction
    3. Venous Obstruction with reflux
    4. Lipodermato sclerosis or atrophic blanche
  17. Osteomyelitis or bone infection of the affected leg as verified by x-ray, CAT Scan, or MRI within 30 days prior to randomization (In the event of an ambiguous diagnosis, the Principal Investigator will make the final decision).

    Surgical Dehisced

  18. Using the Sandy Grading System for Surgical Wound Dehiscence: Wounds Grade 3 where organs are exposed, and 3a, where the infection is severe as deemed by the Principal Investigator.

    Traumatic

  19. Using CDC Surgical Wound Classification, exclude

    1. Class IV - dirty infected wounds
    2. SSI - Deep incisional and organ space

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: debritom+
Group 1: Medaxis debritom+
debritom+ water jet debridement
Active Comparator: Sharp Scalpel
Group 2: SOC (Sharp Scalpel Debridement)
Sharp Scalpel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound Closure
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Time to heal
20 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Incidence of all index wound-related complications (eg. cellulitis or Infection), hospitalization, wound recurrence
20 weeks
Advanced Wound Care Treatments
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Number of successful advanced wound care treatments placed (eg. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy /grafts)
20 weeks
Cost
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Cost of Treatment (including Advance Wound Care) and including any index wound-related, event-driven complications using patient records or Medicare reimbursement method.
20 weeks
Healed Proportion
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Proportion of wounds completely healed
20 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Unhealed Proportion
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Proportion of wounds not completely healed
20 weeks
PAR
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Percent Area Reduction of Wound
20 weeks
AWC Failure
Time Frame: 20 weeks
Number of failures in regard to advanced wound care treatments
20 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Melvin B Price, DPM, MCR Health Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 29, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Clinical Trials on Study Device Debridement

Subscribe