Predictors and Prognostic Factors of Gullian Barrie Syndrome Outcome

December 7, 2022 updated by: Mohamed Zayed Saber, Assiut University

This study aims to identify clinical and biological determinants and factors that predict outcome including primary outcome (percentage of changes in clinical scales pre- and after 3 months ) and secondary outcome depending on neurophysiologiacal studies and prognostic factors in individual patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome i individuals managed by plasmapheresis and IVIG immunoglobulin .

This information will be used to understand the diversity in clinical presentation and response to treatment of GBS.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute onset, monophasic, immune-mediated peripheral nerve and root disorder (termed polyradiculoneuropathy), GBS has become the most common cause of acute flaccid paralysis worldwide and is a neurological emergency .Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) encompasses group of acute immune-mediated disordes restricted to peripheral nerves and roots. Good circumstantial evidence exists for a pathogenic role for molecular mimicry in GBS pathogenesis,especially with its axonal forms, providing insights that could guide future immunotherapy :Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and plasma exchange (PE) .

Clinical presentation is a sudden onset of rapidly progressive and symmetrical weakness of the limbs, with or without peripheral sensory disturbance, reduction in or loss of tendon reflexes , and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis showing elevated protein concentrations with a normal white cell count, termed albuminocytologic dissociation, to distinguish it from infections that typically demonstrate elevated protein and white cell counts. The symptoms typically reach maximal severity within four weeks from symptom onset. Most patients generally require hospitalization for treatment, with close cardiopulmonary monitoring performed. Many patients also develop symptoms or signs of autonomic nervous system dysfunction, termed dysautonomia. These commonly consist of sinus tachycardia, arrhythmias,, orthostatic hypotension, increased sweating and bladder and gastrointestinal dysfunction.

Antecedent infections, typically within 4 weeks of neurological symptom onset, commonly occur in GBS patients, resulting in the commonly cited molecular mimicry hypothesis, in which the immune system becomes activated in response to infectious antigen with structural similarity to peripheral nerve myelin or axonal components, with resultant tissue-specific peripheral nerve and nerve root injury in susceptible individuals.

Epidemiological data implies that about two-thirds of GBS adult patients had a prior respiratory or gastrointestinal infection.Pathophysiology and immunopathology of the preceding infections are pathogenically associated with GBS, and may play an essential role in triggering the initial peripheral nerve/ nerve root-specific systemic immune system activation that causes cross-reactive humoral and cellular immune responses with resultant demyelination, axonal injury or both involving peripheral nerves and roots.

Optimal treatment of individual patients may depend on the pathogenesis and clinical severity. Patients with severe forms of GBS may possibly need more intensive treatment to recover. Patients with a milder course that fully recover after standard therapy could suffer from possibly more side effects of more aggressive forms of treatment. This could only be possible if there are prognostic models that accurately predict the clinical course in individual patients. Ideally such models should be based on clinical and biological predictors that are strongly associated with disease course and known as early as possible in the acute phase of illness, when treatment with immunomodulatory therapy is most effective. Prognostic models could help to guide selective trials in specific GBS subtypes. Because of this it will be possible to treat GBS with more effective and more individual therapy

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Assiut
      • Assuit, Assiut, Egypt
        • Assiut University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Guillian Barre syndrome ( GBS ) is a rare disease , its incidence nearly , 0.8 - 1.8 case / 100000 population ( 16,17) .

Total coverage of patients with ( GBS ) fitting inclusion criteria and seeking care at Neuro-psychiatric clinics or admitted at Neuro-psychiatry hospital through one year duration about 3 -4 cases per month (36 -38 case per year ) .

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any Age, recent onset of GBS through the first 2 weeks . Gender: Male or Female Inclusion Criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with metabolic disorders, others

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
clinical scales :The GBS Disability Scale
Time Frame: change from baseline scale at 3 months
the percentage of changes in clinical scales pre- and 3 months after treatment depending on clinical assessment scales : The GBS Disability Scale has six levels: 0 points (healthy), 1 point (minor symptoms and capable of running), 2 points (able to walk 10 m without assistance but unable to run), 3 points (able to walk 10 m across an open space with help), 4 points(bedridden or wheelchair-bound), 5points (requiring assisted ventilation for at least part of the day), and 6 points (dead).
change from baseline scale at 3 months
Clinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score )
Time Frame: change from baseline scale at 3 months
Clinical grading scale MRC ( medial research council sum score ) from zero ( no power ) up to 60 full power : sum score of muscle power in both upper limbs and lower limbs in points .
change from baseline scale at 3 months
ERASMUS GBS respiratory insufficiency score EGRIS :
Time Frame: change from baseline scale at 3 months

ERASMUS GBS respiratory insufficiency score EGRIS :

Predict the probability of respiratory insufficiency within the first week of admission, in individual patients with Guillain-Barre . syndrome from zero to 7 points score : 0 point ( no affection ) , 7 point ( severe affection )

change from baseline scale at 3 months
Erasmus GBS Outcome Score (EGOS)
Time Frame: change from baseline scale at 3 months
Erasmus GBS Outcome Score (EGOS) is a prognostic model based on age, diarrhea, and GBS disability score at 2 weeks after hospital admission that accurately predicts the chance of being able to walk independently at 3 months
change from baseline scale at 3 months
overall neuropathy limitations scale ONLS .
Time Frame: change from baseline scale at 3 months
it is modified disability sum score : sum of arm grade and leg grade limitation score ; arm grade from zero point ( less limitation ) to 5 points ( most limitation ) and leg grade from zero point ( less limitation) to 7 points (more limitation)
change from baseline scale at 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
comparison between pre and post neurophysiological studies
Time Frame: change from baseline scale at 3 months
neurophysiological study pre- and after 3 months change of degree of affection and improvement in latency in nerve conduction m/ sec. amplitude m/v , velocity of nerve /s conduction and F-wave of both upper limbs and lower limbs
change from baseline scale at 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Guillain-Barre Syndrome

Clinical Trials on plasmapheresis

Subscribe