BREATHE ALD: A Shared Decision-Making Intervention for Adults With Advanced Lung Disease (BREATHE-ALD)

April 4, 2024 updated by: Maureen George, Columbia University

The Development and Pilot Testing of a Brief Shared Decision-Making Intervention to Improve Palliative Care Outcomes for Adults With Advanced Lung Disease

This study aims to:

  1. Develop the BREATHE-ALD intervention for adults with Advanced Lung Disease, multiple chronic conditions, and palliative care needs and their caregivers using interviews with 10 advanced lung disease (ALD) adults and their caregivers
  2. To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of intervention procedures; and
  3. To explore intervention effects on ALD outcomes

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study addresses the important problem of adults with symptomatic advanced lung disease (ALD) who are at high risk for poor outcomes. Palliative care (PCare) improves the quality of life of individuals and their caregivers through the prevention and relief of suffering by identifying, assessing and treating the physical, psychosocial and spiritual problems associated with life-threatening illness. However, pulmonary clinicians rarely refer adults with ALD to PCare because of time demands, a lack of confidence in PCare and the perceived threat PCare poses to the relationship they have established with the ALD adult. Therefore, we are developing BREATHE-ALD (BRief intervention to Enhance Adherence to Treatment and HEalth advice in Advanced Lung Disease [ALD]), a novel shared decision-making (SDM) intervention to improve outcomes for adults with ALD.

The study includes two phases: (1) a development phase to develop BREATHE-ALD using interviews with 10 ALD adults and their caregivers with expert review to adapt BREATHE, and (2) a pilot validation phase conducting a pilot trial in which 10 adults with ALD receive BREATHE-ALD. We will follow adults with ALD for 3 months post-intervention to assess the impact of BREATHE-ALD on self-management and patient outcomes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Recruiting
        • Weill Cornell Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Maureen George, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients and caregivers of patients followed for advanced lung disease at Weill Cornell Medicine. Nurse practitioner who manages ALD patients at Weill Cornell Medicine.

Description

Pre-trial

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient participants with symptomatic advanced lung disease (ALD) followed at Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM).
  • Caregiver participants who care for adults with symptomatic ALD followed at Weill Cornell Medicine.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that have serious mental health conditions that preclude completion of study procedures or confound analyses.
  • Caregivers that have serious mental health conditions that preclude completion of study procedures or confound analyses.

Trial

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient participants with symptomatic advanced lung disease (ALD) followed at Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM).
  • Nurse practitioner must manage a panel of adult ALD patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that have serious mental health conditions that preclude completion of study procedures or confound analyses.
  • Patients anticipated to have less than 3-month survival.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of qualitative interviews completed in the development phase
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Qualitative interviews will be conducted with adults with advanced lung disease and their caregivers to understand their experiences managing ALD using semi-structured in-depth individual interviews. The information collected will aid the design of BREATHE-ALD and the implementation of the pilot phase of this study.
Up to 6 months
Ratio of participants who completed the intervention to the number of participants consented
Time Frame: Up to 3 months post-intervention
To determine the level of retention, the ratio of participants who completed the intervention to the number of participants consented will be measured.
Up to 3 months post-intervention
Mean mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) Dyspnea Scale
Time Frame: Up to 3 months post-intervention
The mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) Dyspnea Scale measures the effect of breathlessness when performing daily activities. The mMRC breathlessness scale comprises five statements that describe almost the entire range of respiratory disability from none (Grade 1) to almost complete incapacity (Grade 5).
Up to 3 months post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months (post-intervention)
The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a disease-specific instrument designed to measure impact on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being in patients with obstructive airways disease. It is a 50-item questionnaire with two parts, in which part one measures frequency and severity of symptoms while part two measures activities that impact breathlessness. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations.
Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months (post-intervention)
Mean PROMIS Pain Intensity - Short Form V10 3a
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months (post-intervention)
PROMIS Pain Intensity instrument measures how much a person hurts. It is a 3-item instrument that evaluates how much pain the patient has felt in the past seven days. Each question about pain intensity is rated on a five-point scale from had no pain (1) to very severe (5).
Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months (post-intervention)
Mean PROMIS Fatigue - Short Form 6a
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months (post-intervention)
PROMIS Fatigue instrument measures how much a person feels tired. It is a 6-10-item questionnaire that evaluates how tired or exhausted the patient has felt in the past seven days. Each question about fatigue is rated on a five-point scale from never (1) to always (5).
Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months (post-intervention)
Mean Short Form 36
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months (post-intervention)
Short Form 36 (SF-36) is a well validated instrument that measures overall health status. It consists of 36 items and has eight sections.; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0-100. Lower scores = more disability and higher scores = less disability
Baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months (post-intervention)
Mean Shared Decision Making Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline (immediately post-intervention)
The Shared Decision Making (SDM) Questionnaire-9, is a patient reported, 9-item validated instrument that consists of nine statements that measure the decisional process in medical visits from both patients' and physicians' perspectives. Each statement is rated on a six-point scale from "completely disagree" to "completely agree".
Baseline (immediately post-intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maureen George, PhD, Columbia University School of Nursing

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Clinical Trials on BRief intervention to Enhance Adherence to Treatment and HEalth advice in Advanced Lung Disease

3
Subscribe