Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

June 16, 2021 updated by: Manar Abd El galil Aneis, Cairo University
The purpose of the study is to determine the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy on functional outcomes, pain, and pain-related anxiety in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Back pain has considerable negative effects on the quality of life of affected individuals. Individuals with new-onset back pain have an increased risk of lower quality of life scores, and the negative effect on quality of life increases with persistent pain. Patients with chronic back pain report a quality of life that is lower than individuals without pain and that is comparable to those of individuals with life-threatening diagnoses. In addition, back pain is associated with worry and fears, particularly about the (sense of) self and socialrelationships and especially when pain persists longer than expected.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dokki, Egypt, 34518
        • Outpatient clinic - Faculty of Physical Therapy - Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Thirty patients with non-specific chronic low back pain from both sexes will be included.
  2. Subjects with normal body mass index (18 to 25).
  3. The age of patients range from 20 to 35 years.
  4. Duration of pain more than 3 months up to 2 years.
  5. Normal cognition score 26 or above according to MoCA Scale.7. Highly educated at least high school.

Exclusion Criteria:

The patients will be excluded if they have any of the followings:

  1. Lumbar canal stenosis.
  2. Lumbar discogenic lesions.
  3. Any inflammatory arthritis, tumors, infection involving the lumbar spine.
  4. Patients with decreased range of motion secondary to congenital anomalies, muscular contracture or bony block.
  5. Previous lumbar surgery or trauma.
  6. Subjects with a history of any neurologic disease.
  7. Cauda equina Syndrome.
  8. Patients suffering from psychological, cognitive or emotional disturbance.
  9. Patients who had previously participated in cognitive behavioral therapy.
  10. Deafness and blindness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive Behavioral therapy
to modify any erroneous beliefs about pain and disability and to promote coping strategies and self-efficacy through a graded activity.

The first 6 sessions: the cognitive part was explained with the support of a PowerPoint presentation using diagrams, images, and texts. The therapist explained the lumbar engine behavior, the neurophysiologic basis of pain, the importance of the participant's involvement in the treatment (e.g., coping and motivation), and the maintenance of good ergonomics which was aimed at modifying the physiologic response to the pain system.

The second 12 sessions: concepts viewed in the first session were revised; as well, the operant and respondent parts were explained.

Each session will include 10 minutes of aerobic activity (walking or stationary bicycle), followed by five types of muscle stretches and eight types of ground exercises aimed at strengthening the lumbar muscles responsible for stabilization.
Active Comparator: Home program exercises
Patients in both groups carried out exercise therapy for six weeks. There will be an educational session for each patient to make sure the exercises will be done successfully and supervision once per week.
Each session will include 10 minutes of aerobic activity (walking or stationary bicycle), followed by five types of muscle stretches and eight types of ground exercises aimed at strengthening the lumbar muscles responsible for stabilization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessing the change in pain intensity
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks post-intervention
Assessment via using visual analogue scale A tool used to help a person rate the intensity of certain sensations and feelings, such as pain. The visual analog scale for pain is a straight line with one
Baseline and 6 weeks post-intervention
Assessing the change in back function
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks post-intervention
Assessment via using Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index It is a 10-item self assessing questionnaire; each item contains 6 levels of answers that can be scored from 0 to 5.
Baseline and 6 weeks post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessing the change in anxiety related to pain
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 weeks post-intervention
Assessment via using pain anxiety symptom scale (PASS) is a 20-item self-report scale that measures components of pain-related anxiety, including cognitive anxiety, escape and avoidance, fearful appraisals of pain, and physiological anxiety.
Baseline and 6 weeks post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Manar Abdelgalil, Abdelgalil, Horus University in Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Manis_MSc

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain, Mechanical

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

3
Subscribe