Clinical Feasibility of Speech Phenotyping for Remote Assessment of Neurodegenerative and Psychiatric Disorders (RHAPSODY)

March 21, 2023 updated by: Novoic Limited

A Study to Investigate the Feasibility of Administration of a Speech Battery and the Use of Speech-based Biomarkers for the Clinical Assessment of Common Neurodegenerative and Psychiatric Disorders in a Remote Setting.

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the feasibility of eliciting continuous narrative speech in different neurodegenerative and psychiatric indications, using remote, self-administered speech tasks, as measured by the average length of speech elicitation for each speech task during the first week of self-assessment. Secondary objectives include (1) evaluating the reliability of speech tasks in the remote self-administered setting, as measured by the intra- and inter-subject variance; (2) accessing the adherence of speech tasks in this setting, as measured by the subject average fraction of days during the first week, where at least one task response is submitted; (3) evaluating the feasibility of using speech tasks in the setting of a telemedicine videoconference, as measured by the average length of speech elicited in each group; (4) evaluate whether a set of acoustic and linguistic patterns can detect each indication, compare to either a control group or all other indications, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and Cohen's kappa of the relevant binary classifier; (5) evaluating how the performance of such algorithms can be impacted by speaker and environment covariates, as measured by the Kendall rank correlation coefficient of the AUC of each classifier and each of age group, gender and speech-to-reverberation modulation energy ratio.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

172

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Greater London
      • London, Greater London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RS
        • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
      • London, Greater London, United Kingdom, SE5 8AZ
        • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Study population is UK-based.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing to participate, having been provided full information about the study components and details.
  • Native language is English.
  • Has the capacity to provide fully informed consent.
  • Has access to and able to use, or has a caregiver who has access to and able to use a smartphone device running an operation system of iOS 11.0 or later, or Android 7.0 or later.
  • Able to use, or has a caregiver who is able to use a personal computer, notebook or tablet.
  • Has access to a personal computer, notebook or tablet that is (1) Running an operating system of:

macOS X with macOS 10.9 or later; OR Windows 7 or above; AND (2) Capable of audio recording; AND (3) Able to connect to the internet; AND (4) Have access to one of following internet browser software: Internet Explorer version 11 or above; OR Microsoft Edge version 12 or above; OR Firefox version 27 or above; OR Google Chrome version 30 or above; OR Safari version 7 or above.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of alcohol or drug use disorder;
  • History or presence of stroke within the past 2 years;
  • Documented history of transient ischemic attack or unexplained loss of consciousness within the last 12 months.
  • At risk of suicide: score of 10 or above on the PHQ scale, and 10 or above on the MINI suicide questionnaire

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Group 1: Cognitive Disorders

Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Meet National Institute of Aging - Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) core clinical criteria (2011) for MCI due to Alzheimer's or Mild Alzheimer's Dementia

Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) Diagnosis of possible or probable DLB based on the criteria defined by The Dementia with Lewy Bodies Consortium (2015)

Non-AD non-DLB MCI Diagnosis of 'probable' and 'possible' behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) according to the International Behavioral Variant FTD Criteria Consortium OR semantic variant or nonfluent-agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (PPA) FTD according to Mesulam's criteria OR Vascular Dementia according to NINDS-AIREN International Workshop

AND

Date of diagnosis not more than five years prior to consent Subjects must have MMSE scores of 23-30 (inclusive); or TICS40 score of 20-40 (inclusive) based on a test not older than 1 month at the time of consent.

Age of 50-85 years (inclusive)

Group 2: Motor disorders

Parkinson's Disease (PD)

  • Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's Disease based on the UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank Clinical Diagnostic Criteria
  • Date of diagnosis not more than five years prior to consent
  • Hoehn and Yahr stage 2 or less
  • Age of 30-85 years (inclusive)

Motor neuron Disease (MND)

  • Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis based on gold-standard clinical criteria
  • Stage 3 or less on the King's ALS Staging system
  • Age of 18-85 years (inclusive)
Group 3: Affective disorders

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

  • Meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria for a current major depressive episode (MDE) as assessed by the MINI
  • Current episode of at least moderate severity as assessed by the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale.
  • Date of diagnosis (using MINI assessment) and severity (CGI) maximum of two months prior to consent.
  • Age of 18-85 years (inclusive).

Bipolar Disorder (BD)

  • Meet DSM-5 criteria for BD as assessed by the MINI (type 1 or type 2)
  • Current depressive episode as assessed by the MINI
  • Current episode of at least moderate severity as assessed by the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale.
  • Date of diagnosis (using MINI assessment) and severity (CGI) maximum of two months prior to consent.

Age of 18-85 years (inclusive).

Group 4: Unaffected Controls

Group 4 specific recruitment criteria matched for the 'Group 1: Cognitive Disorders' cohort:

  • Age of 50-85 years (inclusive)
  • Approximately age, gender and education matched to AD subjects on a group level.
  • In otherwise good health condition.

Group 4 specific recruitment criteria matched for the 'Group 2: Motor Disorders' cohort:

  • Age of 30-85 years (inclusive)
  • Approximately age, gender and education matched to PD subjects on a group level.
  • In otherwise good health condition.

Group 4 specific recruitment criteria matched for the 'Group 3: Affective Disorders' cohort:

  • Age of 30-85 years (inclusive).
  • Approximately age, gender and education matched to MDD/BD subjects on a group level.
  • In otherwise good health condition.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The average length of speech elicitation for each speech task (in seconds) during the first week of self-assessments.
Time Frame: One week
One week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The intra-subject variance of length of speech elicitation for each speech task during the first week of self-assessments, as measured by Coefficients of Individual Agreement (CIA).
Time Frame: One week
One week
The inter-subject variance of length of speech elicitation for each speech task during the first week of self-assessments, as measured by Coefficients of Individual Agreement (CIA).
Time Frame: One week
One week
The subject average fraction of days during the first week of remote, self-assessment, where participants submitted at least one task response.
Time Frame: One week
One week
The average length of speech elicitation for each speech task, during the telemedicine video conference.
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between the AD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between the Dementia with Lewy Bodies (LBD) diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between the PD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between the MND diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between the Frontotemporal Dementia and Vascular Dementia (FTD/VCI) diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between the MDD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between the BD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the AD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the LBD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the PD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the MND diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the FTD/VCI diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the MDD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the BD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the AD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the LBD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the PD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the MND diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the FTD/VCI diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the MDD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the BD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between the AD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between the LBD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between the PD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between the FTD/VCI diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between the MDD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between the BD diagnostic groups vs the applicable control group.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The AUC of the binary classifier distinguishing between the following diagnostic groups vs all other diagnostic groups (pooled): AD, LBD, PD, MND, FTD/VCI, MDD, BD.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The sensitivity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the following diagnostic groups vs the other groups (pooled): AD, LBD, PD, MND, FTD/VCI, MDD, BD.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The specificity of the binary classifier distinguishing between the following diagnostic groups vs the other groups (pooled): AD, LBD, PD, MND, FTD/VCI, MDD, BD.
Time Frame: One month
One month
The Cohen's kappa of the binary classifier distinguishing between the following diagnostic groups vs the other groups (pooled): AD, LBD, PD, MND, FTD/VCI, MDD, BD.
Time Frame: One month
One month
For each classifier/regressor in the outcomes, the correlation between the AUC/CIA and each age group, gender and speech-to-reverberation modulation energy ratio group, as measured by the Kendall rank correlation coefficient.
Time Frame: One month
One month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Allan Young, Professor, King's College London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Subscribe