Decision Aid for the Improvement of Decision-Making in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

September 3, 2025 updated by: Donald R Sullivan, MD, MA, MCR, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Improving Decision-Making Encounters in Lung Cancer (I DECide): A Low-Literacy Conversation Tool

This clinical trial refines and tests the effect of a decision aid in improving decision-making in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Patients with cancer want to be informed about their diagnoses, treatment procedures and goals of treatment. They also seek active roles in decision-making. Shared decision-making (SDM) is the process of clinician and patient jointly participating in a health decision after discussing the options, benefits and harms, and considering the patient's values, preferences, and circumstances. SDM can improve patient involvement in decision making, satisfaction, health care quality, and quality of life. Decision aids can improve patient knowledge, create more realistic outcome expectations; reduce decisional conflict, distress, depression and uncertainty; and improve physician-patient communication and quality of life, compared with no decision aid. This trial's main aim is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a decision aid in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Refine a conversation tool among patients with lung cancer by conducting prototype testing in an iterative process.

II. Conduct a trial at two comprehensive cancer treatment centers representing academic and Veterans Affairs medical centers.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients receive the conversation tool.

ARM II: Patients receive usual care.

Patients in both arms are followed up within 4-8 weeks after baseline to complete a second questionnaire.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

98

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • OHSU Knight Cancer Institute
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Portland VA Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PART I: Completed treatment for suspected or confirmed stage I-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • PART I: English fluency
  • PART II: Undergoing diagnostic work-up for suspected stage I-IV NSCLC
  • PART II: English fluency
  • PART II: > 6-month life expectancy
  • PART II: Score of > 3 on the 6-Item Screener for Cognitive Impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (conversation tool)
Patients receive the conversation tool.
Receive conversation tool
Ancillary studies - Baseline and follow-up questionnaires
Active Comparator: Arm II (usual care)
Patients receive usual care.
Ancillary studies - Baseline and follow-up questionnaires
Receive usual/standard of care
Other Names:
  • standard of care
  • standard therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of the conversation tool
Time Frame: At enrollment
The number of patients enrolled divided by the number of patients offered enrollment.
At enrollment
Acceptability of the conversation tool
Time Frame: At enrollment
The number of participants who completed the conversation tool divided by the number of participants who began the conversation tool.
At enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Decisional conflict
Time Frame: At the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale.
At the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Decisional Regret
Time Frame: At the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Assessed using the Decisional Regret Scale.
At the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Perceived involvement in care
Time Frame: At the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Assessed using the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale.
At the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Shared decision-making quality
Time Frame: At the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Assessed using the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire.
At the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Decision making involvement
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Assessed using the Control Preferences Scale.
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Assessed using the Decision Self-Efficacy Scale.
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Values-treatment concordance
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 8 weeks
Assessed using electronic medical record (EMR).
From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Donald Sullivan, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 7, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Informational Intervention

Subscribe