A Study To Assess the Safety and Effects of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) Intramuscular Injection in Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Platysma Prominence

October 28, 2024 updated by: AbbVie

A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BOTOX® (Botulinum Toxin Type A) Purified Neurotoxin Complex for the Treatment of Platysma Prominence

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and effects of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) for the temporary improvement in the appearance of platysma prominence.

Study doctors will randomize participants into 1 of the 2 groups, called treatment arms. There is a 1 in 2 chance that a participant will be assigned to placebo. Around 400 participants will be enrolled in the study in the United States and Canada.

Participants will receive a single treatment of intramuscular injection of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) or placebo on Day 1 during this 4 month long study.

Participants will attend regular monthly visits during the study at the study site.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

408

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 4E1
        • Humphrey Cosmetic Dermatology /ID# 229522
    • Ontario
      • Burlington, Ontario, Canada, L7N 3N2
        • Dermetics Cosmetic Dermatology /ID# 229482
      • Cobourg, Ontario, Canada, K9A 0Z4
        • Dr Melinda Gooderham Medicine Profession /ID# 229456
      • Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada, L4B 1A5
        • The Center For Dermatology /ID# 229481
    • Arizona
      • Glendale, Arizona, United States, 85308
        • Advanced Research Associates - Glendale /ID# 229256
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85255-4134
        • Clear Dermatology & Aesthetics Center /ID# 229252
    • California
      • Encino, California, United States, 91436-2124
        • Clinical Testing of Beverly Hills /ID# 229946
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90045
        • Dermatology Research Associates /ID# 229949
      • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92663
        • Steve Yoelin MD Medical Associate Inc /ID# 229420
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92121-2119
        • Cosmetic Laser Dermatology /ID# 229245
      • Santa Monica, California, United States, 90404-2208
        • Ava T. Shamban MD - Santa Monica. /ID# 229421
      • Solana Beach, California, United States, 92075-2228
        • Art of Skin MD /ID# 229255
    • Connecticut
      • Westport, Connecticut, United States, 06880
        • DMR Research PLLC /ID# 229938
    • Florida
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34209-5642
        • Susan H. Weinkle MD /ID# 229419
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33401-2712
        • Research Institute of the Southeast, LLC /ID# 229234
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260-2386
        • Laser and Skin Surgery Center of Indiana /ID# 229515
    • Louisiana
      • Metairie, Louisiana, United States, 70006
        • Coleman Center For Cosmetic Dermatologic Surgery /ID# 229414
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70115
        • Delricht Research /ID# 229248
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21208-6391
        • Aesthetic Center at Woodholme /ID# 229836
      • Hunt Valley, Maryland, United States, 21030-3216
        • Maryland Dermatology Laser, Skin, & Vein Institute /ID# 229260
    • New Jersey
      • Montclair, New Jersey, United States, 07042
        • Image Dermatology, P.C. /ID# 229244
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016-4974
        • Laser & Skin Surgery Center of New York /ID# 229423
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27517-9901
        • Aesthetic Solutions /ID# 229241
      • Wilmington, North Carolina, United States, 28403
        • Wilmington Dermatology Center /ID# 229246
    • Ohio
      • Dublin, Ohio, United States, 43016
        • Aventiv Research Dublin /ID# 229254
    • Pennsylvania
      • Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, United States, 19073-2228
        • KGL Skin Study Center, LLC /ID# 229253
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37203-1513
        • Nashville Center for Laser and Facial Surgery /ID# 229237
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • Dallas Plastic Surgery Institute /ID# 229258
    • Virginia
      • Arlington, Virginia, United States, 22209
        • SkinDC /ID# 229251
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99202
        • Premier Clinical Research /ID# 229261

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must voluntarily sign and date an informed consent, approved by an independent ethics committee (IEC)/institutional review board (IRB), prior to the initiation of any screening or study specific procedures
  • Are willing and able to comply with procedures required in the protocol
  • Adult male or female, at least 18 years old at the time of signing the informed consent
  • Good health as determined by medical history, physical examination, vital signs, and investigator's judgment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any medical condition that may put the participant at increased medical risk with exposure to BOTOX, including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other condition that might interfere with neuromuscular function
  • Participant has an anticipated need for treatment with botulinum toxin of any serotype for any indication during the study (other than study intervention)
  • Anticipated need for surgery or overnight hospitalization during the study
  • Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding and are considering becoming pregnant or donating eggs during the study
  • Known immunization or hypersensitivity to any botulinum toxin serotype
  • History of clinically significant (per investigator's judgment) drug or alcohol abuse within the last 6 months
  • Lower facial and neck hair, scarring (e.g., acne), or other abnormal variations that may interfere with photography (such that photograph is not acceptable)
  • Tattoos, jewelry, or clothing that cannot be removed, and that obscure the target area of interest

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo will be injected into the platysma muscle on Day 1
Saline Injection
Experimental: BOTOX
BOTOX (OnabotulinumtoxinA) was injected into the platysma muscle on Day 1
Injection
Other Names:
  • BOTOX

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite Achievement of Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS and Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS, at Maximum Contraction at Day 14
Time Frame: Day 14

The Clinician Allergan Platysma Prominence Scale (C-APPS) evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.

The Participant Allergan Platysma Prominence Scale (P-APPS) evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

Day 14
Achievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 14
Time Frame: Day 14
The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.
Day 14
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Enrollment to Day 120
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a casual relationship with this treatment.
Enrollment to Day 120
Achievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Participant's Self- Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 14
Time Frame: Day 14
The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.
Day 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
Time Frame: Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.
Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
Percentage of Participants With Responses of "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 14
Time Frame: Day 14
The ANLFQ: Satisfaction scale assesses how satisfied the participants are with the treatment they received for the appearance of their neck and lower face. Item 5 is a verbal descriptor scale ranging from 1 (Very satisfied) to 5 (Very dissatisfied).
Day 14
Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the Bother Assessment Scale - Platysma Prominence (BAS-PP) Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 14
Time Frame: Day 14
The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).
Day 14
Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 14
Time Frame: Day 14
The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).
Day 14
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
Time Frame: Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.
Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Rating of Minimal or Mild According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14
Time Frame: Day 14
The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.
Day 14
Percentage of Participants With Responses of "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" on the ANLFQ: Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 14
Time Frame: Day 14
The ANLFQ: Satisfaction scale assesses how satisfied the participants are with the treatment they received for the appearance of their neck and lower face. Item 5 is a verbal descriptor scale ranging from 1 (Very satisfied) to 5 (Very dissatisfied).
Day 14
Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 14
Time Frame: Day 14
The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).
Day 14
Change From Baseline on the ANLFQ: Impacts Summary Score at Days 30, 60, and 90
Time Frame: Days 30, 60, and 90
The ANLFQ: Impacts scale assesses the psychosocial impact of the appearance of the neck and lower face. All items are rated on a 5-point Verbal Descriptor Scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (All of the time), with higher scores indicating greater negative impact from the appearance of the neck and lower face.
Days 30, 60, and 90
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
Time Frame: Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.
Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
Change From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14
Time Frame: Day 14
The ANLFQ: Impacts scale assesses the psychosocial impact of the appearance of the neck and lower face. All items are rated on a 5-point Verbal Descriptor Scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (All of the time), with higher summary scores (range: 7-35) indicating greater negative psychosocial impact from the appearance of the neck and lower face. For change from baseline in the ANLFQ: Impacts summary score, positive values indicate worsening and negative values indicate improvement in the psychosocial impact.
Day 14
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
Time Frame: Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.
Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: ABBVIE INC., AbbVie

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols, analyses plans, clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

For details on when studies are available for sharing visit https://vivli.org/ourmember/abbvie/

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to this clinical trial data can be requested by any qualified researchers who engage in rigorous independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and statistical analysis plan and execution of a data sharing statement. Data requests can be submitted at any time after approval in the US and/or EU and a primary manuscript is accepted for publication. For more information on the process, or to submit a request, visit the following link https://www.abbvieclinicaltrials.com/hcp/data-sharing/

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe