Culturally-Targeted COVID-19 Communication and SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing Evaluation and Uptake

June 3, 2024 updated by: Todd Lucas, Michigan State University

Culturally-targeted Communication to Promote SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing in Saliva: Enabling Evaluation of Inflammatory Pathways in COVID-19 Racial Disparities

This disparities-focused study seeks to evaluate communication strategies for better encouraging understanding and uptake of salivary SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing among African Americans residing in Flint, Michigan. This iteration will consider individuals recruited from the Flint Registry and assess willingness to participate in a drive-up saliva sample collection taking place at a central location in Flint, Michigan.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

African Americans develop and die from SARS-CoV-2 infection more than any other racial group in the United States, including in majority African American cities such as Flint, Michigan. Addressing these disparities may be aided by SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing. However, African Americans may be reluctant to partake in conventional antibody testing programs due to medical mistrust and experiences with racism. This study seeks to evaluate communication strategies for better encouraging understanding and uptake of salivary SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing. The central hypothesis is that African-Americans will be more receptive to antibody testing when benefits and limitations are communicated in a culturally effective manner. Our clinical trial aims are to 1) develop and compare effects of a general versus culturally-targeted video about antibody testing on African American and White Flint residents' antibody testing attitudes and uptake; 2) identify and compare effects of a general versus culturally-targeted video on activation of medical mistrust and racism-related cognition among African Americans when considering antibody testing. In collaboration with clinical and community partners, we have prepared and will evaluate general and culturally-targeted video tutorials about SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing. These brief videos will be distributed to the Flint community through the Flint Registry - a highly visible local health resource exchange. We will furnish an opportunity to engage salivary antibody screening and measure willingness to participate. In this study iteration, we will consider willingness to participate in a drive-up saliva sample collection that is taking place at a central location in Flint, Michigan.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

666

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Flint, Michigan, United States, 48502
        • Flint Journal Building

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • African American or White, 18 or older, and enrolled in the Flint Registry

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All who do not meet inclusion criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: White Flint Registry: General
White participants receive "general consumption" video information about SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing.
SARS-CoV-2 video tutorial is for general consumption and does not include culturally targeted information
Active Comparator: African American Registry: General
African American participants receive "general consumption" video information about SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing.
SARS-CoV-2 video tutorial is for general consumption and does not include culturally targeted information
Experimental: African American Registry: Culturally Targeted
African American participants receive culturally targeted video information about SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing.
SARS-CoV-2 video tutorial includes a one minute video based messaging adjunct meant to enact a culturally targeted framing of health information presented to African Americans.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number (Percentage) of Participants Requested to Participate in Saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing
Time Frame: Immediately following didactic study portion and health communication randomization on day 1.
Number (Percentage) of participants who respond "yes" to be included in offer to participate in no cost SAR-CoV-2 salivary antibody test.
Immediately following didactic study portion and health communication randomization on day 1.
Number (Percentage) of Participants Who Requested Saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing Participated in the Testing.
Time Frame: 8 weeks from the day of consenting to participate in the salivary-based SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing
Number (Percentage) of participants that requested to participate in antibody testing who actually complete antibody testing.
8 weeks from the day of consenting to participate in the salivary-based SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing
SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing Attitudes
Time Frame: Immediately following didactic study portion and health communication randomization on day 1.
Submeasure of Theory of Planned Behavior Indicating extent of a favorable attitude SARS-CoV-2 towards antibody testing (Seven point Likert Rating, with higher scores indicating more favorable Attitudes).
Immediately following didactic study portion and health communication randomization on day 1.
SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing Normative Beliefs
Time Frame: Immediately following didactic study portion and health communication randomization on day 1.
Sub-measure of Theory of Planned Behavior Indicating extent to which believes other people are favorable towards SARS-CoV-2 towards antibody testing (Seven point Likert Rating, with higher scores indicating stronger Normative Beliefs).
Immediately following didactic study portion and health communication randomization on day 1.
Antibody Testing Perceived Behavioral Control
Time Frame: Immediately following didactic study portion and health communication randomization on day 1.
Sub-measure of Theory of Planned Behavior Indicating Self Efficacy to Complete Antibody Testing (Seven point Likert Rating, with higher scores indicating greater Perceived Behavioral Control).
Immediately following didactic study portion and health communication randomization on day 1.
Antibody Testing Intentions
Time Frame: Immediately following didactic study portion and health communication randomization on day 1.
Sub-measure of Theory of Planned Behavior indicating Intentions to Complete Antibody Testing (Seven point Likert Rating, with higher scores indicating stronger screening Intentions).
Immediately following didactic study portion and health communication randomization on day 1.
Antibody Testing Anticipatory Racism
Time Frame: Immediately following didactic study portion and health communication randomization on day 1.
Extent to which participants believe that racism-related factors would diminish the value of SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing for self (Seven-point Likert rating, with higher scores indicating greater Anticipatory Racism).
Immediately following didactic study portion and health communication randomization on day 1.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 19, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 19, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be made available per requirements and sharing structures established by NCI "SeroNet" initiative.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Upon Study Completion

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SARS-CoV2 Infection

Clinical Trials on General SARS-CoV-2 Communication

Subscribe