Effects of High Intensity Laser on Mechanical and Physiological Findings in Pregnant Women With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

September 7, 2021 updated by: Mohamed Magdy Ali Hassan ElMeligie, October 6 University

Effects of High Intensity Laser on Mechanical and Physiological Findings in Pregnant Women With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study will propose a novel approach to treat pregnant women with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) using the recently introduced High intensity laser therapy with its deep penetration and high-power characteristics. It's hopeful that the results of this study can fill the gap of knowledge surrounding the conservative treatment options for CTS in order to help patients restore their nerve function properly and promote new ways of addressing CTS.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Giza
      • Al Ḩayy Ath Thāmin, Giza, Egypt, 12511
        • October 6 University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

(1) Pregnant women with mild to moderate CTS diagnosed by a physician according to the American Association of Electrodiagnostic recent guidelines [18] (2) The age ranged between 20 to 40 years (3) Had positive clinical provocative tests for the CTS (Tinel test and Phalen test) and (5) Had a history of pain, paresthesia or numbness in the median nerve distribution, nocturnal pain, and night waking

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients were excluded from the study if they had cervical disc prolapse, cervical spondylosis, thoracic outlet syndrome, diabetes, gestational diabetes, cardiovascular disorders and hypertension. Patients who had carpal tunnel release surgery and patients who were diagnosed with CTS before pregnancy were also excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A (High Intensity Laser therapy + Conventional Physical Therapy)
Patients in group (A) received conventional physical therapy program along with HILT. Patients received pulsed Nd: YAG laser treatment, produced by EXAND MY 1064 nm Laser system, Mectronic Medicale, Italy. The apparatus provided pulsed emission (1064 nm), very high peak power (3 kW), a high level of fluency (energy density; 360-1780 mJ/cm2).
Fifteen treatment sessions with pulsed Nd: YAG laser were applied to the subjects of the study group, three sessions per week, over 5 weeks in succession via EXAND MY 1064 nm Laser system, Mectronic Medicale, Italy. Patients in group (A) received HILT along with the conventional physical therapy program. The session involved 3 subphases: (1) The Initial phase "Analgesic phase", (2) In the intermediate phase "Trigger point phase"and (3)The final phase "Bio-stimulation phase" was applied for 6 minutes with a slow scanning in several parallel longitudinal lines.
Other Names:
  • High power laser therapy
Fifteen treatment sessions that involved using a neutral custom volar splint alongside neural and tendon gliding exercises. the splint was used at night and while performing strenuous activities during the day for 5 weeks. While nerve and tendon gliding exercises was repeated 10 times at each session and patients were encouraged to apply exercise 3-5 times per day for 5 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Standard Physiotherapy
Active Comparator: Group B (Conventional Physical Therapy)
Patients in this group received the conventional physical therapy program in the form of splinting, tendon and neural gliding exercises. Patients were instructed to wear a neutral custom volar splint at night and while performing strenuous activities during the day for 5 weeks.Also, the patients performed nerve-and tendon-gliding exercise under direct supervision of the therapist during the treatment sessions. Each exercise was repeated 10 times at each session and patients were encouraged to apply exercise 3-5 times per day for 5 weeks.
Fifteen treatment sessions that involved using a neutral custom volar splint alongside neural and tendon gliding exercises. the splint was used at night and while performing strenuous activities during the day for 5 weeks. While nerve and tendon gliding exercises was repeated 10 times at each session and patients were encouraged to apply exercise 3-5 times per day for 5 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Standard Physiotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Distal latency of median nerve sensory distal latency
Time Frame: Baseline and after 5 Weeks
The Median sensory nerve (SNDL) distal latency was measured according to the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AAEM) guidelines with a Neuropack S1 MEB-9004 Nihon Koden (Japan). All measurements were performed in a room with the temperature kept at 25C.
Baseline and after 5 Weeks
Changes in Distal latency of median nerve motor distal latency
Time Frame: Baseline and after 5 Weeks
The Median motor nerve (MNDL) distal latency was measured according to the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine (AAEM) guidelines with a Neuropack S1 MEB-9004 Nihon Koden (Japan). All measurements were performed in a room with the temperature kept at 25C.
Baseline and after 5 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in hand grip strength
Time Frame: Baseline and after 5 Weeks
The hand grip strength (measured in Kilograms) was evaluated by the same investigator. Grip strength was tested by using Jamar hand held dynamometer following the American Society of Hand Therapists guidelines. The patient's arm was positioned with the shoulder adducted and neutrally rotated, the elbow was flexed at 90, the forearm and wrist were neutrally positioned while the participant was sitting. Patients were instructed to squeeze the handle as hard as they could, do maximal grip contraction for 2-5 s.
Baseline and after 5 Weeks
Changes in numeric pain rating scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: Baseline and after 5 Weeks
An 11-point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = maximum pain) was used to assess the patients' levels of hand pain pre and post treatment.
Baseline and after 5 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Abeer F Hanafy, Ph.D, Cairo University
  • Study Director: Radwa M Yehia, Ph.D, Faculty of Physical Therapy, October 6 University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

all of the individual participant data collected during the trial and after deidentification

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 Months after study publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Email: mohamed.magdy.pt@o6u.edu.eg

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on High intensity laser therapy

Subscribe