Rhythmic Reading Training: Comparing the Rhythmic and Visual Contributions to Reading Improvement

July 30, 2021 updated by: Alice Cancer, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Rhythmic Reading Training (RRT): Comparing the Rhythmic and Visual Contributions to Reading Improvement in Developmental Dyslexia

The main objective of the study is to evaluate the specific effect of the sub-components of the reading training program Rhythmic Reading Training (RRT) on reading speed and accuracy in a sample of Italian students with developmental dyslexia (DD). More precisely, in order to better understand the neuropsychological mechanisms involved in reading improvements following RRT, the specific contribution of the visual component of the training (presence of a visual cue) will be investigated in a study with between-groups design.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy, 20123
        • Recruiting
        • Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • having been diagnosed with DD (ICD-10 code: F81.0) on the basis of standard inclusion and exclusion criteria (ICD-10: World Health Organization, 1992) and of the diagnosis procedure followed in the Italian practice

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of comorbidity with other neuropsychiatric or psychopathological conditions
  • having been involved in previous reading intervention programs in the previous 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No intervention
5 weeks no intervention period
Experimental: RRT rhythm only
10 RRT rhythm only sessions of 60 minutes, twice a week under the supervision of a trainer
RRT is a child-friendly computerized reading training program designed for Italian students with DD aged 8-14 yrs. The main feature of this intervention is the integration of a traditional remediation approach (sublexical treatment) with rhythm processing. Therefore, all reading exercises are characterized by a rhythmic accompaniment with gradually increasing speed. In this condition, the RRT activities comprise only a rhythm accompaniment and no visual cue.
Experimental: RRT rhythm + visual cue
10 RRT rhythm + visual cue sessions of 60 minutes, twice a week under the supervision of a trainer
RRT is a child-friendly computerized reading training program designed for Italian students with DD aged 8-14 yrs. The main feature of this intervention is the integration of a traditional remediation approach (sublexical treatment) with rhythm processing. Therefore, all reading exercises are characterized by a rhythmic accompaniment with gradually increasing speed. In this condition, the rhythmic accompaniment is synchronize with a visual cue (the verbal stimuli are highlighted using a red font in synchrony with the rhythm).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Word reading speed - DDE-2
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Word reading speed in syllable / second
5 weeks
Word reading accuracy - DDE-2
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Word reading accuracy in n. of errors
5 weeks
Word reading speed - DDE-2
Time Frame: 3 months
Word reading speed in syllable / second
3 months
Word reading accuracy - DDE-2
Time Frame: 3 months
Word reading accuracy in n. of errors
3 months
Pseudo-word reading speed - DDE-2
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Pseudo-word reading speed in syllable / second
5 weeks
Pseudo-word reading accuracy - DDE-2
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Pseudo-word reading accuracy in n. of errors
5 weeks
Pseudo-word reading speed - DDE-2
Time Frame: 3 months
Pseudo-word reading speed in syllable / second
3 months
Pseudo-word reading accuracy - DDE-2
Time Frame: 3 months
Pseudo-word reading accuracy in n. of errors
3 months
Text reading speed - MT-3-Clinica Battery
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Text reading speed in syllable / second
5 weeks
Text reading accuracy - MT-3-Clinica Battery
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Text reading accuracy in n. of errors
5 weeks
Text reading speed - MT-3-Clinica Battery
Time Frame: 3 months
Text reading speed in syllable / second
3 months
Text reading accuracy - MT-3-Clinica Battery
Time Frame: 3 months
Text reading accuracy in n. of errors
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Digit span (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-IV, WISC-IV)
Time Frame: 5 weeks
Forward and backward digit span
5 weeks
Digit span (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-IV, WISC-IV)
Time Frame: 3 months
Forward and backward digit span
3 months
Phonemic awareness task (Judica et al., in press)
Time Frame: 5 weeks
N. of errors in phonemic blending + n. of errors in phonemic elision
5 weeks
Phonemic awareness task (Judica et al., in press)
Time Frame: 3 months
N. of errors in phonemic blending + n. of errors in phonemic elision
3 months
Rapid Automatized naming task - RAN (De Luca et al., 2005)
Time Frame: 5 weeks
RAN speed in seconds
5 weeks
Rapid Automatized naming task - RAN (De Luca et al., 2005)
Time Frame: 3 months
RAN speed in seconds
3 months
Selective Auditory attention task - NEPSY-II
Time Frame: 5 weeks
N. of errors
5 weeks
Selective Auditory attention task - NEPSY-II
Time Frame: 3 months
N. of errors
3 months
Rhythm reproduction task
Time Frame: 5 weeks
n. of correctly reproduced rhythmic patterns
5 weeks
Rhythm reproduction task
Time Frame: 3 months
n. of correctly reproduced rhythmic patterns
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 9, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 27, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Developmental Dyslexia

Clinical Trials on RRT rhythm only

Subscribe