Goal Directed Fluid Therapy Versus Liberal Fluid Regimen in Primary Elective Hip Artrhoplasty

May 30, 2023 updated by: Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Goal Directed Fluid Management vs Liberal Fluid Regimen Based on Mean Arterial Pressure in Patients Undergoing Spinal Anesthesia for Primary Elective Hip Arthroplasty: a Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Study."

Patients undergoing elective primary total hip replacement and spinal anesthesia may encounter significant hemodynamic instability.

The study is a randomized controlled type and is aimed at comparing how perioperatory hypotension and fluid regimen are managed using Clearsight non invasive monitoring system or PAM monitoring.

The primary endpoint is to evaluate total duration of hypotension, defined as a MAP < 65 mmHg, calculated during all the perioperatory time.

Fifty-eight patients, aged 50-80 years, with an American Society of Anaesthesiologists' (ASA) score I, II and III were enrolled and split in two groups (Clearsight and control group). Patients were monitored both with the EV1000 platform, the Clearsight finger-cuff and MAP monitoring. Depending on the group, the fluid regimen was a goal directed fluid therapy or a liberal fluid regimen.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Bologna, Italy
        • IORizzoli

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 50-80 years
  • ASA I, II or III
  • primary elective hip arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • spinal anesthesia contraindications
  • periferical vasculopaty
  • other diseases which indicates better an invasive monitoring by radial artery cannulation
  • atrial fibrillation
  • denial or inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Clearsight
hemodynamic monitoring and goal directed fluid therapy guided by clearsight
Device: Clearsight non invasive hemodynamic monitoring
Goal directed fluid therapy fuided by Clearsight monitoring
Other: Control
hemodynamic monitoring blinded and silenced, no goal directed fluid therapy. Fluid therapy based on clinical evaluation and mean arterial pressure by non-invasive monitoring
Device: Clearsight non invasive hemodynamic monitoring
Goal directed fluid therapy fuided by Clearsight monitoring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
total perioperative hypotension time defined by a mean arterial pressure < 65mmHg, from arrival in the anesthesia induction room to resolution of spinal block in Recovery Room (i.e. up to 8 hours)
Time Frame: from arrival in the anesthesia induction room to resolution of spinal block in Recovery Room
from arrival in the anesthesia induction room to resolution of spinal block in Recovery Room

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Stefano Bonarelli, MD, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 22, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 22, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 22, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Emospin 2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemodynamic Monitoring

Clinical Trials on Clearsight non invasive hemodynamic monitoring

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Thailand

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe