The Efficacy of Prophylactic TAF for HBsAg-positive Patients Receiving bDMARDs

August 5, 2021 updated by: Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

The Efficacy of TAF as a Prophylactic Antiviral Agent for HBsAg-positive Patients Receiving Biological DMARDs (bDMARDs)

Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) is an emerging issue and a potentially life-threatening complication to patients with history of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection whose immune system is deficient or suppressed. It is estimated that the risk of HBVr ranges 20%-50% in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Not only HBsAg-positive patients but also HBsAg-negative/antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc)-positive patients (resolved hepatitis B) have the risk of HBVr.

Recent studies also reported that the risk of HBVr associated with TNF-α inhibitor treatment widely ranged from 12.3% to 62.5%. Antiviral prophylaxis by nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) is recommended for patients with high risk of HBVr according to 2018 AASLD guidance. Phase 3 studies reported that tenofovir alafenamide (Vemlidy, TAF) can effectively suppress HBV in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients, and TAF is superior to TDF in safety profiles and ALT normalization. However, the evidence of TAF in prevention HBV reactivation for patients with HBsAg-positive and imflammatory arthritis, who need bDMARDs are still missing.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the major cause of chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. There are up to 248 million people worldwide chronically infected with HBV. HBV reactivation (HBVr) is an emerging issue and a potentially life-threatening complication to patients with history of HBV infection whose immune system is deficient or suppressed. It is estimated that the risk of HBVr ranges 20%-50% in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients undergoing chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy. Not only HBsAg-positive patients but also HBsAg-negative/antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc)-positive patients (resolved hepatitis B) have the risk of HBVr. The investigator's studies have demonstrated that the risk of HBsAg seroreversion was 10% in diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients undergoing anti-CD20 (rituximab) treatment; and the risk of HBsAg reverse seroconversion in rheumatic arthritis (RA) patients with resolved HBV infection and received biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or glucocorticoid (GC) treatment can persist for up to 10 years. In the investigator's previous study, it also be investigated the risk of HBVr under different immunosuppressant regimens in HBsAg-positive patients with RA, and the investigator pointed out immunosuppressive treatment with a combination of GC, synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sDMARDs), and bDMARDs has the highest risk of HBVr with annual incidence around 20%. Recent studies also reported that the risk of HBVr associated with TNF-α inhibitor treatment widely ranged from 12.3% to 62.5%.

Antiviral prophylaxis by nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) is recommended for patients with high risk of HBVr according to 2018 AASLD guidance. Phase 3 studies reported that tenofovir alafenamide (Vemlidy, TAF) can effectively suppress HBV in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients, and TAF is superior to TDF in safety profiles and ALT normalization. However, the evidence of TAF in prevention HBV reactivation for patients with HBsAg-positive and imflammatory arthritis, who need bDMARDs are still missing. Therefore, the investigator plans to conduct this randomized controlled trial to confirm the efficacy of TAF as a prophylactic antiviral agent for HBsAg-positive patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) on bDMARDs treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

108

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >=20 years old;
  • History of chronic hepatitis B with HBsAg-positive;
  • Both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative are allowed;
  • Inflammatory arthritis (including psoriatic arthritis);
  • On bDMARDs treatment or will start bDMARDs within in 4 weeks. The bDMARDs included all anti-TNF-α agents, rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody), tocilizumab (anti-interleukin 6 receptor monoclonal antibody), abatacept (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 immunoglobulin), and all new biologics with indication of IA treatment;
  • No NUCs treatment in recent 6 months;
  • No limitation of the baseline HBV DNA level;
  • Total bilirubin level <2 mg/dL;
  • ALT < 2x ULN (<80 U/L).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child-Pugh class >B7;
  • Active EV bleeding within 4 weeks;
  • History of hepatic encephalopathy or intractable ascites;
  • Coexist with other primary liver diseases, such as active chronic hepatitis C, hepatitis D, autoimmune hepatitis, or Wilson's disease. (*HCV RNA undetectable is allowed to enroll);
  • Active malignancy;
  • Pregnant women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TAF arm

54 patients will be randomized into TAF arm*. TAF 25 mg QD will be initiated 7 days before bDMARDs, and continued for up to 144-weeks.

*for patients received rituximab (anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) will be enrolled into TAF arm, and TAF 25 mg QD will be initiated 7 days before rituximab, and continued for up to 144-weeks. Max 20 rituximab patients will be recruited.

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF, brand name: Vemlidy) is a hepatitis B virus nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor oral medication for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. It is a prodrug of tenofovir. Closely related to the commonly used reverse-transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, TAF has greater antiviral activity and better distribution into lymphoid tissues than that agent. Vemlidy was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in November 2016 and the TAIWAN Food and Drug Administration (TFDA) in April 2017.
Other Names:
  • TAF
  • Vemlidy
Other: Observation arm
54 patients will be randomized into observation arm initially. These patients will be closely monitored their HBV status (including qHBsAg and HBV DNA) for 48 weeks. TAF 25 mg QD will be initiated for 144 weeks in the presence of HBV reactivation, or after 48 weeks of observation.
Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF, brand name: Vemlidy) is a hepatitis B virus nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor oral medication for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. It is a prodrug of tenofovir. Closely related to the commonly used reverse-transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, TAF has greater antiviral activity and better distribution into lymphoid tissues than that agent. Vemlidy was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in November 2016 and the TAIWAN Food and Drug Administration (TFDA) in April 2017.
Other Names:
  • TAF
  • Vemlidy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1-year HBV reactivation rate
Time Frame: Up to 1-year
The assessment for the HBV reactivation is by the marker as hepatitis b viral load (unit: IU/ML).
Up to 1-year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serial change of renal and liver function
Time Frame: Up to 3-years

The assessment for the renal function is by the markers as serum creatinine (unit: mg/dL), eGFR (unit: 60 mL/min/1.73M^2) and serum inorganic phosphorus (unit: mg/dL); for the liver function is by the markers as ALT/AST (unit: U/L) and child-pugh score.

The child-pugh score is determined by scoring five clinical measures of liver disease. A score of 1, 2, or 3 is given to each measure, with 3 being the most severe, and the five clinical measures are: total bilirubin (unit: mg/dL), serum albumin (unit: g/dL), prothrombin time (unit: sec), absence/presence of ascites and absence/presence of hepatic encephalopathy. The higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Up to 3-years
Observation of bone mineral density at 48-weeks, 96-weeks, and 144-weeks
Time Frame: Up to 3-years
The assessment for the bone mineral density is by the marker as T-score.
Up to 3-years
The 1-year virological remission rate
Time Frame: Up to 1-year
The assessment for the HBV reactivation is by the marker as hepatitis b viral load (unit: IU/ML).
Up to 1-year
The 1-year HBeAg seroconversion rate
Time Frame: Up to 1-year
The assessment for the HBeAg seroconversion is by the marker as HBeAg (unit: COI).
Up to 1-year
The adverse reactions and compliance
Time Frame: Up to 3-years
The assessment for the adverse reactions is by the CTCAE v5.0, and the compliance is by the residual study drug.
Up to 3-years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammatory Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Tenofovir alafenamide

Subscribe