Psychogenic and Neurogenic Components in Patients With Psychogenic or Neuropathic Pruritus (PRURINEURO)

January 10, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Brest

Psychogenic and Neurogenic Components in Patients With Psychogenic or Neuropathic Pruritus : PRURINEURO, a Pilot Study

Scientific research on pruritus is in intensive development, with significant advances in understanding its pathophysiology. The causes of pruritus are very huge; they can be classified into different categories; we can find dermatological causes, systemic causes, neuropathic or neurological causes, psychogenic or even idiopathic causes.

The diagnosis of psychogenic pruritus is often over stated, when no cause is found; therefore, it is important to see what is really relieving from psychic so as not to over-diagnose and adopt a therapy more in line with the real problem of the patient. In daily practice, it seems to have a tendency to separate psychogenic and neurogenic etiologies in the diagnosis of neuropathic or psychogenic pruritus.

In the case of patients with psychogenic pruritus and neuropathic pruritus, no study has attempted to study the respective part of psychogenic and neurogenic components. Consequently, it would therefore be interesting to assess the areas of superposition and distinction of neuropathic and psychogenic pruritus.

The aim of this pilot study is to assess the psychogenic and neurogenic components of psychogenic pruritus and neuropathic pruritus in order to improve understanding of the mechanism and therefore their management.

The main objective of this study is to highlight the differences and the potential common characteristics between psychogenic and neuropathic pruritus in order to improve the differential diagnosis between these two pathologies.

The secondary objective of this study is to describe the psychogenic and neurogenic characteristics of psychogenic and neuropathic pruritus.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

PruriNeuro : Non-interventional single-center prospective study organized and practiced on humans for the development of medical knowledge, in which the data are obtained by validated questionnaires.

The duration of participation is estimated at 1 hour.

Questionnaires used :

  • Critères diagnostiques du prurit psychogène (Diagnosis criteria of functional itch disorder or psychogenic pruritus, from the French psychodermatology group)
  • NP5 questionnaire
  • Questionnaire de Brest
  • HADS
  • TAS-20
  • DN4i

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brest, France, 29609
        • CHRU de Brest

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with neuropathic or psychogenic pruritus consulting in the dermatology department of the CHRU de Brest.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Major (> 18 years old)
  • Diagnosis of psychogenic pruritus or neuropathic pruritus made in consultation, in day hospital or in hospital, within the dermatology department at the CHRU de Brest
  • Able to understand and agree to sign the information and non-opposition notice
  • No opposition of the patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship)
  • Minor (<18 years old)
  • Acute or chronic condition which could limit the patient's ability to the study's participation
  • Inability to understand and sign the information and non-opposition notice
  • Refusal to give no opposition

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with Psychogenic pruritus
Evaluation of the Psychogenic and Neurogenic Components using questionnaires
Patients with Neuropathic Pruritus
Evaluation of the Psychogenic and Neurogenic Components using questionnaires

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Questionnaire de Brest
Time Frame: at the enrollment
Qualitative assessment of pruritus, specifying the chronology, location, intensity, characteristics and effect on daily activities of the itching induced by pruritus
at the enrollment
HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Time Frame: at the enrollment
Total score for Depression or Anxiety 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case) 11-21 = Abnormal (case)
at the enrollment
NP5
Time Frame: at the enrollment
A score of two criteria out of five is optimal to discriminate Neuropathic pruritus (NP) from Non-NP
at the enrollment
TAS-20
Time Frame: at the enrollment
The TAS-20 is a self-report scale that is comprised of 20 items. Items are rated using a 5-point Likert scale whereby 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. There are 5 items that are negatively keyed (items 4, 5, 10, 18 and 19). The total alexithymia score is the sum of responses to all 20 items, while the score for each subscale factor is the sum of the responses to that subscale. The TAS-20 uses cutoff scoring: equal to or less than 51 = non-alexithymia, equal to or greater than 61 = alexithymia. Scores of 52 to 60 = possible alexithymia.
at the enrollment
DN4i
Time Frame: at the enrollment
score equal to or greater than 3 : in favor of neuropathic pruritus
at the enrollment
Diagnosis criteria of functional itch disorder or psychogenic pruritus, from the French psychodermatology group
Time Frame: at the enrollment
three compulsory criteria; Three additional criteria from seven items should also be present
at the enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 25, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 8, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 8, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All collected data that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available beginning two years and ending five years following the publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data access requests will be reviewed by the internal committee of Brest UH. Requestors will be required to sign and complete a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on Questionnaires

Subscribe