Timing of Suture Removal to Reduce Scarring in Skin Surgery

October 23, 2024 updated by: Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust

This is a single centre prospective randomized assessor blinded parallel group feasibility study that will be undertaken in the Royal Devon and Exeter Dermatology department.

The investigators will be looking at whether timing of percutaneous suture removal after skin surgery impacts on the incidence of suture marks and overall scar cosmesis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Stitch marks (also known as suture marks or track marks) are permanent marks left in the skin where the stitch has caused local tissue damage and scarring. The risk of these marks is in part thought to be related to the length of time that the stitches are left in place before removal. Stitches are normally left in place for longer on sites where the skin is under greater tension such as the chest or back because there is a concern that the wound may be more likely to open up on these sites. On the chest or back, stitches may be left in place for up to 14 days even though the chest or back is a common site for stitch marks to form.

The investigators are conducting a single centre prospective randomized assessor blinded parallel group feasibility study to estimate a sample size required for a properly powered RCT, and also to provide some preliminary data on the incidence of wound complications and overall scar cosmesis in each group.

All patients attending the dermatology department for wide local excision as part of their skin cancer treatment and primary closure of the subsequent wound will be considered for entry into the trial. Clinicians will identify potential participants during routine practice at their clinic visit. Patients who fulfil the entry criteria will be invited at that appointment to take part.

On the date of participants skin surgery, they will be consented and randomized to either 'suture removal at 7 days' or 'suture removal at 10 days'. Participants will then be booked for a 3 month follow up where the scar site will be evaluated from a patient and clinician perspective to assess suture marks and overall cosmesis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Exeter, United Kingdom
        • Royal Devon and Exeter Heavitree Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of 18 years old or above who had capacity to consent to surgery who were willing to attend follow-up appointments within the department

    • Patients undergoing wide local excision as part of their skin cancer treatment pathway
    • Lesions excised from the anterior chest or back
    • Post-operative wound >/= 10mm width
    • Wound could be closed with primary intention healing

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide valid informed consent and/or unwilling to attend for follow-up

    • Wounds where the edges could not be closely adhered with dermal sutures alone.
    • Wounds requiring a flap or graft for closure.
    • Patients requiring further treatment following original excision eg. Further WLE, radiotherapy etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Suture removal at 7 days
Suture removal at 7 days post skin surgery
Patients will either be randomized to have their sutures removed at 7 or 10 days post skin surgery
Active Comparator: Suture removal at 10 days
Suture removal at 10 days post skin surgery
Patients will either be randomized to have their sutures removed at 7 or 10 days post skin surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Measured Difference in POSAS and VAS Scores Between 7-day and 10-day Groups
Time Frame: 3 months

In patients undergoing wide local excision and primary wound closure for treatment of skin cancer does earlier removal of percutaneous sutures (7 days rather than 10 days) reduce the incidence of suture marks assessed at 3 months post-operatively.

The patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS) was used. The patient POSAS was comprised of a score between 1-10 each for pain, itch, colour, stiffness, thickness and irregularity.

The observer POSAS was comprised of a score between 1-10 each for vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability and surface area.

1 being normal skin and 10 abnormal skin. The total POSAS scores for both patients/observers were calculated by adding these up, with min/max 1-60. Higher scores equating to worse outcomes.

A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used (min/max 1 to 10) to assess the appearance of suture marks, with 1 being normal skin and 10 being abnormal.

3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Does Earlier Suture Removal Have an Impact (Negative or Positive) on Overall Scar Cosmesis and Wound Complication Rates (as Assessed by the Clinician and the Patient)?
Time Frame: 3 months
The impact on overall scar cosmesis was investigated using the POSAS score (results detailed above) and wound complications rates are detailed below for each group.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Emily McGrath, BMedSci BMBS, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Trust

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 26, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 26, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2011060

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Suture Related Complication

Clinical Trials on Timing of suture removal

Subscribe