Are Patients Willing and Capable of Removing Their Own Non-absorbable Sutures

1. Hypothesis

   If patients who are sutured with non-absorbable sutures in the Emergency Department (ED) are provided with the proper equipment and knowledge on how to remove their own sutures, they will be willing and capable of removing their own sutures.

2. Primary and Secondary Questions

Primary Question What number of patients in the study group will successfully remove their own sutures if they are provided with the equipment and information on how to do so compared with a control group who are treated and advised in the usual fashion? (follow up with family doctor or local medical clinic for suture removal)

Secondary Questions

1. Number of complications related to self removal of sutures as compared to traditional treatment. Complications measured were wound infections, dehiscence and prolonged bleeding (>30 min)
2. Number of physician visits related to self removal of sutures as compared to traditional treatment.
3. Patient satisfaction and comfort level related to self removal of sutures as compared with traditional treatment.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Suture Removal
• Intervention / Treatment: Procedure: Suture self removal; Procedure: Suture removal by family doctor or clinic

Detailed Description

Introduction/Background:

Patients who are sutured with non-absorbable sutures in the Emergency Department are asked to follow up with their family doctor or local medical clinic for suture removal. Suture removal, especially for simple lacerations is easy to do. Given the proper instructions and equipment suture removal could be done by the patient or a family member.

Objectives:

Are patients willing and capable of removing their own non-absorbable sutures? How many patients can successfully self remove their own sutures if given the proper equipment and instructions as compared with patients who are not given equipment and instructions? Would patient self removal result in less physician visits related to sutured wounds? What would be the complication rate for self removal of sutures be? Specific complications were wound infection, dehiscence and prolonged bleeding? Would patients be satisfied and comfortable in taking out their own sutures?

Methods:

Patients who are sutured with non absorbable sutures in the emergency department will be randomly enrolled into either of two groups. One group will receive wound care instructions alone. The second group will be given wound care instructions, a suture removal kit and instructions regarding self-removal to take home. Both groups will be contacted by telephone 14 days after suturing and asked questions concerning who removed their sutures, number of physician visits, time loss from work related to suture removal and complications related to sutures or suture removal. Questions regarding patient satisfaction with respect to self removal of sutures will also be asked.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 160
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Canada
  • British Columbia
    • New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
      • Royal Columbian and Eagle Ridge Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients 19 years and older that have wounds sutured in the ER with non-absorbable sutures

Exclusion Criteria:

• Inability to give consent secondary to alcohol, drugs or failure to speak English
• Complicated lacerations or lacerations which require close medical supervision
• Lacerations that are inaccessible to the patient (ie. scalp, back or buttock lacerations)
• Inability to contact patient by telephone for follow-up (no telephone, patient travelling out of country etc.)
• Patients who are immunocompromised, have diabetes mellitus or are on steroid medications

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Study group; Study group will be provided with suture removal instructions and suture removal kit and asked to consider removing their own sutures	Procedure: Suture self removal; Suture self removal
Placebo Comparator: Control group; Control group will be asked to have their sutures removed as they normally would (see family doctor or clinic)	Procedure: Suture removal by family doctor or clinic; As above

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Are patients willing and capable of removing their own non-absorbable sutures?	What number of patients in the study group will successfully remove their own sutures if they are provided with the equipment and information on how to do so compared with a control group who are treated and advised in the usual fashion? (follow up with family doctor or local medical clinic for suture removal)	3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Complications related to self removal of sutures	Number of complications related to self removal of sutures as compared to traditional treatment were measured. Complications measured were wound infections, dehiscence and prolonged bleeding (>30 min)	3 months
Physician Visits Related to Suture Self Removal	Number of physician visits related to self removal of sutures as compared to traditional treatment.	3 months
Patient Comfort and Satisfaction with Self-Removal of Sutures	Patient satisfaction and comfort level related to self removal of sutures as compared with traditional treatment. Measures used were a survey with a 5 choice answer.	3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Fraser Health
• Collaborators: University of British Columbia
• Investigators: Study Director: Peter J Macdonald, MD, Royal Columbian Hospital Department of Emergency Medicine, New Westminster, BC, Canada

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Albert, M., Daly, A., Krueger, J., Krueger, K., Meeusen, C., Vogelheim, C., & Jones, J. (2009). 421: Self-removal of sutures by emergency department patients. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 54(3S), 133-133.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: April 1, 2010
• Primary Completion (Actual): September 1, 2010
• Study Completion (Actual): October 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: February 9, 2010
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 13, 2011
• First Posted (Estimate): June 14, 2011

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): October 12, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 5, 2021
• Last Verified: October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: non-absorbable sutures; Suture self removal
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2010-004