Covid-19 Predictors: Safety of Gynecological Oncology Patients Undergoing Systemic Cancer Therapy (CO-SI-ONKO)

November 19, 2024 updated by: Heike Jansen, Technical University of Munich

COVID-19-Prädiktoren: Klinische Studie Zur Sicherheit Von Gynäkologisch Onkologischen Patientinnen Unter Onkologischer Systemtherapie - CO-SI-ONKO-Studie

We designed a monocenter prospective cohort study using PROM via app and remote monitoring via pho-toplethysmography (PPG). The application of these technologies enables an early detection of infections and therefore initiation of medical interventions. The study is conducted as feasibility analysis; primary endpoints are adherence (according to wearing time) and technical robustness.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Munich, Germany, 81675
        • Klinikum rechts der Isar, Frauenklinik, Technische Universität München

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • gynecological cancer
  • indication for systemic cancer therapy
  • patients who are legally competent and able to understand and follow instructions of the study staff
  • present informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no use if internet or applications
  • persons who are in a dependency or employment relationship with the study center
  • positive proof of COVID-19
  • affection of the external auditory canal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Telemedicine
Telemonitoring via PPG (photoplethysmography) and PROM (patient reported outcome monitoring) via app
description will follow

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compliance
Time Frame: 3 months
Compliance is defined as wearing time of the in-ear-sensor.
3 months
robustness of the ppg-signal
Time Frame: 3 months
number and duration of the ppg-signal transmitted
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of correct- and false-positive alerts
Time Frame: 3 months
definition via comparison of alerts with clinical data
3 months
number of contacts and hospitalization rates
Time Frame: 3 months
definition via comparison of alerts and resulting contacts and hospitalization rates with clinical data
3 months
infections
Time Frame: 3 months
detection of infesctions via suspected ppg-signal transmitted or PRO-data. This results in blood test zu verify acute infections.
3 months
therapy modifications
Time Frame: 3 months
dose-reductions (%), postponing of therapy cycles (time in days between actual and plannend date), therapy discontinuation
3 months
effect on quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months
change in minimum 9 points in the EORTC QLQ-C30-questionnaire is evaluated as significant change. In questions 1-28: 28-112 points can be achieved: higher scores are associated with a worse outcome. In questions 29-30:2-14 points can be achieved: higher scores are associated with a better outcome.
3 months
OS; PFS
Time Frame: 3 months
time between study inclusion and death; time between study inclusion and proven increasing tumor mass (number of days)
3 months
health-related costs
Time Frame: 3 months
cost-effectiveness analysis
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heike Jansen, Dr. med, Technical University of Munich
  • Study Director: Marion Kiechle, Prof. Dr. med., Technical University of Munich

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 29, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CO-SI-ONKO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Telemedicine

Clinical Trials on PPG and PROM

Subscribe