Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce Cardiovascular Recommendations - Heart Failure (BETTER CARE-HF)

October 27, 2022 updated by: NYU Langone Health

BETTER CARE-HF Pilot Study: Building Electronic Tools To Enhance and Reinforce CArdiovascular REcommendations - Heart Failure, a Pilot Study

This is a feasibility study using a cross-over design to implement and compare a best practice alert (BPA) with an automated in-basket message to inform providers when a patient with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is not on appropriate medical therapy. The data from this pilot study will lead to a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of the BPA versus an automated in-basket message, versus usual care (no intervention).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

An estimated 68,000 deaths per year nationwide can be attributed to gaps in care for patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), with the majority being due to lack of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA). Despite proven benefits in randomized trials, class I guideline recommendations, and published clinical performance measures, patients with HFrEF are often not on guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). While successful interventions for improvement in prescription of GDMT have often included multidisciplinary approaches with dedicated staff, the relatively high cost of hiring additional personnel has led to an interest in electronic health record (EHR)-based interventions. Prior studies on EHR-based interventions in this arena have mainly been conducted in the inpatient setting, which is limited to one encounter during acute hospitalization, a setting often complicated by renal dysfunction or hypotension that can limit prescription of MRA. The development and study of outpatient EHR-based alerts for HFrEF GDMT are needed. Two types of outpatient EHR-based interventions include best practice alerts (BPA) and automated in-basket messages. Both of these methods have limited data, with some studies showing benefit and others demonstrating provider fatigue and burnout. To our knowledge, there is no study that has directly compared these different types of EHR-based interventions.

This is a feasibility study using cross-over design at two outpatient clinics in a large health system to implement and compare a best practice alert (BPA) and an automated in-basket message to inform providers when a patient with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is not on appropriate medical therapy. The data from this study will lead to a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of the BPA versus an automated in-basket message, versus usual care (no intervention).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

596

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • NYU Langone Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Langone cardiology outpatients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiologist visit
  • Transthoracic echocardiogram with the most recent EF >= 40%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypotension: SBP < 95
  • Hyperkalemia: most recent K > 5.1, or any K >5.5
  • Renal dysfunction: eGFR < 30
  • Ventricular assist device
  • Hospice care

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Crossover
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Best Practice Alert group
Providers will receive a BPA at the time of visit for patients with HFrEF who are not on MRA (and who do not have contraindication to MRA). This alert will be visible on the first screen displayed in the electronic health record and will display the patient's current HFrEF therapies, EF, blood pressure, potassium, and glomerular filtration rate. The alert will give access to an outpatient heart failure order set, and also provide links to the most recent guidelines.
A BPA will fire in the EHR reminding care providers of the best practice when prescribing medical therapies for heart failure patients.
In-Basket Message group
Providers will receive a biweekly in-basket messages linking to a list of patients who have been seen in the past year with HFrEF who are not on MRA (and who do not have contraindication to MRA). This list will display each patient's current hFrEF therapies, EF, blood pressure, potassium, glomerular filtration rate, and date of last visit. From the list, providers can access the patient's chart, order medications, and document communication with the patient.
An In-Basket message will be sent biweekly to care providers with a reminder of the best practice when prescribing medical therapies for heart failure
Control group
Patients who will receive the current standard practice of care (no alerts)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients prescribed MRA
Time Frame: 14 days after alert
14 days after alert
Incidence of provider engagement with each alert type
Time Frame: 14 days after alert
Provider engagement is reported when the provider clicks on links or buttons within each alert.
14 days after alert

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 9, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Best Practice Alert (BPA)

Subscribe