Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal Block Versus Spinal Block With Levobupivacaine for Inguinal Hernia in Children

November 22, 2021 updated by: Ghada Mohammed AboelFadl, Assiut University

Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Caudal Block Versus Spinal Block With Levobupivacaine for Inguinal Hernia in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Neuraxial analgesia may improve postoperative outcomes for high-risk children who are susceptible to respiratory complications (e.g. post-operative apnea). The use of spinal anesthesia in infants and children requiring surgeries of the sub-umbilical regions is gaining considerable popularity worldwide. Caudal analgesia along with general anesthesia is a very popular regional technique for prolonged postoperative analgesia in different pediatric surgical procedures where the surgical site is sub-umbilical. Bupivacaine has been thoroughly studied, and a large global experience exists.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Neuraxial analgesia may improve postoperative outcomes for high-risk children who are susceptible to respiratory complications (post-operative apnea). In this population, spinal anesthesia has been proposed as a means to reduce post-operative complications, especially apnea and post-operative respiratory dysfunction, although this utility has been questioned.

Spinal anesthesia modifies the neuroendocrine stress response, ensures a more rapid recovery, and may shorten hospital stay with fewer opioid-induced side effects.

Caudal analgesia along with general anesthesia is a very popular regional technique for prolonged postoperative analgesia in different pediatric surgical procedures where the surgical site is sub-umbilical. Caudal anesthetics usually provide an-algesia for approximately 4-6 hours.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 715715
        • Assiut governorate

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 2-10 years.
  • Weight: 15-40 kg.
  • Sex: both males and females.
  • ASA physical status: 1-II.
  • Operation: surgery below the umbilicus.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergic reaction to local anesthetics (LAs).
  • Local or systemic infection (risk of meningitis).
  • Intracranial hypertension.
  • Hydrocephalus.
  • Intracranial hemorrhage.
  • Coagulopathy.
  • Hypovolemia.
  • Parental refusal.
  • Spinal deformities, such as spina bifida or myelomeningocele.
  • Presence of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt because of a risk of shunt infection or dural leak.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: spinal group
Plain, isobaric levobupivacaine(0.25%) 0.25 mg/kg
Plain, isobaric levobupivacaine (0.25%) 1 ml/kg
Other Names:
  • Levobupivacaine hydrate
Plain, isobaric levobupivacaine (0.25%) 0.25 mg/kg
Other Names:
  • levobupivacaine hydrate
Active Comparator: caudal group
Plain, isobaric levobupivacaine (0.25%) 1 ml/kg
Plain, isobaric levobupivacaine (0.25%) 1 ml/kg
Other Names:
  • Levobupivacaine hydrate
Plain, isobaric levobupivacaine (0.25%) 0.25 mg/kg
Other Names:
  • levobupivacaine hydrate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FLACC scale FLACC scores will be recorded. FLACC scores will be recorded. FLACC score will be recorded
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale will be recorded. Each category is scored on the 0 to 2 scale. Add the scores together (for a total possible score of 0 to 10).
24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total consumption of rescue analgesics
Time Frame: 24 hours
mg/24
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 11, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Levobupivacaine

Subscribe