More Individualized Care: Assessment and Recovery Through Engagement (MI-CARE)

March 25, 2026 updated by: Kaiser Permanente

Patient-centered Team-based Primary Care to Treat Opioid Use Disorder, Depression, and Other Conditions

The MI-CARE trial tests 12 months of telephone-based nurse care management for patients with depressive symptoms who take or have taken opioids at some time. The study tests whether offering nurse support to the patient and their primary care team that addresses these things and related issues can improve patients' health and well-being. Eligible subjects are identified automatically using health system data and randomly assigned 50:50 to either a no-contact usual care arm or to the arm offered the MI-CARE program.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The MI-CARE trial is a randomized encouragement trial that will test whether offering a primary care-based collaborative care (CC) model can increase opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment and improve depression outcomes among patients with:

  1. recent electronic health record (EHR) documentation of depressive symptoms, and
  2. evidence of OUD documented in the prior year.

The study objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of offering eligible primary care patients the MI-CARE CC program for up to 12 months when compared to usual primary care. Among all eligible primary care patients, MI-CARE and usual primary care will be compared to assess the following outcomes:

  • Aim 1: Days of OUD medication treatment (buprenorphine)
  • Aim 2: Improvement of depression symptoms.
  • Aim 3 (intervention arm only): Examining a) implementation using mixed-methods formative evaluation including reach, adoption, and implementation fidelity, and b) nurse care manager time needed to support the MICARE intervention.

The MI-CARE CC intervention is offered by a nurse care manager (NCM) and delivered by telephone (or video) visits to consenting patients. The intervention is designed to support "whole health" by engaging patients in medication treatment for OUD and depression, reducing depressive symptoms, and addressing common comorbid conditions that complicate OUD and depression (e.g., anxiety, pain, sleep, and other mental health and substance use disorders).

The Collaborative Care Model was originally designed to improve mental health outcomes in primary care and includes 5 essential elements. The CC intervention tested in the MI-CARE trial will include each of these elements: population-based care, patient-centered team care, evidence-based care, measurement-based treatment to target, and accountable care.

The MI-CARE program begins with NCM care focused on PCP and patient engagement:

  • Care team engagement - In addition to engaging the patient, the engagement process is designed to build the relationship between the NCM and the primary care team. Prior to a patient's first outreach call, the NCM informs the PCP that their patient was selected for the CC program and offers to have an initial brief (optional) call about the program with the care team. The NCM may also reach out to engage with specialty mental health providers who are working closely with the patient. If the patient does not have an established PCP, the NCM will offer to work with the patient to establish a PCP within the healthcare system. Additionally, each site's collaborative care consultants will message PCPs in their health plan when a given PCP's patient consents to participate in the MICARE intervention. These messages are to inform the PCP of the support the CC consultants provide each NCM in the management of consented patients to the intervention (including that the CC consultant's role may include various recommendations regarding patient care).
  • Patient engagement - This begins with a short series of "engagement" sessions to develop a relationship with the patient. Engagement sessions focus on eliciting a patient's health narrative, including current symptoms, and exploring the patient's (general) health goals, priorities, and preferences. Prior to the first engagement call the NCM reviews the patient's chart to obtain current treatment(s) for depression, OUD and related conditions. The NCM will build rapport by learning about patients' lives, how they are impacted by their health, eliciting the patients' thoughts on symptoms reported, and exploring how the program might help them. Motivational interviewing and shared decision-making techniques are used to elicit patient goals and priorities.

Beginning with engagement and throughout the follow up period, the NCM will use common elements of two evidence-based core behavioral approaches:

  • Motivational interviewing (MI) skills to elicit ambivalence and move patients toward wanting to improve OUD, depression or other related conditions; and
  • Behavioral activation (BA) to help participants build skills to increase positive adaptive experiences in their day-to-day lives and support broader treatment gains.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

805

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University Health
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
        • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Eligible patients must meet all 4 criteria:

  1. ≥1 in person or virtual encounter in a primary care setting in the 365 days prior to the data extraction date (pull date);
  2. Age ≥18 years at the pull date;
  3. ≥1 PHQ-9 depression screening score of ≥10 within the 7 days prior to the pull date.
  4. Evidence of potential OUD in the 365 days prior to and including the date of the qualifying PHQ-9 score. Any 1 of the following qualifies as evidence of potential OUD:

    1. ≥1 active OUD ICD-10 diagnosis code in any setting except labs;
    2. ≥1 prescription (orders or dispensed) for buprenorphine (oral formulations indicated for OUD, extended release injectable, and implant);
    3. ≥1 procedure code for buprenorphine (oral formulations indicated for OUD, extended release injectable, and implant);
    4. ≥1 ICD-10 codes for opioid overdose;
    5. ≥1 OUD ICD-10 code, including remission, and prescription (orders or dispensed) or procedure code for injectable naltrexone.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Patients are ineligible who meet any of the criteria below:

  1. The only indication of OUD or only PHQ available to determine eligibility came from data protected under 42 CFR Part 2;
  2. The patient has already been randomized to the trial or was outreached in the pilot study (including outreach to the primary care provider only);
  3. English interpreter required (per health system records).
  4. Any one of the following conditions in the 2 years prior to and including the date of the qualifying PHQ:

    1. Alzheimer's disease or dementia diagnosis, or medication to treat Alzheimer's or dementia.
    2. Severe cognitive limitations.
  5. Current active treatment for cancer with chemotherapy or radiation therapy in the past 3 months (not including non-melanoma skin cancers).
  6. Previously requested to not participate in research studies at the health system;
  7. Documentation of hospice care in the 2 years prior to and including the date of the qualifying PHQ score;
  8. Patient is actively being outreached for (or is participating in) depression care management (Kaiser Permanente Washington only)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MI-CARE program
Those automatically identified as eligible and randomized to the MI-CARE arm are outreached by a study nurse care manager and offered the 12-month long virtual Collaborative Care program by telephone or video visits. Individuals are free to accept or decline the offer (e.g., stop/restart, not accept right away) during the 12 months after their randomization date.

This study evaluates whether offering nurse collaborative care management for 12 months by telephone or video can improve depression-related symptoms, increase access to evidence-based medication treatment for opioid use problems, as well as decreasing adverse health events. Participants randomized to the nurse support arm can work with the nurse at no cost for up to 12 months via phone or video visits.

The nurse asks questions about stress, mood, worry, pain, sleep, and medication and substance use; participants choose what to focus on. The nurse meets weekly with clinical consultants who may recommend treatment options, tailored to the patient. The participant and their regular provider(s) can discuss the options and decide which to try. The nurse and primary care provider can then help the patient access selected options. The nurse can also offer behavioral activation to help build skills to increase day-to-day positive adaptive experiences and support broader treatment gains.

No Intervention: Usual care
Those identified as eligible and randomized to the usual care arm have no contact with the study. All outcome data for both study arms are collected from secondary, electronic sources.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Days of buprenorphine medication treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD)
Time Frame: days 1-365 after randomization
A continuous measure of days of OUD treatment with buprenorphine in the 365 days after randomization from secondary electronic data sources.
days 1-365 after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in depressive symptoms
Time Frame: 3-13 months after randomization
Change in depressive symptoms from the study qualifying Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) score to follow-up PHQ score documented as part of routine clinical care 3-13. months later from secondary electronic data sources. The 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 27. the 2-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ2) has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 6. An increasing PHQ score indicates an increase in depressive symptoms.
3-13 months after randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Buprenorphine treatment or improved depressive symptoms
Time Frame: 1 day - 13 months after randomization

Composite measure identifying whether a patient is treated with buprenorphine and/or has documentation of clinically-significant improvement in depressive symptoms from secondary electronic data sources:

  • Treatment with buprenorphine is a binary measure of treatment with buprenorphine formulations for pain or OUD defined as > 90 days of buprenorphine during the 12-month follow up period.
  • Clinically significant improvement in depressive symptoms is a binary measure of documented clinical response of depressive symptoms during follow-up (50% decrease in PHQ9 score or negative PHQ2 screen).
1 day - 13 months after randomization
Major acute adverse health events
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
A composite of any major adverse event over 12 months of follow-up, which includes: opioid overdose, other drug overdose, suicide attempt or other self-harm, hospitalizations (opioid and non-opioid), or death (from secondary electronic data sources).
12 months after randomization
Serious opioid related event
Time Frame: 12 months after randomization
A count of the number of serious opioid-related events over 12 months of follow up; defined as emergency department visits or hospital admissions with a primary OUD or opioid-related diagnosis or an opioid-related overdose (lethal of non-lethal), from secondary electronic data sources.
12 months after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lynn DeBar, PhD, Kaiser Permanente
  • Principal Investigator: Katharine A Bradley, MD, MPH, Kaiser Permanente

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The MI-CARE trial will involve analysis of a large amount of detailed proprietary secondary electronic health plan data from the Kaiser Permanente Washington and Indiana University Health systems, and state-wide datasets, e.g., prescription monitoring programs (PMPs). We will seek to obtain data use agreements that allow us to share all de-identified data. However, if that is not possible, we will share those de-identified data for which we do have permission to share.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Although our trial had planned to publicly share data with the NIMH data archive (NDA), they determined on February 24, 2022 that they would remove our grant from NDA data sharing because the subjects in this trial do not have signed consent forms.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on More Individualized Care: Assessment and Recovery through Engagement (MI-CARE)

Subscribe