Optimal Adjuvant Intravesical Therapy for Intermediate Risk Non Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

December 21, 2021 updated by: Amr Abdel-Lateif El-Sawy, Mansoura University
The objective of this prospective, single-center randomized controlled trial is to identify the optimal adjuvant intravesical therapy in patients with intermediate risk (IR) non muscle invasive bladder cancer by comparing two commonly utilized intravesical regimens; intravesical immunotherapy (BCG) and intravesical chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Bladder cancer (BC) represents a frequent urologic malignancy, and is mainly diagnosed as non-muscle invasive, At presentation, approximately 30% of patients have muscle-invasive BC (clinical T2 or higher) .

Both the natural history of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and its treatment strategies are highly variable. Although some patients never experience disease recurrence, others experience disease progression and eventually die of their disease .

In the absence of intravesical treatment, a patient with non-muscle-invasive BC has a 47% probability of disease recurrence within 5 years of diagnosis and a 9% probability of progression to muscle-invasive disease .

Low-, intermediate- and high-risk categories have been defined to help guide the treatment of patients with NMIBC (Ta, T1, and CIS). Treatment of NMIBC is now relatively well-defined for high-risk and low-risk disease presentation, and awaits further refinement through improvements in therapeutic options .

Solitary low-grade tumors, especially smaller lesions (3 cm or less), respond best to resection and immediate instillation of intravesical agents, whereas higher risk lesions, such as carcinoma in situ and high-grade T1 stage disease, have demonstrated good response to BCG when given on a schedule of induction (an initial 6-week course) and maintenance (3-weekly courses every 6 months for 3 years) .

However, while low- and high-risk diseases have been well-classified, the intermediate-risk (IR) category has traditionally comprised a heterogeneous group of patients that do not fit into either of these categories . As a result, many urologists remain uncertain about the categorization of patients as 'intermediate-risk' as well as the selection of the most appropriate therapeutic option for this patient population .

The pathology of IR NMIBC has been defined by different organizations (American Urological Association, European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and International Consultation on Urological Diseases) as those patients with recurrent (<1 year) low-grade Ta disease, solitary low-grade Ta >3cm, multifocal low-grade Ta disease or high-grade Ta disease <3 cm .

Current recommendations for therapy from the aforementioned organizations suggest a basic role for induction and maintenance therapy with either immunotherapy or chemotherapy. Data from a number of recent trials suggest that BCG with maintenance is superior to maintenance chemotherapy in this population as regard to recurrence free survival. On the other hand, no significant benefit of BCG compared with chemotherapy for tumor progression was identified.

Most of these studies were limited by its heterogeneity of patients (non-standardized definition of IR) and non-unified regimen of intravesical treatment (course or utilized chemotherapeutic agent). A well-designed randomized controlled trial with a rigorous methodology is warranted to provide a solid evidence for best practice in this special group of patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • DK
      • Mansoura, DK, Egypt, 35516
        • Recruiting
        • Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (aged >18 years)
  • Patients with primary or recurrent papillary NMIBC.
  • Complete TURBT.
  • Patients with IR NMIBC confirmed by histopathology.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give informed consent.
  • Patients with history of previous radiotherapy or systemic chemotherapy.
  • Patients suffering from immuno-deficiency or other malignancies.
  • Patients with history of hypersensitivity reaction to BCG or epirubicin.
  • Examination under anesthesia (EUA) reveals palpable bladder mass.
  • Patients with low or high risk NMIBC by histopathology

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Intravesical immunotherapy (BCG) group
Patients will receive induction and maintenance BCG after complete TURBT.
Active Comparator: Intravesical chemotherapy (Epirubicin) group
Patients will receive induction and maintenance epirubicin after complete TURBT.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumor recurrence rate
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of patient who will develop Recurrence rate during follow up
2 years
Tumor Progression rate
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of patient who will develop Progression rate during follow up
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Side effects from intravesical treatments
Time Frame: 2 years
Side effects from intravesical treatments
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trials on Intravesical Bcg

Subscribe