The Relationship Of The Surgical Pleth Index Values With Postoperative Pain Score And Analgesia Consumption

December 6, 2021 updated by: Dilek Hundur, Istanbul University

The Relationship on The Surgical Pleth Index Values Observed at The End of The Surgical Procedure With Postoperative Pain Score and Analgesia Consumption

Postoperative pain management has an important role in anesthesia practice. In order to ensure postoperative patient comfort, postoperative rehabilitation should start early and be managed effectively1. It is known that if adequate analgesia is not provided before the patient wakes up, the severity of pain and the total opioid consumption increases. This increased opioid use causes complications such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, increased sleepiness and respiratory depression2. For this reason, the provision of adequate analgesia before the patient is awakened from general anesthesia has an important place in the process. Measurement of pain has different characteristics in patients under sedation or general anesthesia compared to conscious patients. However, since it is not possible for the patient to define pain under general anesthesia, different measurement and evaluation methods are needed. In order to monitor the intraoperative balance between nociception and antinociception, several non-invasive methods with different physiological approaches have been researched and made available for use in the last decade. The aim of these methods is individualize the intraoperative and postoperative opioid dose3. In this context, it has been suggested that the Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) method can be used in the evaluation of the analgesic component of anesthesia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

After arrival in the operating room, patients were monitored with electrocardiogram (ECG), non-invasive arterial pressure measurement, pulse oximetry, neuromuscular monitoring (GE Datex, Ohmeda TOF module), entropy (GE Datex, Ohmeda Entropy Module) and SPI. Intravenous midazolam (0.03-0.05 mg/kg), fentanyl (1mcg/kg) were used before induction of anaesthesia. For anesthetic induction, propofol was administered until the entropy value fell below 60, followed by rocuronium was performed intravenous 0.6mg/kg. Patients were intubated with endotracheal tube than the mechanical ventilation was initiated with a mixture of O2 and air with FiO2 0.5 and adjusted to maintain end-tidal CO2 pressure of 35 and 40 mmHg. Intravenous propofol and remifentanil infusion were used for anesthesia maintenance and entropy was maintained below 60. Furthermore, SPI was maintained below 50.

Tenoxicam 20 mg, paracetamol 1 g and 0.5 mg/kg tramadol intravenously were administered 30 minutes before the end of the surgery to each patient who had no contraindications. After the last suture, the anesthetic agents were stopped and was considered the end of the surgery. Then SPI data were recorded at one-minute intervals during the last five minutes (6 times in total) until the entropy value reached 60. Patients who has cooperation were extubated and taken to the recovery room. The first time that the patients cooperated in the recovery room was considered as the zeroth minute. During the postoperative observation, the patient's pain score was questioned using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) every five minutes. If NRS≥4, intravenous tramadol 10 mg (100 mg as the maximum dose) was administered to the patient. The patient was followed in the recovery room for 30 minutes and until NRS <4. However, if NRS≥4 was still present at the end of the observation period, an additional 2 mg dose of morphine was administered. The maximum dose of morphine was determined as 0.1mg/kg.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34093
        • Istanbul University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 63 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged 18 to 65 years with ASA physical status I-III who received craniotomy and intracranial mass excision in the ITF Neurosurgery Clinic were enrolled in the study after providing written informed consent

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 to 65 years
  • ASA physical status I-III
  • Who received craniotomy and intracranial mass excision

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed diabetic neuropathy
  • Using pacemaker
  • Needing vasoactive agent during the observation
  • Using ketamine
  • Using agents such as beta-blockers, beta-agonists, sympatholytic agents, atropine, neostigmine that will affect the sympatho-vagal balance during the observation period
  • The patients who could not provide sufficient cooperation for scoring were not included in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acute Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: Postoperative 30 minutes
During the postoperative observation, the patient's pain score was questioned using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Postoperative 30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mukadder Orhan Sungur, Prof., Istanbul University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 8, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Analgesia

Clinical Trials on Surgical Pleth Index (SPI)

3
Subscribe