Clinical Of Chocolate Balloon Dilatation Versus Plain Balloon Dilatation to Treat Arteriosclerosis Occlusive Disease of Lower Extremity

October 9, 2022 updated by: Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
This is a Prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate the difference of safety,effectiveness between chocolate balloon and plain balloon dilatation in treatment of infrapopliteal artery lesions.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate the difference of safety,effectiveness between chocolate balloon and plain balloon dilatation in treatment of infrapopliteal artery lesions. Patients with femoral-popliteal artery lesions in our department were randomly assigned to the chocolate balloon group and plain balloon dilatation group. Compare the ischemic improvement rate (limb salvage rate, postoperative patency rate) and the complications rate of two different treatments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

144

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100053
        • Recruiting
        • Gu Yong Quan
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria: 1.all patients signed an informed consent form; 2.digital subtraction angiography (DSA) revealed femoropopliteal artery stenosis above 70% or occlusion resulting in claudication (Rutherford clinical category-Becker class II-III2-3) or critical limb ischemia (CLI) (Rutherford clinical category 4-5-Becker class IV-V) 3.with unobstructed vascular inflow; 4.with at least a vessel runoff; 5. good compliance and regular follow-up.

Exclusion criteria: 1. Acute or subacute lower limb ischemia caused by acute intraluminal thrombus within the target lesion.; 2. Severe calcified lesions (grade 4 in the PACSS scale); 3. In-stent restenosis lesion or surgical arterial bypass grafting; 4. Severe renal insufficiency: creatinine level greater than 2.5 mg/dL; 5. Platelet count below 100,000/μL or with antiplatelet / anticoagulation contraindications; 6. Immunologic diseases or malignant diseases; 7. Ongoing active infection; 8. Decompensated congestive heart failure or acute coronary syndrome; 9. Refuse to sign the informed consent Unwillingness to comply with follow-up suggestions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention: Chocolate balloon
Chocolate balloon group
chocolate balloon dilatation
Experimental: Intervention: plain balloon
plain balloon group
plain balloon dilatation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
12-month Primary Patency Rate
Time Frame: 12 months
systolic velocity ratio >2.4 as measured by Duplex ultrasound.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
12-month Limb Salvage Rate
Time Frame: 12 months
Limb Salvage is defined as the freedom from secondary major amputation
12 months
Major Adverse Events at 12-month Post Procedure
Time Frame: 12 months
Major adverse events included death, index limb ischemia, index limb amputation, clinically driven target lesion revascularization , and significant embolic events, which were defined as causing end-organ damage.
12 months
Technical success rate
Time Frame: 1 day
Technical success was defined as residual stenosis less than 30% by final
1 day
freedom from clinically-driven TLR rate
Time Frame: 12 months
it is defined as thefreedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemia

Clinical Trials on chocolate balloon

3
Subscribe