Cost-effective Analysis of Two Approximation Devices in Closure of Gastrointestinal Defects

February 14, 2024 updated by: Salmaan Azam Jawaid, MD, Baylor College of Medicine
This is a prospective, randomized research trial that aims to evaluate the clinical results of two different approximation methods to close the tissue defect caused by removing gastrointestinal polyps.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Closure of GI defects after endoscopic resection decreases the rate of post resection bleeding. Traditionally, standard TTS clips have been used to close GI wall defects with some success. However, complete apposition of the resection wall edges occurs only 68% of the time. Endoscopic suturing with the traditional Overstitch device can achieve complete closure in almost 100% of defects. However, this device is costly, requires the use of a double channel therapeutic endoscope, and at times can be difficult to maneuver. Recently, a novel FDA approved TTS tissue helix and suture device (X-tack) was developed to overcome the challenges of the traditional Overstitch device. Animal models have demonstrated the X-tack system is superior to TTS in effecting large mucosal defects and maintain similar durability. At BCM, we have been using the X-tack system routinely in closure of GI defects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

82

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
  • Patient can provide informed consent.
  • Patient is referred for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric, small bowel, or colorectal lesion.
  • Post resection defect > 3cm.
  • Lesion 2cm or greater from the dentate line.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is < 18 years of age.
  • Patient refused and/or unable to provide consent.
  • Patient is pregnant.
  • Patient is currently incarcerated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Through-the-Scope clip group
Through the scope Dual Action Tissue Clip (DAT) clipping equipment and technique performed in closure of GI defect area after polyp removal.
Patients will have their endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as per standard-of-care. Afterwards, patient will receive one of two intervention options for the closure of the GI defect following polyp removal.
Active Comparator: X-Tack suturing group
Use of Endoscopic Helix Tacking System (X-Tack) by Apollo Endosurgery for the closure of GI defect after polyp removal.
Patients will have their endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as per standard-of-care. Afterwards, patient will receive one of two intervention options for the closure of the GI defect following polyp removal.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost of each closure
Time Frame: Day 1
Total cost amount for equipment used in closure of GI defect
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of complete closure of GI defect
Time Frame: Day 1 (end of procedure)
Complete closure achieved by assigned closure type as assessed by performing physician
Day 1 (end of procedure)
Successful Tissue approximation
Time Frame: Day 1 (End of procedure)
Less than or equal to 15mm of visible resection bed at its widest portion after the device is used for tissue approximation
Day 1 (End of procedure)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Closure type

3
Subscribe