- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05167214
The Acute Effect Of Different Kinesiological Tape
December 20, 2021 updated by: mustafa gulsen, Baskent University
The Acute Effect Of Different Kinesiological Tape Application On Pain, Functional Performance And Trunk Endurance In Young Adults With Chronic Back Pain
This study aims to compare the acute effects of different kinesiology tapes on pain, functional performance and trunk endurance in young adults with chronic low back pain.
Seventy young adults with chronic low back pain between the ages of 18-40 were included in our study.
The individuals included in our study were divided into two groups by a simple randomization method.
Star-shaped kinesiology taping was applied to the 1st group, and I-shaped kinesiology taping was applied to the 2nd group.
The demographic and physical characteristics of the individuals who agreed to participate in the study were recorded.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to evaluate pain before taping, immediately after taping and 4 days after taping, Oswestry low back pain disability scale (OLBPDS) to assess disability level, Lumbar Flexion Repeat Speed Test, Sit-and-Stand Test to evaluate functional performance in both groups.
Biering Sorenson Test was applied to evaluate the forward bending test with weight and trunk endurance.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
Star-shaped kinesiology taping was applied to the 1st group, and I-shaped kinesiology taping was applied to the 2nd group.
The demographic and physical characteristics of the individuals who agreed to participate in the study were recorded.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to evaluate pain before taping, immediately after taping and 4 days after taping, Oswestry low back pain disability scale (OLBPDS) to assess disability level, Lumbar Flexion Repeat Speed Test, Sit-and-Stand Test to evaluate functional performance in both groups.
Biering Sorenson Test was applied to evaluate the forward bending test with weight and trunk endurance.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
70
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey
- Okan University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 40 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- between the ages of 18-40 who accept participating in the research,
- low back pain for at least 3 months,
- have no perception problems
- can cope well,
- individuals who regularly come to the controls and evaluations of the physical therapy program.
Exclusion Criteria:
- undergone spinal surgery,
- have complain of low back pain due to inflammatory, tumoral, metabolic cause, orthopedic (pes planus, genu varum, genu valgum, scoliosis, etc.) or neurological (Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke, etc.) problems that prevent treatment, spine or lower back pain.
- have extremity surgery,
- have another musculoskeletal disorder affecting the lower extremity,
- pregnancy
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Star tape
Group 1 ( n=35) was applied with the star technique.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to evaluate pain before taping, immediately after taping and 4 days after taping, Oswestry low back pain disability scale (OLBPDS) to assess disability level, Lumbar Flexion Repeat Speed Test, Sit-and-Stand Test to evaluate functional performance in both groups.
Biering Sorenson Test was applied to evaluate the forward bending test with weight and trunk endurance.
Individuals in both groups were told to continue with their daily lives while on the tapes.
It was stated that the bands should stay on the applied area for 4 days, that they can have a bath while the bands are on, and that if the bands are uncomfortable or excessive itching on the skin, the individuals can remove the bandage with an oily solution.
No itching, redness, or allergic reactions was observed in either group.
|
The Acute Effect Of Different Kinesiological Tape Application On Pain, Functional Performance And Trunk Endurance In Young Adults With Chronic Back Pain
|
|
Placebo Comparator: I Tape
Group 2 (n=35) was applied in the form of I tape.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to evaluate pain before taping, immediately after taping and 4 days after taping, Oswestry low back pain disability scale (OLBPDS) to assess disability level, Lumbar Flexion Repeat Speed Test, Sit-and-Stand Test to evaluate functional performance in both groups.
Biering Sorenson Test was applied to evaluate the forward bending test with weight and trunk endurance.
Individuals in both groups were told to continue with their daily lives while on the tapes.
It was stated that the bands should stay on the applied area for 4 days, that they can have a bath while the bands are on, and that if the bands are uncomfortable or excessive itching on the skin, the individuals can remove the bandage with an oily solution.
No itching, redness, or allergic reactions was observed in either group.
|
The Acute Effect Of Different Kinesiological Tape Application On Pain, Functional Performance And Trunk Endurance In Young Adults With Chronic Back Pain
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Kinesiological Tape Application
Time Frame: 4 days
|
The individuals included in our study were divided into two groups by a simple randomization method.
Star-shaped kinesiology taping was applied to the 1st group, and I-shaped kinesiology taping was applied to the 2nd group.
|
4 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 4 days
|
Patients were asked to mark the pain they felt on a 10 cm scale between '0' (I have no pain) and '10' (I have unbearable pain), the distance between the marked point and the starting point was measured and recorded as data.
|
4 days
|
|
Oswestry Scale
Time Frame: 4 days
|
The Turkish version of the Oswestry Scale was applied to individuals to measure the low back pain disability level of the individuals.
The study on the validity of the questionnaire was conducted by Yakut et al.
In this scale, there are 10 questions evaluating various activities of daily living and 6 options for each question with a score between 0 and 5. 0-4 points as no disability, 5-14 points as mild, 15-24 points as moderate, 25-34 points as severe and 35-50 points as complete functional disability.
The lowest score obtained from the scale is 0, and the highest score is 50.
A score of 50 indicates the maximum level of functional disability.
|
4 days
|
|
Lumbar Flexion Repeat Speed Test
Time Frame: 4 days
|
To evaluate functional performance.
Before starting the test, warm-up flexion was performed 3 times, and the individual was asked to bend forward 10 times as fast as he could, while standing and both heels together, and to straighten as fast as he could again.
The chronometer was started with the start command, the chronometer was stopped after 10 consecutive flexion and extension were completed, and the elapsed time was recorded in seconds.
|
4 days
|
|
Sit-and-Stand Test
Time Frame: 4 days
|
To evaluate functional performance is the Sit-Up test (OKHT).
After sitting on a chair, the individual was asked to get up and sit down as fast as he could 5 times, the chronometer was started with the start command, and the elapsed time was recorded in seconds after the last sitting was completed.
|
4 days
|
|
Biering Sorenson Test
Time Frame: 4 days
|
to assess the trunk endurance.
Trunk Extensor Muscle Endurance (Biering-Sorensen Test): The individual was prone placed by hanging from the bed from the anterior superior of the spina iliaca, and was fixed at the gastrocnemius muscle level.
He was asked to keep his torso parallel to the ground by clasping his hands on the chest.
The time that parallelism was maintained was recorded.
|
4 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 15, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 25, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
May 10, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 19, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 20, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
December 22, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 22, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 20, 2021
Last Verified
December 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BaskentUU
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Back Pain
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Federal University of Minas GeraisRecruitingBack Pain | Low Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Back Pain Lower Back ChronicBrazil
-
Neuronoff, IncOhio Pain ClinicCompletedChronic Pain | Lower Back Pain ChronicUnited States
-
Washington D.C. Veterans Affairs Medical CenterRecruitingChronic Back Pain | Chronic Pain (back / Neck)United States
-
Kirsehir Ahi Evran UniversitesiHacettepe University; Selcuk UniversityRecruitingLow Back Pain, Mechanical | Non Specific Chronic Low Back Pain | Low Back Pain, ChronicTurkey
-
Adia Med of Winter Park LLCRecruitingLower Back Pain | Chronic Lower Back Pain | Chronic Mechanical Lower Back PainUnited States
-
Marco LoggiaNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)CompletedLow Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Back Pain Lower Back Chronic | Back Pain With Radiation | Back Pain Without Radiation | Back AcheUnited States
-
Rhode Island HospitalRecruitingChronic Pain | Chronic Low-back PainUnited States
-
University of FaisalabadNot yet recruiting
-
University of BarcelonaHospital Clinic of BarcelonaRecruitingBack Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP)Spain