Food Supplementation With Diuripres for Blood Pressure Modulation in Subjects With High-Normal Blood Pressure (CONDOR)

January 30, 2024 updated by: Arrigo F.G. Cicero, University of Bologna

Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Effect of a Combined Nutraceutical and Placebo on Blood Pressure Level, Vascular Health, and Metabolic Parameters in Subjects Affected by Normal-High Blood Pressure

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of mortality worldwide, reaching the 31% of deaths in 2012. CVDs represent also the major cause of disability in developed countries and has been estimated that their growing burden could lead to a global increase in loss of disability-adjusted life years (DALY), from a loss of 85 million DALYs of 1990 to a loss of ~ 150 million DALYs in 2020, becoming a major cause of no psychic responsible for lost productivity.

Several risk factors contribute to the aetiology and development of CVD. These factors have been traditionally stratified into modifiable risk factors through the lifestyle changes or by taking a pharmacologic treatment (e.g. hypertension, smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia) and not modifiable risk factors (age, male sex and family history). Essential hypertension is the most common modifiable risk factor in the general population, with a prevalence in Western Countries -including Italy- ranging between about 25-45%.

Given the large prevalence of the disease of the general population, hypertension is responsible for the vast majority of CVD in individuals with different CV risk profiles, despite the availability of effective and well tolerated antihypertensive therapies. In this regard, several reports have shown that hypertensive patients often present additional CV and metabolic risk factors, mostly hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, metabolic syndrome and diabetes, which further contribute to increase the individual risk of developing hypertension-related complications, including stroke, end-stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, and CVD death. The concomitant presence of hypertension and dyslipidaemia is also responsible for the objective difficulty in achieving the recommended therapeutic targets for BP and cholesterol levels in a setting of clinical practice.

Several pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions have been proposed for ameliorating the relatively low rates of control of hypertension. Among these, an extensive use of nutrients and food supplements has been shown to provide favourable effects in the management and control of high-normal blood pressure (BP) (or pre-hypertension), that increases the risk of developing hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and renal failure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Among food supplements largely used in this field, Orthosiphon stamineus Benth leaf extract has been recognized for its well-known diuretic properties; extract of hawthorn (Crataegus curvisepala Lind.) has been shown to exert a renal-protective effect in high salt-induced hypertension and extract of hibiscus (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) is well known for its antihypertensive and vasodilator effect in human. Moreover, supplementation with magnesium has been recently found to play a critical role in BP regulation, through directly stimulating prostacyclin and nitric oxide formation, modulating endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilation, reducing vascular tone and reactivity, and preventing vascular injury via its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory functions.

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of dietary supplementation of a combined food supplement (NUT) containing magnesium, standardized extract of orthosiphon (Orthosiphon stamineus Benth), standardized extract of hawthorn (Crataegus curvisepala Lind.) and standardized extract of hibiscus (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) compared to placebo, on blood pressure and other markers of vascular aging in subjects with high-normal blood pressure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy
        • S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects agree to participate in the study and having dated and signed the informed consent form;
  • Subjects who have the capability to communicate, to make themselves understood, and to comply with the study's requirements;
  • Subjects with high-normal blood pressure (SBP= 130-139 mmHg and/or DBP= 85-89 mmHg);
  • Subjects who, according to the SCORE charts, have a low or moderate cardiovascular risk (defined as a total cardiovascular risk < 5%) and for whom, according to 2018 ESC/ESH guidelines, the intervention strategy does not require a pharmacological intervention.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects already affected by cardiovascular diseases (secondary prevention) or with an estimated 10 years cardiovascular disease risk> 5%;
  • Obesity (Body mass index>30 kg/m2);
  • Type 1 or type 2 diabetes;
  • Assumption of anti-hypertensive drugs or food supplements, or drugs potentially affecting blood pressure;
  • Lipid-lowering treatment not stabilized since at least 2 months;
  • Anticoagulants therapy;
  • Known current thyroid, gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary diseases;
  • Any medical or surgical condition that would limit the patient adhesion to the study protocol;
  • Abuse of alcohol or drugs (current or previous);
  • History of malignant neoplasia in the 5 years prior to enrolment in the study;
  • History or clinical evidence of inflammatory disease such as severe arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus or chronic inflammatory diseases or current therapy with immunosuppressive agents or long-term glucocorticoids;
  • History or clinical evidence of any significant concomitant disease that could compromise the safety of the subject or the possibility of completing the study;
  • Known previous intolerance to one component of the tested nutraceuticals;
  • Women in fertile age not using consolidated contraceptive methods;
  • Pregnancy and Breastfeeding.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo comparator
Placebo
Oral administration: 2 tablets/day at evening meal
Active Comparator: Active Comparator
Dietary supplement

Dietary supplement formulated with magnesium, standardized extract of orthosiphon, standardized extract of hawthorn and standardized extract of hibiscus. Each tablet contains: 0.1 g magnesium, 0.25 g standardized extract of orthosiphon (Orthosiphon stamineus Benth), 0.16 standardized extract of hawthorn (Crataegus curvisepala Lind.) and 0.08 g standardized extract of hibiscus (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.).

Oral administration: 2 tablets/day at evening meal

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Systolic blood pressure absolute reduction from baseline and between groups
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute reduction of systolic blood pressure after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Diastolic blood pressure absolute reduction from baseline and between groups
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute reduction of diastolic blood pressure after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Systolic blood pressure absolute reduction from baseline and between groups
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute reduction of systolic blood pressure after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Diastolic blood pressure absolute reduction from baseline and between groups
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute reduction of diastolic blood pressure after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Percent reduction from baseline and between groups in vascular reactivity
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Percent reduction of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Percent reduction from baseline and between groups in vascular reactivity
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Percent reduction of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in body weight
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of body weight after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in body weight
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of body weight after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in body mass index
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of body mass index after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in body mass index
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of body mass index after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in waist circumference
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of waist circumference after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in waist circumference
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of waist circumference after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in hip circumference
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of hip circumference after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in hip circumference
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of hip circumference after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in waist/hip circumference ratio
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change waist/hip circumference ratio after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in waist/hip circumference ratio
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change waist/hip circumference ratio after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in the index of central obesity
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of the index of central obesity after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in the index of central obesity
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of the index of central obesity after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in the visceral adiposity index
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of the visceral adiposity index after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in the visceral adiposity index
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of the visceral adiposity index after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in fat and lean mass
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of fat and lean mass after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in fat and lean mass
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of fat and lean mass after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in renal function
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of creatinine and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in renal function
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of creatinine and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in serum lipids
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of serum concentrations of total cholesterol, triglycerides - TG, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol - HDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol - non HDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol - LDL-C after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in lipids ratios
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of lipids ratios after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in serum lipids
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of serum concentrations of total cholesterol, triglycerides - TG, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol - HDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol - non HDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol - LDL-C after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in serum lipids ratios
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of lipids ratios after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in high sensitivity C reactive protein
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of high sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in high sensitivity C reactive protein
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of high sensitivity C reactive protein (hsCRP) after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in serum uric acid concentrations
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of serum uric acid after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in serum uric acid concentrations
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of serum uric acid after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in fasting plasma glucose concentrations
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of fasting plasma glucose after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in fasting plasma glucose concentrations
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of fasting plasma glucose after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Treatment acceptability
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Evaluation of patients' satisfaction assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale (with two end points representing 0 -low acceptability- and 10 -high acceptability-) after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Treatment acceptability
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Evaluation of patients' satisfaction assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale (with two end points representing 0 -low acceptability- and 10 -high acceptability-) after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Treatment tolerability
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Evaluation of treatment's tolerability assessed by patients with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale (with two end points representing 0 -no pain- and 10 -pain as bad as it could possibly be-) after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Treatment tolerability
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Evaluation of treatment's tolerability assessed by patients with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale (with two end points representing 0 -no pain- and 10 -pain as bad as it could possibly be-) after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in liver transaminases and gamma glutamil transferase
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute reduction of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and gamma glutamil transferase after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in liver transaminases and gamma glutamil transferase
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute reduction of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase and gamma glutamil transferase after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in augumentation pressure
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of augumentation pressure after 4 weeks of treatment assessed by Vicorder software
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in augumentation index
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of augumentation index after 4 weeks of treatment assessed by Vicorder software
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in augumentation pressure
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of augumentation pressure after 8 weeks of treatment assessed by Vicorder software
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in augumentation index
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of augumentation index after 8 weeks of treatment assessed by Vicorder software
8 weeks
Percent change from baseline and between groups in the estimated body water content
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Percent change of the body water content after 4 weeks of treatment, assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)
4 weeks
Percent change from baseline and between groups in the estimated body water content
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Percent change of the body water content after 8 weeks of treatment, assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)
8 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in estimated risk of cardiovascular disease
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Absolute change of the percent estimated risk of cardiovascular disease after 4 weeks of treatment
4 weeks
Absolute change from baseline and between groups in estimated risk of cardiovascular disease
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Absolute change of the percent estimated risk of cardiovascular disease after 8 weeks of treatment
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Arrigo F. Cicero, MD, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pre-HPT_RCT_2021

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on High-Normal Blood Pressure

Clinical Trials on Dietary Supplement

3
Subscribe