Enhancing Children's Cognitive Function and Achievement Through Carotenoid Consumption

The aim of this study is to test the casual relationship between carotenoid supplementation, cognitive function, and achievement over a school-year. The central hypothesis is that, relative to the waitlist placebo group, children receiving the carotenoid supplement will exhibit greater gains in cognitive function and achievement.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This clinical trial will be a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial to examine the effects of carotenoid supplementation on cognitive control, hippocampal-dependent relational memory, and academic achievement among pre-adolescents over one school year (i.e. 9-months).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

288

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Urbana, Illinois, United States, 61801
        • Recruiting
        • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child assent and parent/guardian consent
  • 8-10 years of age
  • No lutein supplementation within 6-months prior to enrollment (exception of multivitamins containing less than 1 mg lutein/day)
  • Absence of learning disability (parent-reported)
  • Tanner scale score ≤ 2
  • 20/20 or corrected vision

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-assent of child or non-consent of guardian
  • Above/below 8-10 years of age
  • Lutein supplementation within 6-months prior to enrollment (including multivitamins containing more than 1 mg lutein/day)
  • Identified learning disability (parent-reported)
  • Tanner scale score > 2
  • Not 20/20 or uncorrected vision

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Supplement
The active supplementation group participants will be asked to consume a daily carotenoid supplement for 9 months.
Carotenoid supplement comprised of 10mg lutein and 2mg zeaxanthin.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Control
The placebo control group participants will be asked to consume a placebo supplement for 9 months.
Placebo control supplement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Attentional Accuracy
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Changes in accuracy (%) between groups using a computerized flanker task.
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Attentional Reaction Time
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Changes in reaction time (ms) between groups using a computerized flanker task.
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Hippocampal-dependent Relational memory
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Spatial memory task accuracy
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Composite Academic Achievement
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Kaufman Test of Academic and Educational Achievement II (KTEA III) composite or comprehensive academic achievement score. The scores are standard scores with a minimum score of 40 and a maximum score of 160 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Macular Pigment Optical Density
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Changes in Macular Pigment Optical Density (log units) between groups using a macular densitometer.
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Attentional Resource Allocation
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Changes in P3 event related potential amplitude (microvolts) between groups using a computerized flanker task.
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Attentional Processing Speed
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Changes in P3 event related potential latency (ms) between groups using a computerized flanker task.
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Math
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Assessed as Mass subtest standard scores on the KTEA III. The scores are standard scores with a minimum score of 40 and a maximum score of 160 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Reading
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Assessed as Reading subtest standard scores on the KTEA III. The scores are standard scores with a minimum score of 40 and a maximum score of 160 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Written Language
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Assessed as Written Language subtest standard scores on the KTEA III. The scores are standard scores with a minimum score of 40 and a maximum score of 160 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Reading Fluency
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
Assessed as Reading Fluency subtest standard scores on the KTEA III. The scores are standard scores with a minimum score of 40 and a maximum score of 160 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Naiman Khan, PhD, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 31, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Change

Clinical Trials on Active supplement

3
Subscribe