- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05177679
Enhancing Children's Cognitive Function and Achievement Through Carotenoid Consumption
April 26, 2023 updated by: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
The aim of this study is to test the casual relationship between carotenoid supplementation, cognitive function, and achievement over a school-year.
The central hypothesis is that, relative to the waitlist placebo group, children receiving the carotenoid supplement will exhibit greater gains in cognitive function and achievement.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This clinical trial will be a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial to examine the effects of carotenoid supplementation on cognitive control, hippocampal-dependent relational memory, and academic achievement among pre-adolescents over one school year (i.e.
9-months).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
288
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Naiman Khan, PhD
- Phone Number: 217-300-2197
- Email: nakhan2@illinois.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Ginger Reeser, MS
- Phone Number: 217-244-8442
- Email: reeser2@illinois.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Urbana, Illinois, United States, 61801
- Recruiting
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
-
Contact:
- Naiman Khan, PhD
- Phone Number: 217-300-2197
- Email: nakhan2@illinois.edu
-
Contact:
- Ginger Reeser, MS
- Phone Number: 217-244-8442
- Email: reeser2@illinois.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
8 years to 10 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Child assent and parent/guardian consent
- 8-10 years of age
- No lutein supplementation within 6-months prior to enrollment (exception of multivitamins containing less than 1 mg lutein/day)
- Absence of learning disability (parent-reported)
- Tanner scale score ≤ 2
- 20/20 or corrected vision
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non-assent of child or non-consent of guardian
- Above/below 8-10 years of age
- Lutein supplementation within 6-months prior to enrollment (including multivitamins containing more than 1 mg lutein/day)
- Identified learning disability (parent-reported)
- Tanner scale score > 2
- Not 20/20 or uncorrected vision
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Active Supplement
The active supplementation group participants will be asked to consume a daily carotenoid supplement for 9 months.
|
Carotenoid supplement comprised of 10mg lutein and 2mg zeaxanthin.
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Control
The placebo control group participants will be asked to consume a placebo supplement for 9 months.
|
Placebo control supplement
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Attentional Accuracy
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Changes in accuracy (%) between groups using a computerized flanker task.
|
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Attentional Reaction Time
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Changes in reaction time (ms) between groups using a computerized flanker task.
|
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Hippocampal-dependent Relational memory
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Spatial memory task accuracy
|
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Composite Academic Achievement
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Kaufman Test of Academic and Educational Achievement II (KTEA III) composite or comprehensive academic achievement score.
The scores are standard scores with a minimum score of 40 and a maximum score of 160 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Macular Pigment Optical Density
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Changes in Macular Pigment Optical Density (log units) between groups using a macular densitometer.
|
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Attentional Resource Allocation
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Changes in P3 event related potential amplitude (microvolts) between groups using a computerized flanker task.
|
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Attentional Processing Speed
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Changes in P3 event related potential latency (ms) between groups using a computerized flanker task.
|
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Math
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Assessed as Mass subtest standard scores on the KTEA III.
The scores are standard scores with a minimum score of 40 and a maximum score of 160 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Reading
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Assessed as Reading subtest standard scores on the KTEA III.
The scores are standard scores with a minimum score of 40 and a maximum score of 160 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Written Language
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Assessed as Written Language subtest standard scores on the KTEA III.
The scores are standard scores with a minimum score of 40 and a maximum score of 160 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Reading Fluency
Time Frame: 9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Assessed as Reading Fluency subtest standard scores on the KTEA III.
The scores are standard scores with a minimum score of 40 and a maximum score of 160 where a higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
9 months (Baseline vs Follow-up)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Naiman Khan, PhD, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 23, 2022
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
May 31, 2025
Study Completion (Anticipated)
April 30, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 2, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 14, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
January 4, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 27, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 26, 2023
Last Verified
April 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 21066
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cognitive Change
-
University Ramon LlullAinhoa Nieto Guisado; Mònica Solana-TramuntUnknownCognitive Change | Proprioception Change | Balance ChangeSpain
-
Applied Science & Performance InstituteRecruitingCognitive Change | Mood Change | Mental ProcessesUnited States
-
National Council of Scientific and Technical Research...CompletedSleep | Cognitive Change | Mood Change | CreativityArgentina
-
Wake Forest UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Biruni UniversityCompletedCognitive ChangeTurkey
-
University of MemphisCalerie LLCCompletedCognitive ChangeUnited States
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityCompleted
-
University of MiamiUnited States Department of DefenseCompleted
-
Northumbria UniversityPerfetti van Melle SPACompletedCognitive ChangeUnited Kingdom
-
Universidad de GranadaCompleted
Clinical Trials on Active supplement
-
McMaster UniversityCompletedOverweight and Obesity | Men | WomenCanada
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterNutricia ResearchRecruitingPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveNetherlands
-
German Institute of Human NutritionGerman Center for Diabetes Research; Firma Rettenmeier & Söhne (Company)Unknown
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterDanone Research; The Netherlands Asthma FoundationCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive | Muscular AtrophyNetherlands
-
Pennington Biomedical Research CenterCompleted
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesWithdrawnMuscle Weakness | ICU-acquired WeaknessUnited States
-
Rush University Medical CenterNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)Completed
-
University of ZurichSwiss National Science Foundation; University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland; University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingFrailty | Sarcopenia | Fall | Malnutrition; ProteinSwitzerland