- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05190861
Evaluation of Droplet Digital PCR Rapid Detection Method and Precise Diagnosis and Treatment for Suspected Sepsis
July 8, 2025 updated by: Wen-hong Zhang, Huashan Hospital
Sepsis is a significant public health concern worldwide, with high morbidity and mortality.
With regard to a targeted antimicrobial treatment strategy, the earliest possible pathogen detection is of crucial importance.
Until now, culture-based detection methods represent the diagnostic gold standard, although they are characterized by numerous limitations.
Culture-independent molecular diagnostic procedures may represent a promising alternative.
In particular, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a novel one-step PCR assay that achieves higher accuracy and sensitivity in detecting causing pathogens in patients with bloodstream infections.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
1032
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Anhui
-
Hefei, Anhui, China, 230022
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
-
-
Hunan
-
Changsha, Hunan, China, 410013
- Xiangya Hospital Central South University
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210001
- Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine
-
Wuxi, Jiangsu, China, 214016
- Wuxi No.5 People's Hospital
-
-
Shanghai
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200233
- Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200092
- Xinhua Hospital Affliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
-
Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 201100
- Minhang Branch of Ruijin Hospital
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Rui'an, Zhejiang, China, 325200
- Zhejiang Rui'an People's Hospital
-
Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, 325000
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
1.18 years or older
2.Meet 2 of 4 sepsis criteria
- Temperature > 38C or < 36C
- Heart rate > 90 bpm
- Respiratory rate >20 or PaCO2 <32mmHg
WBC >12000/µL or < 4000/µL or > 10% bands
3.Hospitalized patients who have a diagnostic blood culture ordered as standard of care for suspected sepsis
4.Informed Consent by patient or legal representative.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to participate in the study or Failure to comply with treatment or follow-up time
- Known breastfeeding or pregnancy
- The researcher believes that there are any conditions (social or medical) that allow subjects to participate is unsafe. For example, severe anemia or high risk of bleeding,etc., which are not suitable for taking peripheral blood for testing
- Participating in other clinical studies
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: droplet digital PCR method
Pathogen detection by droplet digital PCR method as an adjunct to traditional microbiological assessments including blood culture
|
The droplet digital PCR method can detect nucleic acids from the most common pathogens (approximately 90%) responsible for BSIs according to Chinet2020 and takes about 4 hours to perform, reporting within the first 24h of suspected sepsis/septic shock.
|
|
Active Comparator: blood culture only
Pathogen detection by microbiological assessments including blood culture
|
Blood culture is a conventional microbiological method of pathogen detection.
Results from blood cultures are usually not available until 24 to 72 hours after sampling.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sensitivity
Time Frame: Up to 96 hours post blood collection
|
The primary endpoint of estimated sensitivity will be determined by comparing positive blood culture results with the concomitantly collected ddPCR results from the prospective clinical specimens.
|
Up to 96 hours post blood collection
|
|
Specificity
Time Frame: Up to 96 hours post blood collection
|
The primary endpoint of estimated specificity will be determined by comparing negative blood culture results with the concomitantly collected ddPCR results from the prospective clinical specimens.
|
Up to 96 hours post blood collection
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to the change to the targeted antimicrobial therapy
Time Frame: At time point of change to the targeted antimicrobial therapy, up to 96 hours post blood collection
|
At time point of change to the targeted antimicrobial therapy, up to 96 hours post blood collection
|
|
|
Number of patients with targeted antimicrobial therapy
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
|
|
Time to identification of a potential pathogen
Time Frame: At time point of identification of a potential pathogen, up to 96 hours post blood collection
|
At time point of identification of a potential pathogen, up to 96 hours post blood collection
|
|
|
Duration of antimicrobials
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
|
|
Change in condition severity
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
The sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA score), previously known as the sepsis-related organ failure assessment score, higher scores mean worse outcome.
|
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
|
Days in intensive care unit (ICU)
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
|
|
Ventilation duration in ICU (hours)
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
|
|
Days in hospital (from study inclusion)
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
|
|
All-cause death
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
|
|
Treatment costs
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
|
|
Quality of life of survivors after being discharged
Time Frame: Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
EQ-5D, a standardised measure of health-related quality of life developed by the EuroQol Group.The EQ-5D descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression.
The number of levels in these dimensions is 5 in the EQ-5D-5L.
Higher levels mean worse health states.
|
Up to the end of study participation, an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 29, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 29, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
December 29, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 12, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
January 13, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 11, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 8, 2025
Last Verified
January 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PROGRESS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sepsis
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingSepsis | Sepsis, Severe | Sepsis and Septic Shock | Sepsis at Intensive Care Unit | Sepsis, Septic Shock | Sepsis, Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock | Sepsis With Multiple Organ Dysfunction (MOD) | Sepsis With Acute Organ DysfunctionUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingSepsis Induced Myocardial Dysfunction | Sepsis Induced CardiomyopathyEgypt
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterUniversity of KansasRecruitingSepsis | Septic Shock | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, Severe | Sepsis Bacterial | Sepsis BacteremiaUnited States
-
Jip GroenInBiomeRecruitingMicrobial Colonization | Neonatal Infection | Neonatal Sepsis, Early-Onset | Microbial Disease | Clinical Sepsis | Culture Negative Neonatal Sepsis | Neonatal Sepsis, Late-Onset | Culture Positive Neonatal SepsisNetherlands
-
Karolinska InstitutetÖrebro University, SwedenCompletedSepsis | Sepsis Syndrome | Sepsis, SevereSweden
-
The University of QueenslandRoyal Brisbane and Women's HospitalUnknown
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedSepsis, Severe Sepsis and Septic ShockUnited States
-
Indonesia UniversityCompletedSevere Sepsis With Septic Shock | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockIndonesia
-
Rennes University HospitalUnknownSevere Sepsis or Septic Shock
-
Beckman Coulter, Inc.Biomedical Advanced Research and Development AuthorityEnrolling by invitationSevere Sepsis | Severe Sepsis Without Septic ShockUnited States
Clinical Trials on droplet digital PCR method
-
Zhejiang UniversityCompletedMeasurable Residual DiseaseChina
-
University of FloridaWithdrawnMyelodysplastic Syndromes | AML | Acute Leukemia | MDS
-
Shanghai East HospitalNot yet recruitingSepsis | Emergent Infections, Treatment
-
Fondazione Italiana Linfomi - ETSRecruiting
-
Peking University People's HospitalRecruitingAcute Leukemia | MDS | CML | MDS/MPNChina
-
University of LjubljanaCompleted
-
Hamad Medical CorporationRecruiting
-
University Hospital, BordeauxNot yet recruitingRetrospective Cohort of Patients Diagnosed With HCC on Non-Cirrhotic LiverFrance
-
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterCompletedCervical Cancer | Cervix LesionUnited States
-
Peking University People's HospitalRecruitingAcute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)China