Ultrasound-guided Monopolar Versus Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for Genicular Nerves in Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis

October 7, 2020 updated by: Mansoura University

Effect of Monopolar Radiofrequency Ablation for Genicular Nerves Compared to Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation Using Ultrasound in Treating Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis

Radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves using ultrasound is safe and effective for treating intractable knee osteoarthritis pain by using either monopolar or bipolar radiofrequency ablation.

This technique is based on anatomical studies demonstrating that genicular nerves are accompanied by genicular arteries. Ultrasound-guided RF genicular ablation yielded both significant reductions in knee pain and improvements in functional capacity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to compare between ultrasound guided monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency ablation in chronic knee osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis of knee joint is one of the most common disease conditions with advanced age and leads to considerable morbidity in terms of pain, stiffness, limitation in functions, disturbance in sleep and psychological disturbance

A diagnostic genicular nerve block (GNB) with local anesthetic is performed before RF genicular ablation, and a successful response to GNB is considered to indicate the need for RF genicular ablation

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • DK
      • Mansourah, DK, Egypt, 050
        • Recruiting
        • Mansoura University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sayed M Emam, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hanaa M Mohamad, MSec

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Radiologic tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-4).
  • Patients not responding to other treatments as physiotherapy, oral analgesics, and intraarticular injection with hyaluronic acids or steroids.
  • Patients refused surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Prior knee surgery.
  • Acute knee pain.
  • Intra-articular knee corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injection in the past 3 months.
  • Connective tissue diseases that affected the knee.
  • Anticoagulant medication use.
  • Local skin infection and sepsis at the site of intervention

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Monopolar radiofrequency ablation
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided monopolar radiofrequency ablation
a radiofrequency cannula is advanced under USG guidance towards the nerve. The final position will be confirmed by using nerve stimulator with elicitation of paraesthesia along the area of knee joint supplied by that respected genicular nerve by stimulation at 50 Hz current of <0.5 mV. The motor stimulation will be negative at all instances. For each genicular nerve, two conventional RF lesions are done for 120s at 80° of temperature using the Neurotherm 1100 RF generator.
Active Comparator: Bipolar radiofrequency ablation
Patients will receive ultrasound-guided bipolar radiofrequency ablation
Two radiofrequency cannula are advanced under USG guidance towards the nerve. The final position will be confirmed by using nerve stimulator with elicitation of paraesthesia by stimulation at 50 Hz current of <0.5 mV. The motor stimulation will be negative at all instances. For each genicular nerve, two conventional RF lesions are done for 120s at 80° of temperature using the Neurotherm 1100 RF generator.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Osteoarthritis pain
Time Frame: basal value, at 1, 4, 12, 24 weeks post procedure
The mean changes from baseline levels of osteoarthritis pain using visual analogue scale used to measure pain intensity. It is 10 cm scale where 0 cm represent no pain and 10 cm represent the worst pain ever
basal value, at 1, 4, 12, 24 weeks post procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oxford Knee Score
Time Frame: basal value, at 1, 4, 12, 24 weeks post procedure
A specific score to assess the functional changes in the knee using Oxford Knee Score (OKS). The scores are 12-item questionnaires ranging from 12-60, with 12 representing the optimal outcome.
basal value, at 1, 4, 12, 24 weeks post procedure
The procedure time
Time Frame: from the start of advancement of the cannula to end of procedure.
The procedure time taken by each mode of radiofrequency from the start of advancement of the cannula under US guidance to the end of the procedure.
from the start of advancement of the cannula to end of procedure.
Patient satisfaction score
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks post procedure
Patient satisfaction score with treatment which is scored from 1 to 10. A score of 1-4 was considered "dissatisfied," 5-8 was "satisfied," and 9 or 10 was "very satisfied
up to 24 weeks post procedure
Changes in doses of rescue analgesics
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks post procedure
up to 24 weeks post procedure
The incidence of numbness
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks post procedure
up to 24 weeks post procedure
The incidence of paresthesia
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks post procedure
up to 24 weeks post procedure
The incidence of motor weakness
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks post procedure
up to 24 weeks post procedure
the proportion of successful responders
Time Frame: up to 24 weeks post procedure
the proportion of successful responders with a reduction of at least 50% of median VAS score and no increase from baseline OKS
up to 24 weeks post procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Sherif A Mousa, MD, Professor of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MD.19.03.152

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

study protocol Statistical analysis plan Informed consent form

IPD Sharing Time Frame

data will be available at the end of study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

data access requests will be reviewed by an external independent review panel. Requestors will be required to sign a data access agreement

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Knee Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Monopolar radiofrequency ablation

3
Subscribe