- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05202444
The Use of Piezoelectric Surgery for Osteotomies
Evaluation of Using Piezoelectric Device Versus Conventional Saw for Osteotomy in Maxillary Orthognathic Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Minya, Egypt
- Faculty of Dentistry, Minia University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ranged from 18 to 35 years.
- Patients were not suffering from systemic diseases that compromise wound or bone healing.
- Patients indicated for leforte I or maxillary subapical osteotomy.
- Patients agree the informed consent .
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients suffering from systemic disease that may affect bleeding or bone healing
- Syndromicdentofacial deformity patients.
- Patients were subjected to previous maxillary orthognathic surgery.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Osteotomy using piezoelectrical device
|
osteotomy were utilized using piezoelectric from device (Woodpeker) with its internal irrigation system. We used US2 tip using the maximum bone cutting program and maximum irrigation program for lateral maxillary wall osteotomy and USIR tip for the posterior maxillary wall osteotomy. The pterygoid osteotome was placed between the tuberosity and pterygoid plates while the hamulus is palpated palatally with the index finger to guide the osteotome direction preventing palatal perforation.With the pterygoid osteotome still in position, we used a thin osteotome to complete the osteotomy of the posterior wall of the maxilla. |
|
Active Comparator: Osteotomy using surgical saw
|
osteotomy were utilized using piezoelectric from device (Woodpeker) with its internal irrigation system. We used US2 tip using the maximum bone cutting program and maximum irrigation program for lateral maxillary wall osteotomy and USIR tip for the posterior maxillary wall osteotomy. The pterygoid osteotome was placed between the tuberosity and pterygoid plates while the hamulus is palpated palatally with the index finger to guide the osteotome direction preventing palatal perforation.With the pterygoid osteotome still in position, we used a thin osteotome to complete the osteotomy of the posterior wall of the maxilla. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Intra-operative Bleeding
Time Frame: From begining of the surgery till the end
|
From begining of the surgery till the end
|
|
Osteotomy Time
Time Frame: From begining of the surgery till the end
|
From begining of the surgery till the end
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 281 (Other Identifier: Faculty of Pharmacy Ain Shams University)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.