The Effect of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion on Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Patients

December 9, 2019 updated by: Yonsei University
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a programmed intermittent bolus injection method compared to conventional continuous infusion in the management of epidural analgesia in pediatric patients correctional osteotomy. As a prospective double blinded randomized controlled trial, the investigators compare the quality of pain control after surgery.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03722
        • Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institue, Yonsei Universiy College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Pediatric patients with between 4 and 13 years
  • 2. Patients scheduled for correctional osteotomy of the lower extremity
  • 3. Pediatric patients whose weight of 40kg of less

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Contraindications to epidural analgesia (local infection, blood clotting disorder, anatomical abnormality, sepsis, etc.)
  • 2. Patients with symptoms/signs of elevated intracranial pressure with or without a history of elevated intracranial pressure
  • 3. If all of the parents of the subject are foreigners or illiterate (if the parents of the subject can not read the agreement)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PIEB (Programmed intermittent epidural bolus)
bolus administration of 0.15 ml of ropivacaine 0.15 ml / kg into epidural space every hour(intermittent bolus injection)
bolus administration of 0.15 ml of ropivacaine 0.15 ml / kg into epidural space every hour(intermittent bolus injection) using PCA device
Other Names:
  • PIEB
Active Comparator: CEI (Continuous epidural infusion)
Continuous infusion of 0.15% ropivacaine 0.15 ml / kg / h into the epidural space using PCA device
Continuous infusion of 0.15% ropivacaine 0.15 ml / kg / h into the epidural space using PCA device using PCA device
Other Names:
  • standard, CEI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in total amount of ropivacaine injected through epidural analgesia
Time Frame: 6 hours after surgery
The difference in the amount of ropivacaine injected into epidural space for 6 hours postoperatively
6 hours after surgery
Difference in total amount of ropivacaine injected through epidural analgesia
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
The difference in the amount of ropivacaine injected into epidural space for 12 hours postoperatively
12 hours after surgery
Difference in total amount of ropivacaine injected through epidural analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
The difference in the amount of ropivacaine injected into epidural space for 24 hours postoperatively
24 hours after surgery
Difference in total amount of ropivacaine injected through epidural analgesia
Time Frame: 36 hours after surgery
The difference in the amount of ropivacaine injected into epidural space for 36 hours postoperatively
36 hours after surgery
Difference in total amount of ropivacaine injected through epidural analgesia
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
The difference in the amount of ropivacaine injected into epidural space for 48 hours postoperatively
48 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The time for the first patient controlled rescue epidural bolus after surgery
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
48 hours after surgery
Number of patient-controlled rescue epidural bolus for 48 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
48 hours after surgery
Pain scores for 6 hours after surgery (VAS)
Time Frame: 6 hours after surgery
VAS(visual analogue scale) :0(no paine)~10(wort possible, unbearable, excruciating apin)
6 hours after surgery
Pain scores for 12 hours after surgery (VAS)
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
VAS(visual analogue scale) :0(no paine)~10(wort possible, unbearable, excruciating apin)
12 hours after surgery
Pain scores for 24 hours after surgery (VAS)
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
VAS(visual analogue scale) :0(no paine)~10(wort possible, unbearable, excruciating apin)
24 hours after surgery
Pain scores for 48 hours after surgery (VAS)
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
VAS(visual analogue scale) :0(no paine)~10(wort possible, unbearable, excruciating apin)
48 hours after surgery
Pain scores for 6 hours after surgery (r-FLACC)
Time Frame: 6 hours after surgery
r-FLACC scale (revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale): summation of each items and total range is 0~10. higher values represent a more severe pain.
6 hours after surgery
Pain scores for 12 hours after surgery (r-FLACC)
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
r-FLACC scale (revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale): summation of each items and total range is 0~10. higher values represent a more severe pain.
12 hours after surgery
Pain scores for 24 hours after surgery (r-FLACC)
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
r-FLACC scale (revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale): summation of each items and total range is 0~10. higher values represent a more severe pain.
24 hours after surgery
Pain scores for 48 hours after surgery (r-FLACC)
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
r-FLACC scale (revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale): summation of each items and total range is 0~10. higher values represent a more severe pain.
48 hours after surgery
Whether to administer additional intravenous narcotic analgesics with total additional intravenous analgesic dose.
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery

-% of patients with given intravenous additional narcotic analgesics

  • number of administrating intravenous additional narcotic analgesics per patient
48 hours after surgery
Whether to administer additional intravenous narcotic analgesics with total additional intravenous analgesic dose.
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery

-% of patients with given intravenous additional narcotic analgesics

  • total additional dose of intravenous narcotic analgesics per patient
48 hours after surgery
Whether to administer additional intravenous narcotic analgesics with total additional intravenous analgesic dose.
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery

-% of patients with given intravenous additional narcotic analgesics

  • measurement tool: Electronic Medical Record(including Drug administration history)
48 hours after surgery
A dull feeling the patient feels
Time Frame: 6 hours after surgery
A dull feeling the patient feels : yes or no
6 hours after surgery
A dull feeling the patient feels
Time Frame: 12 hours after surgery
A dull feeling the patient feels : yes or no
12 hours after surgery
A dull feeling the patient feels
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
A dull feeling the patient feels : yes or no
24 hours after surgery
A dull feeling the patient feels
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
A dull feeling the patient feels : yes or no
48 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 4-2019-0418

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Correctional Osteotomy

Clinical Trials on Programmed intermittent epidural bolus

Subscribe