Shark Screw® - Hand- and Foot Surgery Study

September 27, 2019 updated by: Klinik Diakonissen Linz GmbH

Retrospective Study on the Use of a Human Bone Graft (Shark Screw®) in Hand- and Foot Surgery

This observational study aims to determine the efficacy and safety of the Shark Screw® transplant for osteotomy and arthrodesis in hand and foot surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The Shark Screw® transplant (surgebright GmbH) is a human cortical bone allograft for osteosynthesis and can replace metal or bioabsorbable devices in various procedures. In total, the clinical records from 32 patients who had undergone surgical procedure at the hand or foot between October 2016 and January 2018 with the use of a Shark Screw® transplant for joint arthrodesis or for the stabilization of osteotomies serve as data sources for this study. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Shark Screw® transplant in hand and foot surgery by analyzing the recovery, wound and bone healing process.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Linz, Austria, 4020
        • Klinik Diakonissen Linz GmbH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

patients who underwent hand- or foot surgery with the application of a Shark Screw® transplant

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Application of the human bone graft Shark Screw® in a Hand- or Foot surgical procedure between October 2016 and January 2018
  • Data from at least 1 follow-up examination after surgery around the 6th post-operative week or other information about the health status of the patient in the first 6 post-operative weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not enough data for an objective analysis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Osseous consolidation of the transplant
Time Frame: 1 year
Absence of radiolucent lines around the transplant in the x-ray
1 year
Evaluation pre- and postoperative pain (VAS)
Time Frame: 1 year
The visual analogue scale (VAS) is a vertical line, 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extremes (0mm = no pain - 100mm = worst imaginable pain). A higher score indicates more pain.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of postoperative complication and soft tissue irritation
Time Frame: 1 year
Did wound healing disorder or soft tissue irritation occur?
1 year
Incidence of surgical revision
Time Frame: 1 year
Was a surgical revision done postoperatively?
1 year
Incidence of postoperative pseudarthrosis
Time Frame: 1 year
Based on x-rays or MRI: Is a postoperative pseudarthrosis visible?
1 year
Duration of post-operative analgesic medication
Time Frame: 1 year
How long did the patient take analgesics after surgery?
1 year
Cellular contact to the recipient bone
Time Frame: 1 year
Absence of sclerosis around the transplant in the x-ray
1 year
Resorptive processes in the recipient bone
Time Frame: 1 year
Absence of cystic lucency in the x-ray
1 year
Incidence of cracking or loosening of the screw
Time Frame: 1 year
Based on x-rays: Is a loosening or cracking of the screw visible?
1 year
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 year
Patient satisfaction was classified as "very satisfied", "satisfied" and "not satisfied"
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Klaus Pastl, Dr. med., Klinik Diakonissen Linz

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 27, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 7, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 7, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1099/2018

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arthrodesis

Clinical Trials on Shark Screw® transplant

Subscribe