Mindfulness-based Emotional Regulation Versus ACT in Anxiety (MER-ACT)

January 24, 2022 updated by: Dr. Eduardo Fernández-Jiménez, Hospital Universitario La Paz

A Randomized Single-blind Trial in Adult Population With Anxiety Disorders: Comparison of a Mindfulness-based Emotional Regulation Program Versus an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based Intervention

Background: There is a paucity of randomized clinical trials which address the relationship between training in mindfulness and neuropsychological outcomes. Also, how psychotherapeutic interventions were delivered before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and its possible differential results need more scientific attention.

Aims: To compare the effectiveness of an intervention based on the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) versus a Mindfulness-based Emotional Regulation (MER) intervention among adult patients with anxiety disorders.

Methods: This randomized, single-blind, clinical trial is being conducted in a community Mental Health Unit (Colmenar Viejo, Madrid) in Spain. Potential outpatients will be over 18 years (until 75 years) with some type of specific or unspecified anxiety disorder. They will be assessed for inclusion/exclusion criteria and randomized according to the score on the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (used as a blocking factor). One of the interventions was adapted from the Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for anxiety disorders and MER was based on the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program. Each intervention has been designed to be weekly, during 8 weeks, guided by two Clinical Psychology residents. Interventions have been delivered face-to-face before the COVID-19 pandemic, or via online currently. A 2x3 mixed-factorial ANOVA (intervention type x pre-treatment, post-treatment and 6-month follow-up) will be conducted, with Sidak-correction post hoc tests. The primary measures are the TMT score (A and B forms), Stroop test, Digit span subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, version IV (Forward, Backward and Sequencing subtests), Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II, and Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3). Secondary measures are the Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), Toronto Alexithymia Scale 20-item (TAS-20), Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-8), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the World Health Organization's Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF). Norms based on the Spanish general population will be used.

Results: This clinical trial started in February 2019 and it is expected to end in September 2023. The minimum sample size required is 128 participants (64 each intervention) to achieve medium effect sizes on primary outcomes (alfa = .05 and beta = .20). So far, 107 adult patients with anxiety disorders participated (64 participants in face-to-face interventions before the COVID-19 pandemic; and 43 participants via online, during the pandemic).

Conclusions: This is the first study to compare two mindfulness-based interventions on several neurocognitive functions and other psychological domains among adult patients with anxiety disorders.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

128

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Colmenar Viejo, Madrid, Spain, 28770
        • Recruiting
        • Centro de Salud Mental de Colmenar Viejo Sur
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tamara Castellanos-Villaverde, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Itxaso Torrea-Araiz, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gloria Navarro-Oliver, MSc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Spanish as mother tongue or a very high level in Spanish to understand the patient information sheet, the informed consent, as well as being able to follow the group intervention sessions and the homework.
  • Diagnosis of an anxiety disorder, avoidant personality disorder, adjustment disorders with anxious/anxious-depressive symptomatology, as well as unspecified anxiety disorders.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Continuing individual psychotherapeutic treatment from the beginning of the group intervention until the end of it.
  • Other diagnoses of severe mental disorder; cluster A or B personality disorders; and/or substance use disorder in the past 6 months.
  • Diagnosis of intellectual disability, mild cognitive impairment or dementia.
  • Changes in psychopharmacological treatment (in active ingredient or doses) in the month before each intervention.
  • Diagnosis of uncontrolled or non-stabilized organic disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
Intervention based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy that promotes the acceptance and defusion of unwanted internal experiences and commitment to values of the personal life project.
This intervention uses techniques based on mindfulness, metaphors and exposition exercises both in imagination and in real contexts.
Experimental: Mindfulness-based Emotional Regulation (MER)
Intervention inspired in the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program that fosters the development of a behavioral pattern made up of conscious responses in order to decrease reactivity to stressors.
This intervention includes both formal practices of body scan meditation, standing / sitting Hatha yoga, meditations focused on the breath or other objects of attention, exercises of benevolence or kindness with affection (loving-kindness); as well as informal mindfulness practices in activities of daily living.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trail Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: Baseline
It evaluates selective/alternative visual attention by the time of execution (seconds)
Baseline
Trail Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: 2 months
It evaluates selective/alternative visual attention by the time of execution (seconds)
2 months
Trail Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: 8 months
It evaluates selective/alternative visual attention by the time of execution (seconds)
8 months
Stroop Color-Word Interference Test
Time Frame: Baseline
It measures processing speed and visual inhibitory control by the total number of items achieved
Baseline
Stroop Color-Word Interference Test
Time Frame: 2 months
It measures processing speed and visual inhibitory control by the total number of items achieved
2 months
Stroop Color-Word Interference Test
Time Frame: 8 months
It measures processing speed and visual inhibitory control by the total number of items achieved
8 months
Digit span subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, version IV (WAIS-IV): Forward, Backward and Sequencing subtests
Time Frame: Baseline
It evaluates span of immediate recall and verbal working memory by the total number of items achieved and the maximum number of remembered elements
Baseline
Digit span subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, version IV (WAIS-IV): Forward, Backward and Sequencing subtests
Time Frame: 2 months
It evaluates span of immediate recall and verbal working memory by the total number of items achieved and the maximum number of remembered elements
2 months
Digit span subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, version IV (WAIS-IV): Forward, Backward and Sequencing subtests
Time Frame: 8 months
It evaluates span of immediate recall and verbal working memory by the total number of items achieved and the maximum number of remembered elements
8 months
The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II)
Time Frame: Baseline
It evaluates experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility. It is a 7-item self-report instrument, rated on a 7-point Likert scale, with a total scale score ranging from 7 to 49. Higher scores indicate higher levels of experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility
Baseline
The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II)
Time Frame: 2 months
It evaluates experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility. It is a 7-item self-report instrument, rated on a 7-point Likert scale, with a total scale score ranging from 7 to 49. Higher scores indicate higher levels of experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility
2 months
The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II)
Time Frame: 8 months
It evaluates experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility. It is a 7-item self-report instrument, rated on a 7-point Likert scale, with a total scale score ranging from 7 to 49. Higher scores indicate higher levels of experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility
8 months
The Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3)
Time Frame: Baseline
It measures concerns associated with possible negative consequences of anxiety-related symptoms in three dimensions (physical, cognitive and social). It is an 18-item self-report, rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with a total scale score (ranging from 0 to 72) and three 6-item subscales (Physical, Cognitive and Social Concerns, ranging from 0 to 24 points each). Higher scores indicate higher anxiety sensitivity
Baseline
The Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3)
Time Frame: 2 months
It measures concerns associated with possible negative consequences of anxiety-related symptoms in three dimensions (physical, cognitive and social). It is an 18-item self-report, rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with a total scale score (ranging from 0 to 72) and three 6-item subscales (Physical, Cognitive and Social Concerns, ranging from 0 to 24 points each). Higher scores indicate higher anxiety sensitivity
2 months
The Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3)
Time Frame: 8 months
It measures concerns associated with possible negative consequences of anxiety-related symptoms in three dimensions (physical, cognitive and social). It is an 18-item self-report, rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with a total scale score (ranging from 0 to 72) and three 6-item subscales (Physical, Cognitive and Social Concerns, ranging from 0 to 24 points each). Higher scores indicate higher anxiety sensitivity
8 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)
Time Frame: Baseline
It is a self-report instrument of 39 items, rated on a 5-point Likert scale, that are grouped into both a total scale score (with a mean score ranging from 1 to 5) and five specific subscales: Observing (8 items), Describing (8 items), Acting with awareness (8 items), Non-judgment (8 items), and Non-reactivity (7 items). Higher values indicate higher levels in each domain
Baseline
The Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)
Time Frame: 2 months
It is a self-report instrument of 39 items, rated on a 5-point Likert scale, that are grouped into both a total scale score (with a mean score ranging from 1 to 5) and five specific subscales: Observing (8 items), Describing (8 items), Acting with awareness (8 items), Non-judgment (8 items), and Non-reactivity (7 items). Higher values indicate higher levels in each domain
2 months
The Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ)
Time Frame: 8 months
It is a self-report instrument of 39 items, rated on a 5-point Likert scale, that are grouped into both a total scale score (with a mean score ranging from 1 to 5) and five specific subscales: Observing (8 items), Describing (8 items), Acting with awareness (8 items), Non-judgment (8 items), and Non-reactivity (7 items). Higher values indicate higher levels in each domain
8 months
The Toronto Alexithymia Scale 20-item (TAS-20)
Time Frame: Baseline
It is a self-report instrument that measures both a global factor of alexithymia, and three specific domains: Difficulty in Identifying Feelings (7 items), Difficulty in Describing Feelings (5 items) and Externally Oriented Thinking (8 items). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The total scale score ranges between 20 and 100, with higher scores indicating greater level of alexithymia
Baseline
The Toronto Alexithymia Scale 20-item (TAS-20)
Time Frame: 2 months
It is a self-report instrument that measures both a global factor of alexithymia, and three specific domains: Difficulty in Identifying Feelings (7 items), Difficulty in Describing Feelings (5 items) and Externally Oriented Thinking (8 items). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The total scale score ranges between 20 and 100, with higher scores indicating greater level of alexithymia
2 months
The Toronto Alexithymia Scale 20-item (TAS-20)
Time Frame: 8 months
It is a self-report instrument that measures both a global factor of alexithymia, and three specific domains: Difficulty in Identifying Feelings (7 items), Difficulty in Describing Feelings (5 items) and Externally Oriented Thinking (8 items). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The total scale score ranges between 20 and 100, with higher scores indicating greater level of alexithymia
8 months
The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-8)
Time Frame: Baseline
It is an 8-item self-report instrument, rated on a 7-point Likert scale, that assesses the degree of certainty or uncertainty about their own or someone else's mental states. It includes two subscales (with a double-scoring procedure): Uncertainty about mental states (5 items, with range 0-3) and Certainty about mental states (6 items, with range 0-2). High levels of certainty about mental states indicate hypermentalizing and high levels of uncertainty indicate hypomentalizing
Baseline
The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-8)
Time Frame: 2 months
It is an 8-item self-report instrument, rated on a 7-point Likert scale, that assesses the degree of certainty or uncertainty about their own or someone else's mental states. It includes two subscales (with a double-scoring procedure): Uncertainty about mental states (5 items, with range 0-3) and Certainty about mental states (6 items, with range 0-2). High levels of certainty about mental states indicate hypermentalizing and high levels of uncertainty indicate hypomentalizing
2 months
The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ-8)
Time Frame: 8 months
It is an 8-item self-report instrument, rated on a 7-point Likert scale, that assesses the degree of certainty or uncertainty about their own or someone else's mental states. It includes two subscales (with a double-scoring procedure): Uncertainty about mental states (5 items, with range 0-3) and Certainty about mental states (6 items, with range 0-2). High levels of certainty about mental states indicate hypermentalizing and high levels of uncertainty indicate hypomentalizing
8 months
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Baseline
It measures anxious and depressive symptomatology. It is a 14-item self-report, rated on a 4-point Likert scale, with a total score (ranging from 0 to 42) and two subscales (7 items each, ranging from 0-21)
Baseline
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: 2 months
It measures anxious and depressive symptomatology. It is a 14-item self-report, rated on a 4-point Likert scale, with a total score (ranging from 0 to 42) and two subscales (7 items each, ranging from 0-21)
2 months
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: 8 months
It measures anxious and depressive symptomatology. It is a 14-item self-report, rated on a 4-point Likert scale, with a total score (ranging from 0 to 42) and two subscales (7 items each, ranging from 0-21)
8 months
The World Health Organization's Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: Baseline
It is a self-report instrument of 26 items grouped into general health questions (2 items) and four factors: Physical Health (7 items), Psychological Health (6 items), Social Relations (3 items) and Environment (8 items), ranging from 0 to 100 points. Higher scores in each domain indicate higher level of satisfaction
Baseline
The World Health Organization's Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: 2 months
It is a self-report instrument of 26 items grouped into general health questions (2 items) and four factors: Physical Health (7 items), Psychological Health (6 items), Social Relations (3 items) and Environment (8 items), ranging from 0 to 100 points. Higher scores in each domain indicate higher level of satisfaction
2 months
The World Health Organization's Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: 8 months
It is a self-report instrument of 26 items grouped into general health questions (2 items) and four factors: Physical Health (7 items), Psychological Health (6 items), Social Relations (3 items) and Environment (8 items), ranging from 0 to 100 points. Higher scores in each domain indicate higher level of satisfaction
8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eduardo Fernández-Jiménez, PhD, Hospital Universitario La Paz

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 18, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

Subscribe