Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Assessment Strategy Through a Novel Gait Analysis Tool for Post-stroke Spasticity

February 15, 2023 updated by: Emanuela Elena Mihai, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Assessment Strategy Through a Novel Gait Analysis Tool for Post-stroke Spasticity During COVID-19 Pandemic

The aim of this study is to objectively evaluate the effectiveness of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) and conventional physical therapy program on the gait pattern through a new gait analysis system which encompasses spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters and to correlate the findings with the clinical evaluation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this observational study was to objectively evaluate the effects of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy and conventional physical therapy program on the gait pattern, spatiotemporal variables (step length, step cycle time, stance foot flexion-extension, foot stance pronation-supination, and foot swing flexion-extension), and kinematic parameters (trunk flexion-extension, trunk lateral flexion, hip flexion-extension, knee flexion-extension, ankle flexion-extension) through a new gait analysis system and correlate the findings with clinical outcomes such as Modified Ashworth scale (MAS), passive range of motion (PROM), Clonus score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Tinetti Assessment Tool, Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC).

The gait pattern of post-stroke patients before and after rESWT delivery and conventional rehabilitation program will be assessed clinically and also through an instrumented treadmill (Walker View) in terms of spatiotemporal and kinematic gait parameters.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bucharest, Romania
        • Elias University Emergency Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Inpatients from the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Department stating the eligibility criteria

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • suffered from a hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke and they were in the subacute or chronic phase;
  • had no history of previous stroke;
  • had lower limb post- stroke spasticity and spasticity grade ≥1 on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS);
  • pain intensity measured on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ≥1;
  • ability to stand and walk unassisted for at least 30 seconds;
  • adult patients (>18 years old).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other neurological, musculoskeletal, orthopaedic, or cardiovascular conditions; -- severe cognitive impairment, severe aphasia or inability to understand or execute instructions;
  • changes in antispastic medication and dose or changes in the analgesic medication;
  • myopathy;
  • severe spasticity grade;
  • visual field disorders or hemineglect;
  • anticoagulants or any contraindication to receive radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), or any contraindication to receive physical therapy sessions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Study group
The patients considered eligible will form the study group and will start the conventional physical therapy program and radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy delivery (rESWT).

The conventional physical therapy program will consist of verticalization strategies, range of motion exercises, muscle stretching and strengthening exercises, stance and balance training, core stability exercises, gait training, functional training, cryotherapy or local heat for 1h/day, 5 days/week for 2 weeks.

Regarding the rESWT delivery, 2000 shots will be applied on the triceps surae myotendinous junction with a frequency of 10 Hz and an energy density of 60 mJ, 7 min/session, 1 session/week for 2 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spasticity grade change
Time Frame: Change from baseline Modified Ashworth Scale at 14 days
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS); ranges from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 5 (rigid limb in flexion or extension). The lower the score, the lower spasticity grade, thus a better outcome.
Change from baseline Modified Ashworth Scale at 14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ankle passive range of motion change
Time Frame: Change from baseline Passive Range of Motion at 14 days
Passive range of motion (PROM); flexion 0-30 degrees, extension 0-50 degrees, pronation 0-30 degrees, supination 0-60 degrees. Higher scores define augmented, better range of motion.
Change from baseline Passive Range of Motion at 14 days
Pain intensity change
Time Frame: Change from baseline Visual Analogue Scale at 14 days
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); the greater the value on the 0.1 meters line, the greater the pain intensity starting from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (the highest pain intensity ever experienced).
Change from baseline Visual Analogue Scale at 14 days
Step length change
Time Frame: Change from baseline step length at 14 days
Step length (meters); ranges from 0-0.5 meters, the higher the step length leads to better outcome.
Change from baseline step length at 14 days
Knee flexion-extension change
Time Frame: Change from baseline knee flexion-extension at 14 days
Knee flexion-extension; Maximum and minimum angle value in the sagittal plane of knee, from 0 degrees in full extension to 140-150 degrees in maximum flexion.
Change from baseline knee flexion-extension at 14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mihai Berteanu, Elias University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spasticity, Muscle

Clinical Trials on Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy and conventional physical therapy

Subscribe