Hysterosalpingo-Foam Ultrasonography Combined With Power Doppler, Compared With Laparoscopy in Tubal Patency Assessment in Cases of Infertility

January 13, 2022 updated by: Ahmed M Maged, MD, Cairo University

Hysterosalpingo-Foam Ultrasonography Combined With Power Doppler, Compared With Laparoscopy in Tubal Patency Assessment in Cases of Infertility, (a Cross-sectional Study).

Women presenting with primary or secondary infertility and are undergoing investigation of tubal patency assessment will be subjected to:

  • The examination is performed between days 5 and 10 of the menstrual cycle.
  • Routine antibiotic prophylaxis using oral Azithromycin the day before and routine administration of NSAID rectal suppository one hour before the procedure
  • Initially, real-time 2D +/- 3D vaginal ultrasound assessment of the pelvis
  • The cervix is to be visualized with a Cusco speculum and to be cleaned with an antiseptic then A No. 5 pediatric Foley catheter will be introduced into the cervical os, using a tenaculum if necessary. The balloon is to be positioned in the lower uterine cavity and to be inflated with 2 ml of saline to prevent backflow of contrast medium through the cervix then the speculum will be removed and the vaginal transducer is going to be reintroduced in the longitudinal plane to confirm correct placement of the catheter.
  • Initial 3-5 ml of foam contrast is to be introduced slowly into the endometrial cavity while the flow of contrast medium in each tube is evaluated using grayscale and power Doppler imaging
  • Power Doppler is very helpful to confirm the direction of the flow as well as the acceleration during injection.
  • Tubal patency and quality of visualization are classified according the following parameters:

    1. Flow over the whole length of the tube, fimbrial outflow or peritoneal spillage of contrast provided definite evidence of complete (i.e. proximal and distal) tubal patency.
    2. Paracornual flow only without visualization of fimbrial outflow or peritoneal spillage suggests at least proximal patency.
    3. Contrast filling of the endometrial cavity without cornual flow suggests possible tubal occlusion.
    4. Technical difficulty making tubal evaluation impossible
  • Standard laparoscopic evaluation with the dye test (methylene blue staining) is to be performed 1 day after ultrasound tests with 1 day of hospitalization under general anesthesia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Women in the reproductive age group between 20 and 40 years old presenting with primary or secondary infertility ( either unexplained or suspected tubal factor by history taking ) and are undergoing investigation of tubal patency assessment

Each patient in this study will be subjected to:

  • The examination is performed between days 5 and 10 of the menstrual cycle, the patient in gynecological position, preferably with the aid of one assistant.
  • Routine antibiotic prophylaxis using oral Azithromycin the day before and routine administration of NSAID rectal suppository one hour before the procedure
  • Initially, real-time 2D +/- 3D vaginal ultrasound assessment of the pelvic organs is to be performed using Samsung Elite with endovaginal probe of frequency 6-12 MHz
  • The cervix is to be visualized with a Cussco speculum and to be cleaned with an antiseptic then A No. 5 pediatric Foley catheter will be introduced into the cervical os, using a tenaculum if necessary. The balloon is to be positioned in the lower uterine cavity and to be inflated with 2 ml of saline to prevent backflow of contrast medium through the cervix then the speculum will be removed and the vaginal transducer is going to be reintroduced in the longitudinal plane to confirm correct placement of the catheter.
  • The foam contrast agent is created by combining 3-4mL of 2% lidocaine gel 12-13mL of saline and 3mL air.
  • The assistant creates the foam immediately before application, moving the mixture between two connected 20-mL syringes, until a whitish suspension is obtained (approximately 10-20 times).
  • Initial 3-5 ml of foam contrast is to be introduced slowly into the endometrial cavity while the flow of contrast medium in each tube is evaluated using grayscale and power Doppler imaging
  • Power Doppler is very helpful to confirm the direction of the flow as well as the acceleration during injection.
  • Acquisition without Doppler usually takes less than 5 s, while acquisition with power Doppler is longer(approximately 10 s)
  • After dataset acquisition, Images will be stored as 2D still images, 2D clips +/- 3D volumes. the patient is to be discharged and final diagnosis is made based on the real-time observations and, if available, offline analyses of acquired datasets.
  • Tubal patency and quality of visualization are classified according the following parameters:

    1. Flow over the whole length of the tube, fimbrial outflow or peritoneal spillage of contrast provided definite evidence of complete (i.e. proximal and distal) tubal patency.
    2. Paracornual flow only without visualization of fimbrial outflow or peritoneal spillage suggests at least proximal patency.
    3. Contrast filling of the endometrial cavity without cornual flow suggests possible tubal occlusion.
    4. Technical difficulty making tubal evaluation impossible e.g. absent filling of the endometrial cavity due to backflow of contrast, inability to introduce the catheter into the cervical os or maintain the catheter in the correct position preventing instillation of contrast into the endometrial cavity.
  • Standard laparoscopic evaluation with the dye test (methylene blue staining) is to be performed 1 day after ultrasound tests with 1 day of hospitalization under general anesthesia.
  • The raters are to be blinded to the results of the ultrasound examination until endoscopic diagnosis is to be performed
  • Comparison between the results of the above mentioned techniques will be done and statistical analysis of the results will be carried out

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

119

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 12151
        • Kasr Alainy Medical School

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 40 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Sexually active women in the reproductive age group between 20 and 40 years

  • History of primary or secondary infertility ( either unexplained or suspected tubal factor by history taking )
  • Tubal factor has not been investigated before or has been investigated with inconclusive results

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age less than 20 or above 40 years.
  • Using contraception.
  • Undiagnosed pregnancy.
  • known allergy to lidocaine.
  • active pelvic inflammatory disease or genital tract bleeding.
  • Patent both tubes as assessed previously ( no need for exposure to further Investigation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Hysterosalpingo-Foam Ultrasonography
3-5 ml of foam contrast is to be introduced slowly into the endometrial cavity while the flow of contrast medium in each tube is evaluated using grayscale and power Doppler imaging
  • Initial 3-5 ml of foam contrast is to be introduced slowly into the endometrial cavity while the flow of contrast medium in each tube is evaluated using grayscale and power Doppler imaging
  • Power Doppler is very helpful to confirm the direction of the flow as well as the acceleration during injection
• Standard laparoscopic evaluation with the dye test (methylene blue staining) is to be performed 1 day after ultrasound tests with 1 day of hospitalization under general anesthesia
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: laparoscopy
• Standard laparoscopic evaluation with the dye test (methylene blue staining) is to be performed 1 day after ultrasound tests with 1 day of hospitalization under general anesthesia
  • Initial 3-5 ml of foam contrast is to be introduced slowly into the endometrial cavity while the flow of contrast medium in each tube is evaluated using grayscale and power Doppler imaging
  • Power Doppler is very helpful to confirm the direction of the flow as well as the acceleration during injection
• Standard laparoscopic evaluation with the dye test (methylene blue staining) is to be performed 1 day after ultrasound tests with 1 day of hospitalization under general anesthesia

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tubal patency
Time Frame: During the ultrasound
To evaluate the accuracy of Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography combined with Power Doppler in assessment of tubal patency in infertile women
During the ultrasound

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 9, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 17, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 3, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 63

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infertility of Tubal Origin

Clinical Trials on Hysterosalpingo-Foam Ultrasonography

Subscribe