- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05218447
Dosing of Overground Robotic Gait Training with Functional Outcomes and Neuroplasticity After Spinal Cord Injury (DOOR SCI)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Emerging evidence indicates that robotic exoskeleton use results in positive outcomes for those with chronic SCI, yet limited evidence exists for the acute setting. The potential benefit of RGT initiated during inpatient rehabilitation when recovery is greatest is unknown yet appears promising due to established principles of neuroplasticity and the fact that RGT incorporates the critical components of gait training. As a result of the lack of evidence, no clinical practice guidelines exist that delineate which gait retraining approach or dose during early phases of recovery results in the best outcomes for people with motor incomplete SCI. The DOOR SCI project examines dosing effects on 5 occasions over 9 months: (1) inpatient rehabilitation admission and (2) discharge, (3) after completing 24 RGT sessions, (4) 1-month post RGT, and (5) 9-months post SCI). To test the overarching goal, investigators propose three specific aims:
Aim 1: Using a randomized controlled trial, prospectively examine whether the dosing frequency [24 sessions delivered as high, moderate, or low frequency, defined by number days/week (4, 3, or 2 days/week over 6, 8, 12 weeks)] of RGT therapy provided during the acute/subacute recovery phase after motor incomplete SCI impacts outcomes compared to usual care only.
Aim 2: Investigate the difference over 9 months of the neuroplastic effect of RGT dosing as measured by single pulse TMS.
Aim 3: Evaluate the safety, tolerability, and feasibility of delivering different dosing frequencies of RGT from inpatient to outpatient rehabilitation settings.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Christa Ochoa, MPH
- Email: Christa.Ochoa@BSWHealth.org
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Faith Meza, MPH
- Phone Number: 469-531-1577
- Email: Faith.Meza@BSWHealth.org
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
- Recruiting
- Baylor Scott & White Institute for Rehabilitation
-
Contact:
- Baylor Scott & White Institute for Rehabilitation
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All types of motor incomplete SCI (traumatic and non-traumatic)
- Acute/Subacute phase of recovery
- Medically stable as deemed by physician
- Undergoing medical care and rehabilitation at Baylor Scott & White Institute for Rehabilitation
- Both genders and all races and ethnicities
- Meet the Ekso robotic exoskeleton frame limitations
- Continence of or a program for bladder and bowel management
Exclusion Criteria:
- Concurrent moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI)
- Degenerative diagnoses
- Pre-morbid developmental disability, significant psychological diagnosis, or other cognitive impairment
- Pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Low Frequency
Subjects will receive 2 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 12 weeks
|
Subjects will be randomized to one of 4 gait training group. The duration of treatment will span across their inpatient rehabilitation length of stay after providing informed consent to their 9 months post-SCI visit in the outpatient rehabilitation setting. Subjects will wear an exoskeleton device and receive robotic gait training (RGT) with a physical therapist during a 45-minutes inpatient rehabilitation session. Subjects will complete 24 robotic gait training sessions over different durations during outpatient rehabilitation. Subjects will also complete a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment and questionnaires about walking and function. Subjects will be asked to wear an activity monitor to measure their activity.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Moderate Frequency
Subjects will receive 3 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 8 weeks
|
Subjects will be randomized to one of 4 gait training group. The duration of treatment will span across their inpatient rehabilitation length of stay after providing informed consent to their 9 months post-SCI visit in the outpatient rehabilitation setting. Subjects will wear an exoskeleton device and receive robotic gait training (RGT) with a physical therapist during a 45-minutes inpatient rehabilitation session. Subjects will complete 24 robotic gait training sessions over different durations during outpatient rehabilitation. Subjects will also complete a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment and questionnaires about walking and function. Subjects will be asked to wear an activity monitor to measure their activity.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: High Frequency
Subjects will receive 4 sessions of robotic gait training (RGT) per week for 6 weeks
|
Subjects will be randomized to one of 4 gait training group. The duration of treatment will span across their inpatient rehabilitation length of stay after providing informed consent to their 9 months post-SCI visit in the outpatient rehabilitation setting. Subjects will wear an exoskeleton device and receive robotic gait training (RGT) with a physical therapist during a 45-minutes inpatient rehabilitation session. Subjects will complete 24 robotic gait training sessions over different durations during outpatient rehabilitation. Subjects will also complete a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment and questionnaires about walking and function. Subjects will be asked to wear an activity monitor to measure their activity.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Control Group
Subjects will receive usual care gait training without robotic gait training
|
Subjects will be randomized to one of 4 gait training group. The duration of treatment will span across their inpatient rehabilitation length of stay after providing informed consent to their 9 months post-SCI visit in the outpatient rehabilitation setting. Subjects will complete gait training with a physical therapist during a 45-minutes inpatient rehabilitation session. Subjects will also complete a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) assessment and questionnaires about walking and function. Subjects will be asked to wear an activity monitor to measure their activity. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury - II (WISCI-II) from baseline
Time Frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
The WISCI-II defines the physical limitation for gait secondary to impairment at the person level and indicates the ability of a person to walk after SCI.
The WISC-II rank orders the ability a person to walk on a scale of 0-20 with 0 representing no ability to stand or participate in assisted walking and 20 representing an ability to walk 10 meters with no devices, no braces, and no physical assistance.
|
Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Time Frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
The 10MWT assesses gait speed (m/s) over a short duration.
|
Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
|
Change in Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)
Time Frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
The SCIM assesses the ability of a person with spinal cord injury (SCI) to preform specified tasks independently, with assistance, or with assistive devices. SCIM is composed of 19 items with total SCIM scores ranging from 0 (required assistance) to 100 (independence). A higher score means greater independence. |
Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
|
Change in Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
Pain is a significant problem in many individuals with SCI.
A 0-10 Point Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS) is recommended as the outcome measure for pain intensity after SCI during acute and subacute phases.
Pain severity can be categorized into 3 distinct groups as relates to pain interference: 1-3 (mild), 4-7 (moderate), 8-10 (severe).
A higher score means greater pain severity.
|
Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
|
Change in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Time Frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is used to measure fatigue in neurologic disorders and measures the effects of fatigue on function. It is measure on the following scale:
|
Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
|
Change in Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS)
Time Frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
The PSFS is a self-report measure to assess a patient's perception of spasticity frequency and severity following a SCI.
With excellent internal consistency (ICC = 0.90), the current version was modified from the original to include both frequency and severity.
A higher score means greater magnitude in spasms.
|
Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
|
Change in Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
The PHQ-9 is a self-report measure to assess the presence of depressive symptoms. Each items is scored on the following scale: 0 - not at all
Total scores are calculated by adding all the score and provides a possible depression severity score: none (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderately severe (15-19), and severe (20-27). A higher score means greater severity in depressive symptoms. |
Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
|
Change in Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LISAT)
Time Frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
The LISAT is a nine-item quality of life questionnaire suitable for SCI populations containing a single item assessing overall life satisfaction, along with eight additional domain-specific items.
Items are answered on a 6-point likert scale that ranges from 1 (very dissatisfied), to 6 (very satisfied).
The total Life Satisfaction score is computed as the mean of the item scores and the results are divided into dissatisfied (1-4) and satisfied (5-6).
A higher score score means greater life satisfaction.
|
Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
|
Change in Physical Activity by GT9x Actigraph accelerometer
Time Frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
Active energy expenditure will be measured in counts per day using a GT9x Actigraph accelerometer.
Patient will be instructed to wear the watch on an unaffected wrist for one week.
Higher counts represent greater physical activity.
|
Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
|
Change in Neurophysiologic biomarkers by single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Time Frame: Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
Motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes will be measured and indexed from lower extremity muscle by single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
|
Change in baseline, within 5 days of discharge, within 5 days post-intervention (RGT Groups) or 1-month post-discharge (UC group), 1-month post-intervention or 2-months post-discharge (UC group) (5) 9-months post-SCI onset
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of adverse events
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 9 months
|
Number of adverse events occurring at baseline through study completion.
|
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Self-reported tolerance of treatment
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 9 months
|
Subjects provide feedback on their tolerance of treatment sessions via an 18-item questionnaire.
The questionnaire measures tolerability on a scale 0 (Not tolerable at all to 10 (Maximally tolerable).
A higher score means greater tolerability in robotic gait training.
|
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Rate of treatment completion
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 9 months
|
The average number of session attended divided by the number of scheduled sessions.
|
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Chad Swank, PhD, PT, NCS, Baylor Research Institute
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Swank C, Sikka S, Driver S, Bennett M, Callender L. Feasibility of integrating robotic exoskeleton gait training in inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 May;15(4):409-417. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1587014. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
- Swank C, Trammell M, Bennett M, Ochoa C, Callender L, Sikka S, Driver S. The utilization of an overground robotic exoskeleton for gait training during inpatient rehabilitation-single-center retrospective findings. Int J Rehabil Res. 2020 Sep;43(3):206-213. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000409.
- DiPasquale J, Trammell M, Clark K, Fowler H, Callender L, Bennett M, Swank C. Intensity of usual care physical therapy during inpatient rehabilitation for people with neurologic diagnoses. PM R. 2022 Jan;14(1):46-57. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12577. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
- Swank C, Galvan C, DiPasquale J, Callender L, Sikka S, & Driver D. Lessons Learned with Robotic Exoskeleton Use During Rehabilitation - therapeutic and medical severity considerations. Technology & Disability. 2020; 32(2): 103-110.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BSWRI IRB 021-205
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries
-
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli...Not yet recruitingInjury, Spinal Cord
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCompletedInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
Khon Kaen UniversityUnknownInjuries, Spinal Cord
-
Institut GuttmannNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Disease | Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) | Traumatic Spinal Cord InjuriesSpain
-
InVivo TherapeuticsTerminated
-
Ekso BionicsBurke Medical Research InstituteCompletedInjuries, Spinal CordUnited States
-
ReWalk Robotics, Inc.Unknown
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNot yet recruitingSpine Injury | Complete Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury | Cord Injury, Spinal | Cord Infarction Spinal
-
Shepherd Center, Atlanta GACompletedInjuries, Spinal Cord
Clinical Trials on Robotic Gait Training
-
City University of New YorkBronx Veterans Medical Research Foundation, IncTerminatedSpinal Cord Injuries | Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis | Paraplegia, Spinal | Paraplegia, SpasticUnited States
-
Baylor Research InstituteNational Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation...Recruiting
-
Biruni UniversityRecruitingChronic StrokeTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Multiple Sclerosis Center of CataloniaCompletedMultiple Sclerosis | Gait Disorders, NeurologicSpain
-
Indiana UniversityTerminatedTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)United States
-
Meltem Gunes AkinciNot yet recruitingStroke | Quality of Life | Post-stroke Depression | Post-stroke Fatigue | Post-stroke Anxiety
-
City University of New YorkIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; Bronx Veterans Medical Research Foundation...CompletedSpinal Cord Injuries | Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis | Paraplegia, Spinal | Paraplegia, SpasticUnited States
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedCerebrovascular Accident | Cerebral Stroke | Cerebrovascular Stroke
-
University of SharjahNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy Spastic DiplegiaUnited Arab Emirates
-
IRCCS San Raffaele RomaAzienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana; I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia; Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus and other collaboratorsCompletedStroke | Acute Stroke | Chronic StrokeItaly