- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05225987
Effects of Postpartum Nurse Navigation Program
The Effect of Nurse Navigation Program Developed for Postpartum Mothers on Mothers' Self-Care Power, Quality of Life, Anxiety and Depression Risks, and Physical Symptom Severity
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ankara, Turkey, 06010
- University of Health Sciences Etlik Zübeyde Hanim Gyn Diseases Education and Research Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- between the ages of 18-45
- gestational week ≥36,
- primiparous and singleton pregnancy,
- no vision and hearing problems,
- able to communicate via telephone,
- no complications during pregnancy and delivery (preeclampsia; eclapsia; diabetes; 7. hypertension; heart disease; kidney failure; HIV /AIDS)
8. pregnant women will be included.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Mothers who were illiterate,
- had problems in communicating,
- did not have a mobile phone of their own,
- residing outside the province of Ankara,
- had mental disability and severe mental illness and
- had preterm or postterm birth will exclude from the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Experimantal Group
Postpartum Nurse Navigation Program based care
|
In addition to routine hospital care, the intervention group will receive navigation program-based nursing care that includes three home visits, three phone calls, and sending text messages at five different times.
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
This group will take routin care
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-Care Power Scale Score
Time Frame: 5 months
|
The Self-Care Power Scale was developed by Kearney and Fleischer (1979) to determine individuals' ability to take care of themselves. Its Turkish validity and reliability was determined by Nahçıvan (1993), and the Cronbach α coefficient of the scale was stated as 0.89 (Nahcivan, 2004). The Scale consists of 35 items. Each item of this 5-point Likert-type scale, according to the answer given; It is evaluated by giving 0 points for the answer "Doesn't describe me at all", and 4 points for the answer "It describes me a lot". Evaluation is made out of a total of 140 points. Below 82 points is considered as low, 82-120 points as medium, above 120 points as high (Nahcivan, 2004). |
5 months
|
|
Postpartum Quality of Life Scale Score
Time Frame: 5 months
|
It was developed by Hill et al (2006) to evaluate the postpartum quality of life of mothers. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was carried out by Altuntuğ and Ege (2012), and the internal consistency coefficient of the scale was determined as 0.95 in the study (Altuntuğ & Ege, 2012). In the first part of the scale, satisfaction with each item is questioned, and in the second part, the importance is questioned. All items are evaluated on a 6-point Likert scale. Satisfaction and Significance sections of the scale are numbered from 1 to 6. 1=Not at all Satisfied, 2=Moderately Dissatisfied, 3=Slightly Dissatisfied, 4=Slightly Satisfied, 5=Moderately Satisfied, 6=Very Satisfied. The Quality of Life Score is in the range of 0-30. The higher the score obtained from the scale, the higher the person's postpartum quality of life, and lower scores the lower the postpartum quality of life (Hill et al. 2006, Altuntuğ & Ege, 2012). |
5 months
|
|
Postpartum Specific Anxiety Scale Score
Time Frame: 5 months
|
Fallon et al. (2016) to evaluate postpartum anxiety symptoms (Fallon et al, 2016). The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Duran (2019), and the internal consistency coefficient of the scale was determined as 0.91 in the study (Duran, 2019). The scale consists of 51 items. It has been stated that those who score 73 and below on the scale have low postpartum anxiety levels, those who score between 74 and 100 have a medium level, and those who score 101 and above have a high level (Duran, 2019). The scale was administered within 6 months of postpartum and it was recommended to be used during this period. In the development of the scale, retests were performed 2 weeks after the scale was applied (Fallon et al, 2016). |
5 months
|
|
Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale Score
Time Frame: 5 months
|
It was developed by Cox (1987). The scale is a self-report scale aimed at screening postpartum depression in women (Cox et al, 1987). The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was carried out by Engindeniz et al. (1996), and they found the internal consistency coefficient of the scale as 0.79 (Engindeniz et al., 1996). In this study, the Cronbach α value of the scale will be calculated. EPDS consists of 10 items. Each item of the scale is evaluated in a 4-point Likert format and the answer given to each item is scored between 0 and 3 (0, 1, 2, 3). The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 0, and the highest score is 30. In the evaluation of the scale, the 1st, 2nd and 4th items are scored as 0-1-2-3, while the 3rd, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th items are scored as 3-2-1-0. are scored inversely. The cut-off point of the scale is 12. Women with a score of 12 and above are considered to be at risk for depression (Engindeniz, 1996). |
5 months
|
|
Physical Symptom Severity Scale Score
Time Frame: 5 months
|
The scale was developed by Cine et al (2009) and aims to determine the prevalence and persistence of postpartum physical symptoms (Chien et al, 2009). The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was carried out by Arkan (2016). In the study of Arkan (2016), the internal consistency of the scale was determined to be at a very reliable level (Cronbach α=0.79). In this study, the cronbach α value of the scale will be calculated. The scale consists of 18 items. Each item of the scale is in a 4-point Likert format and these items are evaluated as 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), and 3 (high). Scale total score ranges from 0 to 54. High scores obtained from the scale indicate that the severity of postpartum physical symptoms is high (Arkan, 2016). |
5 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Gülten Koç, Hacettepe University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020/12
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgRecruitingQuality of Life | Postoperative Quality of Recovery | Health-Related Quality-of-LifeBelgium
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaCompletedImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
Children's National Research InstituteCompletedProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Linkoeping UniversityRecruiting
-
South Valley UniversityActive, not recruitingDeterminants of Health-related Quality of Life for Patients After Renal Lithotripsy: PNL Versus RIRSHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Institute of Oncology LjubljanaUnknownHealth-related Quality of LifeSlovenia
Clinical Trials on Postpartum Nurse Navigation Program based care
-
TURKAN OZDASEnrolling by invitation
-
Danish Cancer SocietyRigshospitalet, Denmark; TRYG Foundation; Center for Kræft og SundhedCompletedDepression | Anxiety | Health Behavior | Adverse EffectsDenmark
-
University Hospital, ToulouseUnknownHematologic NeoplasmsFrance
-
Vanderbilt UniversityBlue Cross Blue Shield; Nurses for Newborns FoundationCompleted
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityCompleted
-
Odense University HospitalDanish Cancer Society; University of Southern Denmark; Laval University; Region... and other collaboratorsCompletedQuality of Life | Colorectal Neoplasms | Self Efficacy | Case Management | Continuity of Care
-
Kilis 7 Aralik UniversityCompleted
-
NYU Langone HealthNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)Recruiting
-
Ataturk UniversityNot yet recruitingBreastfeeding | Breastfeeding EducationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
National Cancer Center, KoreaSamsung Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Korea University...UnknownCancer-related FatigueKorea, Republic of