Non-invasive Vagal Nerve Stimulation in Alcohol Use Disorder

June 16, 2025 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Non-invasive Vagal Nerve Stimulation to Improve Functional Outcomes in Veterans With Alcohol Use Disorder

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a major health concern amongst Veterans as it causes poor health, lost days at work, impaired psychosocial functioning, and decreased quality of life. Current treatment options for AUD show limited effectiveness, which is exemplified by high relapse rates. Chronic heavy drinking results in psychological and physical distress during abstinence, including anxiety, irritability, and general discomfort, which increases the urge to drink to relieve these symptoms. The hypothesis of this study is that noninvasive vagal nerve stimulation (nVNS) can modify the perception of such inner bodily sensations of distress, and consequently reduces the drive to drink for relief. The aim of this study is to establish feasibility and acceptability of applying nVNS as a rehabilitative treatment for AUD in Veterans. The study will also evaluate the effect of nVNS on functional outcomes, quality of life, distress, and craving, and if nVNS alters neural activation patterns in brain regions involved in the perception and awareness of distress and pain.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

AUD is a serious mental health disorder that affects more than 40% of US military Veterans, presenting a major burden to this population. Relapse rates of AUD are extremely high; over half of Veterans who complete treatment, relapse within 6 months, highlighting the need for improved treatments or differing treatment targets. Chronic, heavy drinking leads to an imbalance in homeostasis resulting in psychological and physical distress during periods of abstinence, and the urge to drink to relieve these symptoms to restore homeostasis.

nVNS is a low-risk form of neuromodulation that has been shown to alleviate anxiety and chronic pain, and to reduce drug and alcohol relapse in animal models. The investigators hypothesize that nVNS attenuates distress-related craving in AUD in humans by modifying the autonomic nervous system and changing the perception of inner bodily sensations of physiological and affective distress. The investigators also hypothesize that nVNS improves functional outcomes and quality of life in Veterans with AUD.

The proposed research will include 16 Veterans who meet for a diagnosis of AUD. Subjects will be randomly assigned to receive nVNS or sham stimulation prior to performing a well-validated functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging task designed to assess neural correlates of physical distress (via a heat stimulus). Subjects will then self-administer nVNS/sham at home twice a day for 7 days and return for a follow-up visit, during which all study components will be repeated. Behavioral assessments of functional disability, quality of life, psychological and physiological distress, and craving will be administered at baseline, after stimulation, and at follow-up.

The aim of the proposed study is to establish feasibility and acceptability of applying nVNS as a rehabilitative treatment for AUD. In addition, the study will evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of nVNS in improving functional outcomes and quality of life, in reducing distress and craving, and in altering neural activation patterns in brain regions involved in the perception and awareness of distress and pain. The proposed work has the potential to lead to innovative, low-risk treatment options with high promise to significantly improve the care and lives of Veterans as there is a need for alternative treatments for AUD. As such, this novel AUD treatment could be particularly beneficial for Veterans who do not tolerate pharmacotherapy, and who have access or cognitive limitations or stigma concerns that act as barriers to psychotherapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92161-0002
        • VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veteran
  • Male subjects between 21 and 65 years of age
  • Current DSM-5 diagnosis of AUD with at least one functional disability due to alcohol use, current alcohol craving, and current heavy drinking (>4 drinks on any day or >14 drinks per week)
  • Able to forgo consumption of alcohol for 24 hours without any serious discomfort including nausea/vomiting, visual/auditory/tactile hallucinations, or non-essential tremor

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment of Alcohol Scale (CiWA) score >=9 on the day of the scan (symptoms judged to be due to co-existing anxiety or headache disorders will not be counted toward the total).
  • Currently or recently (within last 90 days) enrolled in abstinence-based treatment program.
  • Evidence of a maladaptive pattern of substance use or abuse other than alcohol one month prior to screening visit.
  • Severe mental illness, e.g., psychosis or bipolar disorder
  • At risk for suicide or homicide
  • History of neurological disorder that might be associated with cognitive dysfunction.
  • History of head trauma involving loss of consciousness >24 hours
  • Clinically significant uncontrolled/unstable medical illness or clinically significant surgery within 1 month of the screening visit.
  • MRI-related exclusion criteria: cardiac pacemaker, metal fragments in eyes/skin/body, aortic/aneurysm clips, heart-valve replacement, copper intrauterine device, shunt (ventricular or spinal), neuro/bio-stimulators
  • Vagus nerve stimulation related criteria: history of carotid endarterectomy, severe carotid artery disease (e.g., history of transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke], congestive heart failure, cardiac arrhythmia, known severe coronary artery disease or recent myocardial infarction (within 5 years), history of seizure or syncope (within past year), prior neck surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active cervical transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation
Participants will be assigned to active transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation, received once during each of the study visits and self-administered twice a day for a week.
Active nVNS produces low-voltage electrical signal that generates sensations on the skin on upper anterior cervical area (overlying carotid artery) and that stimulates the vagus nerve.
Placebo Comparator: Sham cervical transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation
Participants will be assigned to sham transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation, received once during each of the study visits and self-administered twice a day for a week.
Sham nVNS produces low-voltage electrical signal that generates sensations on the skin on upper anterior cervical area (overlying carotid artery) and that does not stimulate the vagus nerve.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire (TAQ)
Time Frame: Measure administered at study completion (i.e., 1 week after baseline)
The Treatment Acceptability Questionnaire (TAQ) is a self-rating questionnaire used to assess acceptability of a treatment. The TAQ uses a 7-point rating scale ranging from 1 to 7, with lower scores reflecting lower acceptability and a midpoint of 4 indicating neutral acceptability. A rating above the midpoint of the TAQ (i.e., score between 5 and 7) is the established criterion for "acceptable to highly acceptable".
Measure administered at study completion (i.e., 1 week after baseline)
Measurement of Feasibility - Recruitment Goal (Data Reflects the Number of Participants Who Were Successfully Enrolled in the Study)
Time Frame: Baseline
Treatment feasibility will be evaluated by meeting the proposed recruitment goal of 16 Veterans within 12 months. This aim was measured as the number of study participants who signed the study consent form, completed at least the baseline study visit, and were included in the study analyses.
Baseline
Measurement of Feasibility - Treatment Adherence (Number of Times Subjects Self-administered nVNS/Sham Stimulation for 7 Days as Instructed)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention
Treatment adherence will be assessed via a daily treatment completion log, and calculated by dividing the total number of times subjects were instructed to self-administer the nVNS/sham stimulation (2x/day for 7 days = 14 times) by the number of times the subjects actually self-administered the stimulation. Treatment feasibility will be evaluated by meeting >75% treatment adherence during the 1-week interval.
Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention
Measurement of Feasibility - Subject Retention (Number/Percentage of Subjects Who Return for a Follow-up Visit)
Time Frame: Baseline to post treatment, up to 21 days post baseline
Treatment feasibility will be evaluated by meeting >75% subject retention at follow-up as measured by the number/percentage of subjects who return for a follow-up visit and complete primary outcome measures and return the device to the study team.
Baseline to post treatment, up to 21 days post baseline
Measurement of Feasibility - Serious Adverse Side Effects
Time Frame: Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention
Treatment feasibility will be evaluated by no occurrence of serious adverse side effects (as documented in checklist/daily log, interview at study completion, or otherwise reported by the participant).
Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Substance Use Recovery Evaluator (SURE)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention
The Substance Use Recovery Evaluator (SURE) assesses the following domains of AUD-related functional outcomes: self-care (mental and physical health), relationships, material resources (stability of housing and occupational resources), and outlook of life. The SURE has been developed for use in substance use disorder populations. The SURE is comprised of 21 items, rated on a 3-point scale, but scored using a 3-point scale. Scores range from 21-63. A higher score indicates better functional outcomes.
Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention
WHO Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL-BREF) - Psychological Domain
Time Frame: Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention
The WHO Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL-BREF) assesses quality of life across four domains (physical health, psychological, social relationships, and environment) with a total of 26 questions. The rating scale ranges from 1 to 5 and minimum and maximum values varies between domains (physical health: 7-35, psychological: 6-30, social relationships: 3-15, environment: 8-40). Higher scores denote higher quality of life. Reported here are results from the psychological domain.
Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) is a self-report instrument to measure the severity of anxiety and emotional distress. The BAI is a 21-item questionnaire with a 4-point rating scale (0-3), with a higher score reflecting greater anxiety. Total scores range from 0 to 63 with higher scores indicating higher anxiety.
Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention
PROMIS Pain Interference
Time Frame: Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention
The PROMIS Pain Interference measures self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life, i.e., the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. This questionnaire has 8 items with ratings ranging from "not at all" to "very much". Total score minimum is 8 and the maximum is 40. Higher scores reflect higher interference of pain with level of functioning.
Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention
Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention
The Alcohol Urge Questionnaire (AUQ) is 8-item scale that measures cognitive preoccupation with alcohol on a 7-point rating scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". Two items are reverse scored. Minimum score is 8 and maximum is 56. Higher scores reflect greater craving.
Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neural Response to Heat Pain Stimuli (Measured as Sum of BOLD Beta Coefficients Over Time in Arbitrary Units)
Time Frame: Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention
Participants receive brief thermal stimuli (experienced temperature ranging from warm to hot) applied to the leg via a contact thermode during a functional magnetic resonance imaging scan. Neural activation will be measured using the general linear model (GLM) to estimate beta coefficients for the BOLD (blood-oxygen-level-dependent) signal in response to thermal stimulation. Activation in the brain region insula will be summarized by calculating the area under the beta response curve (arbitrary units) over the stimulus duration (i.e., time), reflecting the total magnitude of neural activation. BOLD signal and beta coefficients used to model neural response are in arbitrary units. The area under the curve is the cumulative scaled beta (i.e., cumulative percent signal change) that is most reflective of the activation attributable to the stimulus. Higher numbers indicate more neural activation in the insula in response to painful heat stimuli.
Baseline to week 1 of 2x daily intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ruth Klaming, PhD, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Use Disorder

Clinical Trials on Cervical transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (active comparator)

Subscribe